Nudity


I knows this has t&a but someone mentioned this has male nudity too! Is that true? It doesn't bother me (guys can be hot too) but it's so rare to see ANY male nudity in these movies.

reply

What are you talking about preppy-3? There's been TOO MUCH male nudity in movies recently and not enough female nudity! When the girls are "naked" its usually just a topless scene (which is NON-GENITAL NUDITY), but when the males are naked its usually bottomless (showing FULL GENITAL NUDITY), so its completely unfair. Females are almost never bottomless and even when they are you only see bush, they are never in a position where you can see between their legs and see any actual female genitalia. Why should male genitalia be in several movies but never female genitalia? How can morons like you claim "its so rare to see ANY male nudity"??? What about Bruno? That showed a semi-erect penis in close-up detail swing around for almost 10 seconds! I've never seen a close-up shot of a vagina for 10 seconds in ANY mainstream, R-rated film, have you? Or how about Walk Hard showing a penis close-up? Or what about all the other films that showed dick in the last few years such as Jackass 3D, I'm Still Here, Zack & Miri Make A Porno, Sex & The City, Bliss, Observe and Report, Eastern Promises, Antarctica, Sex Drive:Unrated, and Forgetting Sarah Marshall. I can name over 25 films in the last 3 years that clearly showed full male genital nudity,yet there are virtually ZERO films that have shown female full genital nudity (the labia and clitoris). Even seeing just bush of the women (which is only body hair NOT actual genitalia) is far more rare than male genital nudity. We only see female bush maybe one time for every 5 times a penis is shown. That is completely unfair! And as for non-genital nudity (breasts or buttocks) its about equal; for every breast shot that you can name in cinema, I can provide an example of a man having to show his ass. (Even this is unfair because the MPAA usually gives the man's bare ass a PG-13 rating but the woman's breasts an R-rating!)

So stop complaining about the "lack of male nudity"; you only prove yourself to be a complete buffoon. What we need in cinema is a lot more female nudity, particularly more bottomless female nudity, and we need to see some full female genitalia for a change(clitoris and labia).

reply

My my. Such an angry post. First off they HAVE shown topless females in PG films. I'm thinking "Hair" and "Just One of the Guys". Also one of those films you mentioned that supposedly show male nudity--"Sex & the City". Oh really? When? I don't remember ANY male nudity in that. Oh wait! Maybe it was for 2 SECONDS in one part! Showing a dick for a few seconds automatically makes it too much for a idiot like you. Female topless scenes last longer and there are a LOT more of those. And this crap about bush NOT being nudity. Why the hell would you WANT to see the labia and clitoris? And for your information they HAVE shown it in "My Bloody Valentine 3-D". Only real perverts would want to see closeups of that. You want to see that go watch a porno. Also you come across as a misogynistic jerk by screeching that a few seconds of male frontal nudity is too much BUT we should see more pussy. I'm not the idiot here.

reply

Why the hell would you WANT to see the labia and clitoris?


What? And in your first post you say men can be hot too? Think it's about time someone comes out of the closet.


--------------------------------
dies ist meine unterschrift

reply

Well I've been openly gay for many years now so it's safe to say I AM out of the closet!

reply