Pathetic
As of now, there are 2 pages of reviews, and EVERY single one is a 10-star review written by a user with 1 review in their history. I will not give this film a chance because of this obvious planting.
share[deleted]
How can you see no problem with it, unless you wrote them yourself? There's no integrity in it, it's sketchy, and it's dishonest. They don't mean what they're writing, they're only doing it to get paid or because they're friends with the filmmakers.
share[deleted]
your right, its not dishonest, its misleading. i had my good friend look over these reviews, he is a University lecture, and holds a PHD.
he sees hundreds of papers every year. its his job to analyse the papers and pick up on plagiarising. it is his opinion that there are perhaps 4, but probably 2 or 3 authors to all of these reviews.
Some of the evidence:
The star ratings- all identical,
The accounts- none have a pervious review record. Nearly all are from the states. ALL are from Major cities, witch is statistically unlikely.
The writing style: to similar to be coincidence; many are opened with “I know I’m an expert” lines such as:
“As a criminal investigator with thirty years of experience” or “As a person diagnosed with HIV for over 16 years, and never once taking the drugs” or “As someone who has followed the scientific debates regarding the cause of AIDS since the early 1990's”.
[deleted]