MovieChat Forums > House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic (2009) Discussion > Suspicious...

Suspicious...

posted 14 years ago by MeanerWithTheScenery
7 replies | jump to latest

18 reviews, 18 ten star ratings, and 18 reviewers who have NO further posting history at all. No other reviews, no comments, no forum posts, no profile info, just a ten star review for House of Numbers by each of their names.

.

[–] lemniscape 14 years ago

You mean ten star ratings. But I agree with you: it is very suspicious.

[–] MeanerWithTheScenery 14 years ago

Oops. Edit pending. Thanks.

.

[–] lazysunday08 14 years ago

I haven't seen this film, but I'm curious too.

Right now (1/26/10), it has:

83 x 10 star votes

42 x 1 star votes

Amazing job with the reviews though, really could fool anyone. My question now is, why aren't the people who hated the film writing reviews?

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]

[–] yfguitarist 14 years ago

You're still trying to get people to see the film though. And the problem is, we won't because of the shady marketing tactics.

[–] 14 years ago

[deleted]

[–] riahsha 13 years ago

You spend quite a bit of time, tyrexden, on forum boards defending a movie you haven't seen.