NEVER point to specific things that was wrong. It is always some emotional based statement that it is garbage or wrong, but nothing further.
I read through a lot of these people that think the movie is "garbage" and not one brought anything of value that actually disproved what was said. Probably because they can't, but instead just got emotionally that they may have been lied to.
*They intentionally showed Christine Maggiore's tests out of order to serve their own agenda, figuring no one would notice they're out of order. Whoops, we did notice, and it shows, she lied.
Her "incriminating tests" are also intentionally cropped. Why??
*They lied and said Tommy Morrison tested negative in subsequent tests, when Morrison never provided any negative tests after 1996. (Just cropped tests.) They also lied and said he was accepted back into boxing because of it, when Morrison actually only competed in farcical matches in obscure states that require no HIV test. Hmmmm...
*They completely fouled up the Padian study. I don't even have enough energy to go into detail with how badly they lied, but they lied.
*They intentionally cropped Gelderblom's interview to make it look like he was saying the electron microscope pictures weren't good, as if that is proof there really are no photos. Him calling it "a nuisance" was intended to make the viewer think, "gee, there are no photos? It never has been purified?" In actuality, it is only a nuisance to those who don't understand science. The full interview tries to show him explaining it all to Leung, holding his hand the whole way.
A perfectly detailed picture doesn't need to be taken to prove the existence of something. Atoms, anyone? Gravity? But no, HIV deniers harp on the obscurity of photos as if that shows HIV has never been found. Spoiler alert: it has.
*The film holds Papadopulos in some high regard, but she has only a Masters degree and no actual background in HIV research, and she is forbidden to keep her employment if she dares to do her stupid Perth Group research on the premises. (However, beside Peter "Dussel" Duesberg and Kary "I've been-abducted-by-aliens Mulis, who else was HoN really going to get with a scientific background to pedal their garbage?)
Hmm, there is just five huge blunders off the top of my head, and yes, Maggiore died of AIDS. Her camp got the veterinarian, Al-Bayati to simply "interpret" her second autopsy. Why? What is there to hide? Probably her disseminated herpes, candidiasis, and pneumonia shown in her first autopsy that is all classic AIDS.
So there are six examples and not one bit of emotion; just facts. I suggest watching Myles Powers' Youtube miniseries on debunking HoN. It's in eight or nine parts and dispels all the garbage this fauxumentary tries to pedal.
Here's his written synopsis: http://mylespower.co.uk/2013/05/24/infantile-views-on-evidence-and-more-shady-editing-in-the-documentary-house-of-numbers/