will they be pigs again? - 17 Kids and Counting (2008) Discussion

[–] ChocolateBootyZombie 8 years ago

There are so many issues in the world today and you harp on a frugal family taking advantage of a promotion. Sad really.

Soon to be featured in a movie

reply

[–] maya-912-366050 8 years ago

Laughing so hard. Taking advantage is right. No family, not even 1 with 25 members, needs 25 dozen donuts. Sorry 24 as they gave one away. If they wanted to save a buck and take advantage, 3 boxes would have been plenty considering how many of the members are toddlers who may eat 1.

reply

[–] valro 8 years ago

I understand they own a donut shop and I wouldn't put it past them to repackage those free donuts they get and then sell them there.

reply

[–] nonami18 8 years ago

No Hun they don't.

reply

[–] SarahCynical 8 years ago

Just an FYI, zombie is Boland using one of his fake black IDs.

It's really pretty much stealing from a small business owner when they have millions.

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Stop making up ridiculous things, Sarah/Questionality.

Get help, or BUZZ OFF!!

Great to see CBZ is back.Queer engineer tries beer?!Her being in the loop was the best thing all around.

reply

[–] Taco_Lips 8 years ago

They probably know enough not to advertise it, if they did take advantage, after the last few years backlash.

It got me thinking though... I wonder if they are the type of people who deliberately complain at restaurants for no reason just to get free/discounted meals.

Riddle wrapped inside an enigma, wrapped inside a taco.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Folks who look for things to complain about and bully people with legal nonsense are, actually, spreading bad karma if you aks me.The engineer's aunt haunted him.She was in the loop alright.

reply

[–] maya-912-366050 8 years ago

Nobody asked you.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Lose the 'tude, Maya.Crappy engineer =(Thanks to the Tarot Wiccan, she was in the loop in no time flat.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

Lose the 'tude, Maya

Ha ha ha. Excellent

reply

[–] SarahCynical 8 years ago

Agreeing with yourself again Boland? Isnt' it just a little sad that the only people who like or agree with you are your fake IDs?

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

Are you referring to me? I don't know "Boland" at all. I have been on IMDB a long time and have not met that person, or you. If you are calling me fake you need to back it up. That's a childish presumption on your part

reply

[–] SarahCynical 8 years ago

Not childish at all. First, you suddenly show up on this board. Second you laugh at Boland's moronic oft repeated retort. Third Boland has about a hundred fake IDs. Fourth most of his fake IDs are created in 2005.

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Fifth, you are completely wrong, poster.

Find something else to do, why don't you, Sarah/Questionality?Crapass Engineer SwallowsThe Muslim and the Jew found themselves in Diaper City on the West Coast. Poop.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

Not childish at all. First, you suddenly show up on this board. Second you laugh at Boland's moronic oft repeated retort. Third Boland has about a hundred fake IDs. Fourth most of his fake IDs are created in 2005.

So, by your reckoning:
1. Every person new to this board is Boland.
2. Everyone who finds Boland amusing is Boland.
3. Every third poster on this board is Boland.
4. Every person who started their membership on iMDB in 2005 is Boland.

It appears it's rather difficult to avoid being Boland, except for one teensie tiny little fact: I AM NOT BOLAND. You are such a moronic child you appear to believe that YOU accusing ME of being some person named Boland will make it so. I suggest you get a life and stop fantasizing/obsessing about Boland.
You are nuts.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Thanks for clearing that up.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

by jamesboland » 23 minutes ago (Sun Jun 12 2016 19:18:47)
IMDb member since July 2006
Thanks for clearing that up.

Not problem whatsoever. You are most welcome.

Signed,

I am not Boland, but I appreciate his humor.

reply

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

by SarahCynical » 3 hours ago (Sun Jun 12 2016 20:26:22) Flag ▼ | Reply |
IMDb member since June 2008
You've proved my point with your irrational straw man argument.

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Oh my God! You have serious mental issues! The only person who believes you is you! Boland knows he does not know me and he knows he is not me. I know I do not know Boland and I am not Boland. Any further argument from you to the contrary is further proof that you are stark raving mad.

There is no "straw man" argument. I deposed you, point by point. What are you, 12?

Boland, if you're out there, and you're reading this, I feel for you buddy. You have a real nut job on your back. My husband and I are having a laugh over this. If I were to try to spoof anyone on IMDB, which I wouldn't because it's just not that serious, I sure wouldn't use my REAL name. I have a history on IMDB, there are comments I have written since 2005, having no following and nothing to do with Boland. This Sarah is crazy and obsessed! She might think she is Perry freakin' Mason, but she's just stupid and I think, rather in love with Boland.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Thank you for your kind words, Darla.

While I admit that I myself can certainly find amusement in her folly, I must also accept reality and recognise that Sarah's rather bizarre rantings are quite possibly a thinly veiled cry for help.

The only other "straw man" argument I've seen her engage in was when she perpetuated the "prove to me that ghosts don't exist" fallacy. Ironic. Like ten thousand spoons ironic.

I do hope she gets help.TWiNSI reject her carbon dioxide and create my own.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

Thank you for your kind words, Darla.

While I admit that I myself can certainly find amusement in her folly, I must also accept reality and recognise that Sarah's rather bizarre rantings are quite possibly a thinly veiled cry for help.

The only other "straw man" argument I've seen her engage in was when she perpetuated the "prove to me that ghosts don't exist" fallacy. Ironic. Like ten thousand spoons ironic.

I do hope she gets help.

You are very welcome, James. As I have only this one experience with Sarah, it's still lightly amusing to me. As she appears to be severely stuck on discrediting you and anyone who agrees with you, and it seems to go back quite a way, I can only express my condolences to you. She does indeed need some help. I know this for certain, as evidenced by the fact I am certain I am NOT you, nor am I a made-up personality. Contrast that with the fact that a person who knows nothing of me, yet continues to posit that I am YOU. I know she has a serious problem with reality and accepting such. I don't understand how anyone can argue with a stranger that "they are not they". It's just crazy.

I can assure you that I am certain I am not you, nor am I a personality you have created. It boggles my mind that Sarah continues to insist I am not "real". It WAS amusing, but yes, this has reached a seriously creepy stage with her. I don't think she realizes that a real person will not accept the machinations of her odd mind and "admit" they are not "real".

I can assure all and sundry, I am real. Ask my mother. Or, oops, her ghost.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Yes, on a fundamental level, we know for certain that we are not the same person. As for Sarah/Questionality, either they're the same person or I've read the same life story in their posts. The genius "level" IQ, the doctorate "level" brain, etc. Sad really.

As far as her "user ID" ramblings in which my name gets mentioned, I have always had just this one IMDb account, and my username has always been the same. Sorry to go on about this, but she's gone to some length to discredit me and it's nice when someone doesn't accept her nonsense and points out the insanity of it as you have. Yo.

Why does she do it? I can't read the mind of a wackadoodledoo, but I have a pretty good idea, I think: she's never liked it when I've stuck up for other posters that she's bullied. When she abandons the argument to find a new poster to call "jamesboland," it just spirals from there.

Stubborn as anything, and still trying to be convincing, she's gone from claiming 50 to now over 100 usernames connected to the same person. (she's even posted lists). None except jamesboland have a thing to do with me. I wonder, does she have newspaper clippings of the letters b,o,l,a,n and d taped to her door/gate?

Bottom line: her stinky 'tude is unappreciated and I hope she gets help.

Thanks for reading. Kindness goes a long way, and I will do my best to post in tandem with you when waters get rough. Thank you, and please thank your husband for the positivity. Happy posting!Sister, SisterHaving her in the loop was the perfect thing.

reply

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Taco_Lips 8 years ago

Yeah I was going to comment on this, but figured I wouldn't stir the pot anymore, plus I had committed to blocking and ignoring her. But I saw these replies and thought, eh, screw it... might as well put my 2 cents worth in while we're having the discussion...

I honestly think SarahCynical is a troll. Doing this whole "You're Spartacus-I mean- Boland" thing for sh!ts and giggles, and to get responses from other posters (especially newer to the board ones) who are sure to respond to such bizarre behavior and accusations - which is why I try not to comment regarding it, or toward it anymore. I don't want to feed the troll, and that's pretty much my advise to you all - and has been my advise to Sarah in the past, too. For her to simply ignore this Boland dude, and any other poster that she *seriously* thinks are him...

But her only response was the same old "You're Boland!" back at me, when I was just trying to point out her own 'irrational straw man arguments' and how she is contributing - if not outright instigating in many cases I've witnessed - the very behaviors she claims to hate in other posters.

Just seems illogical to me to keep engaging with someone (or about someone) you have such issues with. But, what do I know. Apparently I'm Boland too because my name is a double entendre, or something, which surely proves it... couldn't possibly be from a parody song about it being the only thing that rhymes with "Apocalypse"... Link: https://youtu.be/Q9aM9Ch97U8?t=4m11s
(I used to be a big Walking Dead fan, not so much anymore - been meaning to change it but haven't found a name I like better yet...plus I do genuinely like tacos!)

Riddle wrapped inside an enigma, wrapped inside a taco.

reply

[–] SarahCynical 8 years ago

Of course you do.Boland posts a bunch of crap using his puppets to attack me and support himself. He is a well known troll and you support him. Res ipsa liquitor.

You can lie all you want. I am not a troll, Iam a troll hunter.

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Being that mean to people when they express a POV in contrast to your "reality" is indeed trolling, Sunshine.Engineer of ExcusesWhomever it is you can sue, or dream you can sue, do it with her sister's lawyer hat.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

Being that mean to people when they express a POV in contrast to your "reality" is indeed trolling, Sunshine.

While I am not you, nor any part of your id or ego, you just took the fun out of sunshine, for me.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

Oh goodness, didn't wish to ruin a good thing.

If this helps, I addressed her as such because she her username was SarahSunshine before she changed it to SarahCynical. So I used the word in an ironic sense. Didn't mean to seriously attribute that to her. Hopefully she'll buzz off and leave us alone.

Oh, and thank you for not being me. I already have enough me to deal with.Mommy's Crappy EngineerShe was in the loop and she wnt unnoticed.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

by SarahCynical » 9 hours ago (Tue Jun 14 2016 09:32:25)
IMDb member since June 2008
Of course you do.Boland posts a bunch of crap using his puppets to attack me and support himself. He is a well known troll and you support him. Res ipsa liquitor.

You can lie all you want. I am not a troll, Iam a troll hunter.

You, Madame, belong in a circus. Or under a bridge.

reply

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Taco_Lips 8 years ago

I certainly don't support him, at all. I disagree with most everything he posts, but I haven't seen him actively "troll" people the way you do, out of nowhere with these accusations and mentions in threads they weren't even present or participating in.

You can lie all you want. I am not a troll, Iam a troll hunter.

You can say that with a straight face? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUG-wzYxHVI lmfao... Vescere Bracis Meis

Confirmed... You love the attention this brings. Sorry I fed you. Back on my ignore list you go. That's my advise to everyone else, as well.

Riddle wrapped inside an enigma, wrapped inside a taco.

reply

[–] Questionality 8 years ago

I agree. THey are still greedy bastards, but they will be more quiet about it because they are desperately hoping to get the show renewed.

If they got the donuts and turned around and brought them to a food bank or a homeless encampment, it wouldn't be a problem. But they eat crap as it is and then add a dozen donuts each? I'd be surprised if they made it to retirement age. But since they don't believe in real jobs, they have nothing to retire from.

erutangis

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

FYI Sarah is a bully.

As you can see, Sarah/Questionalty.He cheated while she harped.Kept in the loop by apathetic family.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

by
jamesboland
» 4 days ago (Wed Jun 8 2016 20:15:43)
IMDb member since July 2006

FYI Sarah is a bully.

As you can see, Sarah/Questionalty.

Do you think she is intelligent enough to be a bully? I find her to be sophomoric, one dimensional and more than a little moronic.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

I think the basis of bullying is a combination of bluffing, immaturity and insecurity.

Bluffing about knowledge may be the basis of cyberbullying. And when it happens here, it seems to be targeted toward the "newbies" if you will.

A quick google search or an online thesaurus may help one appear intelligent initially, especially to a new user who hasn't already seen other messages from the same poster with gross misspellings and grammatical errors.

In the end, somone who engages in trolling/cyberbullying (aka vuppery) is left bitter, cynical and rude. There's no positive end to trolling as a means.

On a happier note, posts with good intent and a positive message tend to be the cream that rises to the top of the boards.The shrink couldn't take her anymore.The pepperoni aksed why the pool is closed.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

by
jamesboland
» 4 days ago (Wed Jun 8 2016 20:15:43)
IMDb member since July 2006

FYI Sarah is a bully.

As you can see, Sarah/Questionalty.

Do you think she is intelligent enough to be a bully? I find her to be sophomoric, one dimensional and more than a little moronic.

reply

[–] SarahCynical 8 years ago

Oh Jimmy, still the sad pathetic creature living under a bridge using sock puppets to agree with yourself. As if that's a sign of intelligence.

But I'm much better now.

reply

[–] DarlaKDavis 8 years ago

by SarahCynical » 4 hours ago (Mon Jun 27 2016 09:43:42)
IMDb member since June 2008
Post Edited: Mon Jun 27 2016 09:44:30
Oh Jimmy, still the sad pathetic creature living under a bridge using sock puppets to agree with yourself. As if that's a sign of intelligence.

Do you REALLY think Boland is the only other person on IMDB? I realize you are obsessed with Boland, but perhaps you should ask for his autographed photo and permission to start his first official fan club. This would free up the time you are currently using to deny other folks actually exist.

Your rock-solid denial that any poster might be someone other than Boland makes you really creepy and stupid.

Looks like it's time to block you. You refuse to look at a person's posting history, which SHOULD prove to you they are not Boland, but you are so freaking dumb, why would you bother? Do folks in your real life (If you have one) ever tell you that you are nuts?

reply

[–] Manna-Fest 8 years ago

Are you going to reply to me on that Bones thread I made or what bitch? You calling me a freaking bigot out of nowhere like really? You can't even face me again and you've been posting the last four days too Hurry up and answer me so I can see just what you have the guts you say to me! This isn't over trick!

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

I find whenever Sarah/Questionality is called out, she posts elsewhere.

And elsewhere is just another place where she tries harassing and bullying other posters. Sad really.The engineer's butt hurts.One more in the loop could have doubled the effectiveness.

reply

[–] Manna-Fest 8 years ago

Holy crap, I didn't even realize a string of this thread was focused on her. I figured the "Sarah/Questionality" had to do with some one on the show, but I see it's about this bitch. Skimming through some comments on this page, this trick seems to be a real menace.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

She's not spreading sunshine, that's for sure.Programmed to pukeIn the loop the (w)hole time.

reply

[–] Lawlosaurus 8 years ago

I see her more as a victim than a bully tbh. Her posts are merely a cry for help. The paranoia, the delusions of grandeur, the multiple personalities, etc. This is someone who is clearly in need of psychiatric care. I hope she gets the help she needs. I really do.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

She seems bewilderingly paranoid to me. Someone like that may need Intervention.Pumped full of SillyShe wasn't in the loop and she survived.

reply

[–] akrisluvskev 8 years ago

It's funny how to some of you getting free donuts is only a horrible when this family does it.

reply

[–] maya-912-366050 8 years ago

No. If any other family got 26 dozen donuts, a total waste and taking advantage of a local business, would say the same thing.

reply

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] LaraCroftLegacy 8 years ago

by cardinal42 » 4 hours ago (Wed Oct 12 2016 18:32:25)
IMDb member since July 2015
Get a life Sarah. You are pathetic!

Actually the only people pathetic is cardinal42 and anyone who defend a child molester named Josh Duggar

Lara Croft Himiko! The First Sun Queen! This is Yamatai.

reply

[–] Katiedidd 8 years ago

Get a life Sarah. You are pathetic!

You really bumped an old thread to say something so pointless? Just look in the mirror when saying "get a life."

I know some may think, "if they're a troll, just ignore them." But people like Nancy and Boland (and all of his sock puppets) don't go away no matter what. Such ignoramuses should not be allowed to run amok and not get called out when they behave so creepily.

There is my rant for Saturday, lol. Have a great night, everyone.

reply

[–] jamesboland 8 years ago

YOu need counseling, Sarah, IMHO. Love y'aall. =oIn the loop she remained.
While her heartless twin pondered tarot.

reply

[–] LaraCroftLegacy 8 years ago

No Sara doesn't need counseling that title belong to Duggar huggers who see no wrong into what Josh did to six underage girls and four of them being his own sisters

Lara Croft Himiko! The First Sun Queen! This is Yamatai.

reply