MovieChat Forums > The Age of Stupid (2009) Discussion > not another liberal movie hoax

not another liberal movie hoax


My GAWD, you tree huggers - Al Gore's numerous lies in 'Inconvenient Truth' have been documented all over the web....you think you can just repackage these lies in a new movie and they become true?

Wake up, people...the Global Warming hoax is nothing more than the latest gimmick socialists are trying to use to advance their political agenda.

reply

Look at the hypocritical charlatans who made this movie when they are asked the simple question, "How did you get here today?" The regal arrogance of Hollywood and its pet liberal institutions is enough to make me throw up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-cvK9vxA6M



You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.

reply

[deleted]

Whoawhoawhoa hold on- it's "climate change" now that global warming has been exposed as a fraudulent power play- you see, ANY change now is clearly caused by us evil people- err... I mean evil right wingers. WHY ARE YOU DESTROYING THE PLANET TOTALLY ON PURPOSE?!?!?! We have to take action now- if you support the prevention of climate change you MUST stop breathing, your Co2 is killing us! (It is still Co2 thats destroying the planet right? And for goodness sake please disregard the fact that changes in the temperature caused by the sun are what affect the Co2 levels!) Lets keep up the good work (and the pseudoscience and avoidance of any actual facts or honesty)!
lol

reply

So George Bush is a liberal or socialist? The global warming hoax is perpetuated by a lot more people than socialists and liberals.

reply

So George Bush is a liberal or socialist? The global warming hoax is perpetuated by a lot more people than socialists and liberals.

George W. Bush was a tax-and-spend liberal posing as a conservative.

Teresa
http://MermaidLady.com

reply

Wow, I can't believe there are people this ignorant still left in the world. Ummm global warming isn't a hoax. Dig that iceberg off the port bow of Australia.

Why can't the fanatics learn to write properly? Every post in this thread is just gibberish.

reply

while i might not completely agree with everything the OP said... i do believe in the basic sense that 'global warming' is pretty much BS as you hear story's etc online that say it's mostly not true as the earth naturally does this sorts of stuff in cycles over thousands/10's of thousands of years etc etc.

either way it seems there's 'so-called' experts on both sides saying it's real and some say it's not... which i figure when factoring that in, the long term damage of the so-called 'climate change' is probably largely exaggerated in terms of the negative effects of it.

so while i am not against cutting back on pollution etc, as it just seems like a good idea in general, i think as far as 'climate change' is concerned the effects on the earth are probably exaggerated as i was saying as the earth naturally does stuff like it's doing now in cycles over the 1000's and 10's of thousands of years etc.

p.s. i am not a expert on the matter by any means but it does make you wonder that there is financial gain for people to keep pushing it in mainstream media.

and as said above... they changed the saying from 'global warming' (since i don't think it's really warming up anymore and some say it might even be cooling now?) to 'climate change'... which does make you wonder if there's more to it than they tell us ;) (i.e. all BS just so some people can profit etc etc from it)

bottom line... 'climate change' is pretty much BS. for sure at least in the sense that WE (i.e. us humans) have any real effect on it in the long run.

also... no offense to anyone in here but this is my opinion.

EDIT: go watch Season 1 Episode 3 of a show called 'Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura' which talks about this 'global warming/climate change' stuff and you tell me what's going on ;) which basically sums it up in that 'the powers that be' are basically pushing this 'climate change' thing for power/financial gain etc.



---
My Vote History ... http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=11026826
---

reply

[deleted]

Yeah, all of you guys are right and the National Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society, top journals and climatologists are all mistaken. I'm going to definitely listen to what that ex-wrestler has to say.

reply

Yeah, who needs those socialist scientists anyway? I don't need modern medicines, homes and cars that science made possible. They are all a bunch of liars. I'll bet that gravity is a hoax too.

reply

Aside from the climate change debate, Doesn't anyone else find it bizarre that the word 'liberal' is a bad thing in America, or am I the only non-American who bothers with imdb?
Surely I would have thought that ideology, of being open to new ideas, progress etc. would be a good thing? Martin Luther was a liberal who kick-started Protestantism; Or for that matter Martin Luther King was a liberal who preached equality. Would they be painted as socialist lefties out to line their own pockets if they lived in America today?

But regarding climate change, even if the overwhelming majority of scientists, governments, and even now the oil companies are all wrong and that humanity isn't having an effect on the climate, we STILL only have enough oil left for about another 50 years at current consumption levels. NO-ONE with any sense disputes this.

So argue about the 'how' all you want, the fact remains that we HAVE to change our ways or else be stuck with relying on foreign countries for energy, and then just being straight-up screwed when that runs out. It is possible, and carbon tax is one possibility, but would you rather pay for research into cleaner tech, or be stuck with no energy to power the air-con when you're that little bit older and more frail?

reply