The reviewer on the title page claims, "Again playing opposite a man she could be the mother of, let alone a wife."
Luner: born May 1971
Lennarson: born October 1972
Obviously, math is not this person's strong suit. But, bitchiness sure is!
I totally agree with you that the reviewer is missing the mark. There's nothing wrong with Jamie's performance here. She's totally capable with her acting skills, and she's beautiful as ever. The husband's character is rather dull if anything, but Jamie complements everyone in this film. Too bad this reviewer has nothing else to focus on but her hair! Haha. :)
shareShe does look older for her age. But her acting is superb and the reviewer sounds like a haterade.
shareHow funny - I came on here to read some reviews and saw the one from someone who obviously has issues with beautiful women. It irritates me when reviews get into bashing women for aging naturally, then bashing them for doing things to slow it down. It's a lose lose situation.
I thought Jamie Luner was extremely beautiful when I first saw her on Profiler, and I think she still is. I would imagine the reviewer is going bald based on her obsession with Jamie's gorgeous hair. Mop? Seriously? Glad to know I'm not the only one who found that review ridiculous.