MovieChat Forums > 18-Year-Old Virgin (2009) Discussion > An unrealistic funny movie with a lot of...

An unrealistic funny movie with a lot of Nudity.,,,and SMALL PENISES!

posted 15 years ago by cubasterd
23 replies | jump to latest

Ok, so it wouldn't have been good without the loads of nudity and sexual content but it was funny and COMPLETELY unrealistic. Its a stupid movie but it does have its laughs. There is too much nudity so you might only want to watch this with someone you're *beep* very close friends, or alone -- not for family members.

The funniest ,most unintentional, part of the movie was all the guys having SMALL COCKS! LOL ALL of them!! That guy during the 4some cock was like 2-3 inches long and they had the nerve to have him doing a sex scene with him and the girl both standing..lol... THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE WITH HIS ITTY-BITTY PENIS!

Did they go out of their way to get guys with small cocks... that was hilarious

[–] zebrabungle 15 years ago

So speaks the voice of experience, I heard they wanted to get you but needed more then a inch and a quarter...so no, this time they did not go out of their way....but hey, better luck next time Wee "where is it?" Willy.

"Durka my Gherkin or I'll Jihad your Dad"

[–] cubasterd 15 years ago

were you one of the guys in the movie? lol

LOL..... come on, watch the movie!

[–] sdsungod 15 years ago

Haven't seen this, just saw the box and thought "that girl on the cover is totally sexy" and I happen to like funny stories with my boobie flicks. So I came here to see if the movie is both sexy and also funny. Then I found out there are penises in it? Why do they include penis in a movie that is obviously intended for straight guys who watch just to see a sexy pair of boobies?

"Enough of that technical talk, Foo!"

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] blackthirteen 14 years ago

were you one of the guys in the movie?

LoL, I thought the same thing! Even if he wasn't, he must have a small wang to have reacted like that.

------
We belong to each other now. For better...for worse...like love--only real.

[–] CaptainTiddlywinks 11 years ago

or maybe he was fairly poking fun at the OP for being a douchebag.

[–] rogelio1987 15 years ago

I only remember one penis in the entire movie.

[–] blue_spawn 15 years ago

fyi: the size of a penis has little to do with sexual pleasure. 90% of the vagina has no nerve endings.

As Yoda the Jedi Master once put it:

Size matters not, for my ally is the force and a powerful ally it is.

[–] whynot2 15 years ago

well, technically speaking, you are absolutely correct.

But, on the other hand, why do guys tend to like...firm, pert boobies, flat tummies, long legs, smallish bums, hourglass figures, etc...

to the extent that 'sexual pleasure' focuses on those nerve endings 'down there', none of those things should matter either.

'sexual pleasure' deals with a whole lot more than 'those' nerve endings; there's a lot of other nerve endings involved, and a whole lot of, shall we say, psychology involved, too.

[–] blue_spawn 15 years ago

Typically when you hear people refer to penis size it's a judgement on how good someone is in bed. My point being that it's a complete BS. You can have a smaller than average equipment and be a master in the sack.

That being said, I understand where you're coming from with sexual pleasure being psychological.

[–] somewhereovertheturnip 14 years ago

Na, I've slept with a fair few women over the years, and every single one of them without fail has said they enjoy a decent sized willy a lot more than a small one.

It's not about nerve endings alone, it's about much more than that. Masculinity vs femininity for one.

Sure, you can have a 10 incher and be a novice, and you can have a stump and be a god, but that's not to say you can't have the best of both! ;)

[–] xxCUTHBERT_ALLGOODxx 12 years ago

@whynot2

VERY well put.

"All right... we waste him. No offense."

- Hicks Lives.

[–] TheMonkofDestiny 15 years ago

Way to screw up that quote.

[–] blue_spawn 15 years ago

Ah yes. Fixed.

[–] sarcasm83 14 years ago

yeah, but it's just simple logic that a bigger tool massages a bigger part of that "10% you claim to have nerve endings"... AKA it stimulates the vagina more thurally. (Sorry for stating the obvious)

AND what you said is totally wrong. The outer parts of the vagina has 90% of all the vagina's nerve endings and only 10% are inside the actual vaginal "tunnel".

Therefore, whole 100% of a vagina has nerve endings. Just 90% of em are on the 1/3 portion of the vagina, around the "entrance"...

So in that sense; If you're too big to fit your tool fully inside a girl, your stomach and balls and whatever never touch her "outer vagina bits" and therefor it results to a lesser amount of pleasure for the girl. Too small and the 10% inside aren't fully massaged, again not resulting to much pleasure.

So I'd say the basic medium sized penis is the one to go with, eventually.

And even if you know how to touch a vagina from all the right places, you still have to figure out individually with every girl what the girl likes and get the whole mental side right, which is a HUGE portion of the whole thing.

Is "it" big enough for her liking visually..

Is it big enough to stimulate her down there...

do you know how to touch her with your hands...

are you fat or skinny or normal or muscular enough...

is your personal hygiene what she likes..
[honestly, one girl made me brush my teeth before sex, even though my teeth are fine and another actually prefered me to NOT have a shower when I had sweat up coz she had a thing for sweat.. wtf. :| I want a CASE SPECIFIC MANUAL FOR EVERY GIRL :|)

.. does she like talking dirty..
does she not like her legs to be spread too much open coz she's embarrassed for some reason... EVERYTHING CAN BE A FACTOR... _EVERYTHING_... Man why can't girls be like men... I mean I can cum if a girl isn't FRANKENSTEIN and just puts my penis in her mouth and doesn't bite. Or inserts my penis in her and rides around a while, pretty much no matter how. (Sure the level of satisfaction can change, but I'm still EASY.)
But making a girl cum... ROCKETSCIENCE! I mean.. it requires AT LEAST 1.21 GIGAWATTS! And we all know that's nearly impossible. You can't just walk into any grocery store for your quick fix of plutonium and no one can predict where a lightning strikes! I.. think I lost track at some point...

BUT ANYWAY; that's why I just fap. No hassle. And I always win. Girls are too damn complicated for me to bother with em right now. (Been a single for a few years the first time in my life [I'm 26.. came out of the womb just to land on a babygirl. Who woulda thought?!... Well no. :D Just meant "my whole life" as in first time in a LONG time.])

And damn I'm happy to be satisfied with my penis. Man it would suck to have one of those micropenises.. I mean only seeing an image of one makes me sad.

Hey, maybe I should buy my penis a cake to show my appreciation for once!.... wait, what did I just

[–] FairlyTwisted 13 years ago

I like your post, you must be good in bed. It's nice to know there are guys out there who know it actually takes knowledge to make a woman have an orgasm. But no woman should expect a man to know it all by himself. Like you said, every woman is different and every woman should tell (directly or indirectly) her man how to satisfy her. Otherwise, it's her loss. It's really not rocketscience, it only depends on how open a girl is to talk about herself that way. I'm still working on that one...
But you seem to know some facts, that's cool. Don't give up on women just yet.

P.S.- I like Back to the Future too!

Jesus is coming-look busy!

[–] rbhatia1984 13 years ago

this movie was like those fake erotic stories which i used to read on porn sites when we had only pics and not videos, when most of the times, our imagination was at work

in fact i think the script of this movie has been taken from various 3rd rate stupid erotic stories, and then mixed into 1

only thing that kept me watching the movie was nudity, and hope to watch a good sex scene

[–] CaptainTiddlywinks 11 years ago

I won't in good conscience consider the opinion of a person that spells thoroughly as "thurally", especially when these forums come equipped with a spell checker.

[–] Jyveturkey 13 years ago

He was in a flacid state and was probably nervous. He's probably around 6 inches erect, which is average. So, the scene with them having sex standing would be easily achieved.

[–] Stoshie 13 years ago

What stood out for me in this movie was - I have never seen so many people drinking out of obviously empty cups!

This is a trend that is obvious in many movies and TV shows. Watch Law and Order: SVU, and you will see people drinking out of coffee cups that are clearly empty. Same with NCIS. Heck, the same is true of virtually any movie or TV show that has people drinking out of paper or plastic cups. You would think someone on the sets would notice this, and ask the actors to do a better job of pretending the cups had something in them.

Oh, and my noticing this also shows just what a bad movie this was, since I was distracted and bored enough to pay more attention to that than the movie itself. One star. Maybe two, if I am feeling generous. Those of you who liked this movie - huh? Was this maybe among the first movies you ever saw, and you had nothing to compare it too? I enjoy dumb teen comedies, but this was just painfully boring.

[–] Razar_C-1 12 years ago

I just want to say how much I hate, how much I truly despise the term "down there"... It's as if the people who use that term are afraid of their own genitals and the genitals of those around them. As though they are ashamed that they have genitals... It sounds like they are trying to distance themselves from their own (and others) genitals, by saying "Down There," instead of treating it like any other body part......

Anyway, it's just a pet peeve of mine I thought I'd mention.

Peace out

-- Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most...

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 12 years ago

[deleted]