Ridiculous Movie


Can Bollywood stop copying Godfather? Yes Godfather is great movie but putting it into Bollywood dish adding sleazy romance to it, stupid songs and wooden terrible actors is not exactly a 'Great' movie.

Actor potential is completely wasted in this film. Nana patekar and Ajay Devgan are two great actors but their role is reduced. Then there is spotlight on the oh-so pair Katrina and Ranbir. Ranbir tries to hard copy Pacino and FAILS miserably...........and Katrina? She dons sarees and tries to look elegant but I suggest she should have had a few acting lessons first.

reply

Very true.


Life can be a comedy or a tragedy, it all depends on how you look at it.

reply

Godfather is a book and any film maker from any part of the world has the right to make their film version of the book, so it's not really copying ''The Godfather" it's just being inspired by it. Plus it was not just inspired by that, it was an adaptation of several books.

reply

Sorry, they didn't adapt from the Godfather novel, they lifted entire scenes from the film. The scene where Samar leans over Veerendra's man (plump elderly guy) telling him not to insult him by lying, the dead masseur/lover covered in blood, the car exploding while Prithvi goes running to stop Sarah from opening the car door, the moment before that when Prithvi asks the retreating driver where he's going off to - those and more are lifted from the Godfather movie, not the book. Then they threw in some lame Karan angle from Mahabharata and pretty much stuffed this movie up beyond repair.
I am so disappointed in Prakash Jha for such a lazily thought out, lazily executed movie. And it's a hit! That's the most depressing. What's wrong with Indian audiences? This film is complete *beep* next to Gangaajal and even Apaharan. I hope Jha gets his movie-making mojo back soon coz this was a travesty.

reply

[deleted]

I thoroughly agree, the background scoring was dire. Individual pieces were quite Hollywoodish but the use of tracks was terrible. There was music in every fricken scene. A suspenseful scene with suspenselful music would cut to a lighter romantic moment where lo and behold, romantic music would play. How amateur can you get. This film had a number of scenes that would have worked better without any generic "elevator" music jangling away in the background. The different music tracks in back to back scenes made the film feel even more fractured. Funnily enough, this was not the case in Gangaajal and Apaharan. Different sound designer here, methinks.

I also agree about the performances. Ranbir Kapoor cannot act beyond the usual flip 20-something type, which is essentially him always playing himself. Sorry, but his parents were way more talented. It is excruciating to watch him pause a 100 times while delivering his sentences. In real life, people talk in one flow, all great actors know that. One can see he is trying hard, but we are never allowed to forget that he is performing. I agree, watching him channeling Pacino was painful. Abhishek Bachhan sucked at it as well in Sarkar. These second generation kids just don't have the heft or the inner complexity required for such quiet, intense parts.
Manok Bajpai just hams it, tho' at least he manages to ring true some of the time. Arjun Ramphal veers between out of his depth to quite sincere. He was better than Ranbir. Katrina Kaif is charming and pretty and doesn't have much to do except look dewey-eyed or teary-eyed. At least Devgan looks alive and animated in Jha's films. And that Shruti Sheth, dear God. The half-baked sex (or foreplay?) scene with Ramphal while she kept asking for a seat at the same time...horrendous. I just cracked up. The singular, best performance came from Bajpai's right hand man - the plump, old grey-haired bloke who finds his lover killed in his own bed. I'm told he is Vinay Apte, a stalwart of Marathi theatre.
Compared to this farce, Gangaajal had an embarassment of riches in terms of talent...so many great performances.

reply