This movie sucks


Sorry, but it was terrible.

It seemed like it could have been good, but the acting was totally off, not the worst acting I've ever seen, but by no means good and some scenes were pretty laughable.

I'm assuming it was a low budget flick, it really looked that way, so maybe it was standard, not sure.

Overall I didn't enjoy it and will never watch it again. I'd also never recommend it to anyone, as it was also really boring.








What did people do before IMDB???

reply

I'm assuming it was a low budget flick, it really looked that way, so maybe it was standard, not sure.
IMDb lists the budget at $40,000. I believe that's about what they said on the commentary track.

Compare this to an Asylum flick (Sharknado, Snakes on a Train) - those usually have budgets that break $1 and are far worse in every single possible category that can be measured.

"No, not the mind probe!"

reply

I thought the acting was not too bad. But it played like a 1970's horror. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing I guess.

reply