MovieChat Forums > Stargate Universe (2009) Discussion > 4 years without Stargate, thx to this PO...

4 years without Stargate, thx to this POS


Thanks a lot, SGU

reply

SGU was actually the best series, a shame it was the shortest.

April 25, 2024 - Flash Missing Vanishes in Crisis by Iris West-Allen.

reply

I agree.

I've just done a marathon viewing of all SG-1, SGA and SGU episodes in a row, and I liked SGU best.

SGU was a bit more adult though, in my opinion. It was also quite different from SG-1 and SGA, so I guess that's why many long time Stargate fans were disappointed in it and it was cancelled.

I like all 3 shows, though.


What we do in life echoes in eternity Russell Crowe as General Maximus in Gladiator (2000)

reply

I have just done the same except I'm still in the middle of SGU (I did see it when it aired).

I agree it's the most serious of the three. It was almost to serious, to grim. I don't come away from most episodes feel good. Even when the group "wins" there's always something terrible to go a long with it. I would prefer one or two settings less on the misery dial.

I like the show and the OP or anyone else who thinks it's bad sci-fi is challenged in some way.



No Sitcoms! No Sports! No Reality!

reply

Probably cause SGU was more a spin-off of BSG than SG1/SGA, i'm guessing you like bsg more than sg, wich is perfectly fine, but imagine if they did a BSG spin-off that 95% resembled
Stargate(sg1 or sga) . I wonder if BSG fans would like it, and if it would last more than 1 season.

reply

Just check out how "well" Caprica was received..

reply

Concur - by far the best of the lot.

reply

What are you smoking, it was the worst and an insult to the entire franchise.

reply

And how old are you - 12? The initial two SG series were kiddie-pop; basically live action Saturday morning cartoons with an almost total lack of depth. SGU was actual thought-provoking, adult entertainment (yes modelled after BSG which is arguably the best sci-fi series of all time) that didn't always have a rosy ending to episodes. Much more satisfying to those who live in the real world. I will agree with you though that, to those who identify with SG-1 and SGA, it likely is an insult to the franchise as such.

reply

I feel SGU would've been a much better, and better received, show if it hadn't been forced into the Stargate franchise.

After 15 seasons of SG-1 and Atlantis, there were too many specific expectations as to what a Stargate show would be, and how it would work.

reply

Ask your mommy for a quarter and ride your tricycle to your Walmart and stick the quarter into the bubblegum machine.

reply

No, it sucked pretty hard. The basic idea was good, and it could've been a good show, but the writing was just awful.

reply

some just have bad taste in tv shows.

sg1 was good till they killed off dr jackson and then they realised it was dumb but dragged on a plot to bring him back, they added the two b-grade actors from the cheesy farscape and then ruined the show even more with the ori crap.

sg1 was also good till the did a character shakeup and then did dull story arcs that dragged.

sgu was just a ripoff of bsg with soapy acting and was way too dark and moody.

ds9 got pretty dark at times with the grim war plot as the series progressed but at least it was well acted and had plenty of humor, drama and action.

reply

sg1 was good till they killed off dr jackson and then they realised it was dumb but dragged on a plot to bring him back,


Saying they realized it was dumb implies that they had a choice in the matter, which they then regretted - The actor left, forcing them to write him out as a series regular and when he decided he wanted to come back they wrote him back in.

And they didn't kill him off either. They very clearly had him survive in another form.

reply

I don't think SGU is to blame for the fact that they haven't made a new SG show for the past couple of years.

I haven't seen every episode of each show, however I did see a bit of the first SG-1, and compared to that I liked SGU much better. In fact, I'm a bit sad it got cancelled so soon.

Maybe they haven't made a new SG show simply because they haven't got any new ideas to build on? No matter the popularity of a TV show there comes a time when it has just lived out it's time. This could very well be the case with SG, IMO.

reply

I haven't seen every episode of each show, however I did see a bit of the first SG-1, and compared to that I liked SGU much better. In fact, I'm a bit sad it got cancelled so soon.


Even serious Sg-1 fans aren't fond of the first season or so. The general consensus is that Sg-1 was one of those shows that took some time to find its footing and would never have made it if it premiered today on a big network. However, because it was on Showtime, which didn't put a lot of pressure of it, it was allowed to grow and, ultimately, turn into the show that made people fans of it. When that shift occurs varies based on who you talk to. For me, it was the last few episodes of season 1 that did it and although there are some weak moments in season 2 I'm not as hard on it as other people are. Some of those others largely write off the first two seasons and say it got good shortly thereafter.

reply

For me, the shift occurred at the end of Season 3. Remember watching it on Sky One (UK) back in 1999 or something and they were promoting the Season 3 SG-1 finale. Watched it and was blown away. Became an SG fan after that and watched the show religiously even over Star Trek. SG1 was good but Atlantis blew me away as well. Nothing to date has beaten the feeling of anticipation when SG-1 and Atlantis ran concurrently on TV - You could look forward to 2 doses of SG every week! Seasons 3-8 of SG-1 and 1-3 of Atlantis was some of the best stuff I've ever watched although the other seasons had a lot of memorable moments.

SG: Universe had barely anything interesting in it. The ship (Destiny) was an interesting concept and I was intrigued by "The Message" storyline (And still hope that they wrap it up somehow in the future) but that's about it. Didn't care about any of the characters except Eli and Rush, and the weekly episodes were generally bland and boring because they kept dragging things along. They tried making it realistic which is not what SG fans watched SG for. They wanted new viewers, saw the success of Battlestar Galactica and tried to emulate it. Hope they're happy that they failed considering people at the time were shocked at the decision to cancel Atlantis for a new show.

reply

SG:U IS to blame. They cancelled SG:A for a show that a lot of fans didn't want and wasn't really needed. Subsequently, SG:U flopped and killed the SG franchise for now the same way that Enterprise flopped and killed Star Trek on TV. Sure, there were other factors like rising wages, the strength of the Canadian Dollar etc but, at the time, that's what people thought and generally still do. I don't remember the exact figures because it's been a while but I think Atlantis had around 1.5 million viewers for its season 5 finale but Universe had something like 1 million for its season 2 finale? And the ratings were dropping like a stone with each passing episode from the very first episode. Hell, I started skipping through episodes by the middle of Season 1 with tears in my eyes over what they had done to my beloved franchise. Just a horribly boring series.

Don't get me wrong - If they gave an SG-1/Atlantis feel to the show but keeping the basic premise intact about Destiny and its mission, it would've been far more successful than it was.

reply

How is it SGU to blame? I'm a hardcore SG fan and I loved Universe. There was a need for a change, because where's the fun in having the same plot device over and over on every SG show, which is "explore a new planet, find baddies to shoot at, then come home all good and well" And that "...for a show that a lot of fans didn't want and wasn't really needed" is your personal opinion. It's not a fact. Some fans simply got angry that they lost Atlantis for something new and went on bashing it left and right until the moment SGU got cancelled and they realized what just happened - no more SG forever. So many potential SGU viewers were put off by reading negative comments (like yours) about the show from angry fans, who already made up their minds. If Atlantis didn't get cancelled, I'm sure SGU would still be here.

Hell, I started skipping through episodes by the middle of Season 1 with tears in my eyes over what they had done to my beloved franchise. Just a horribly boring series.


Seriously? Do you really want every SG show to be like SG1? Same concept, same methods, same everything, just different people, planet and galaxy? Because that's what SGU WASN'T. I'm sorry, but the light humor of both SG1 and SGA got old. In my opinion, SGA was the weakest show. The moment our people started working with wraiths to fight more wraiths, it was already too late. Atlantis couldn't have survived another season with or without SGU.

reply

You misunderstand me in that I have no problem with change. With that said, negative reviews are not why people didn't watch. Are you serious in saying that potential fans care about what people are saying on the internet? SG-1 fans weren't happy with Atlantis but that didn't stop people watching it. The Atlantis premiere had about 3.5 million watching it and the Season 5 finale had 2 million people watching it - As you can see, for 5 seasons, that's not bad in terms of ratings. Contrast that with Universe where you had 2.4 million watch the premiere and saw it plummet to 1.1 million by the end of Season 2 - Barely 2 whole seasons and the ratings fell through the floor. Eli, Rush and Greer were my favourites but the other characters were bland and I didn't care much for them.

Don't get me wrong though, Universe wasn't that bad. When the "Message" storyline came along, it piqued my interest. However, amongst other storylines, the show just wasn't that interesting overall. You may disagree with that but that really is just your opinion. The only thing you can rely on is the numbers, and the numbers said that people didn't care that much about the show so it got cancelled. End of. Deal with it, dude.

reply

I'm also a hardcore x or y but, saying that, Season 1 of SGU was REALLY poor and, as above, did try to emulate BG (Which was a fantastic show). Season 2 changed things a little and was vastly superior.

Remember the stones... That was trying to bring the humanity portion into the show but it was boring as hell.

reply

Hell, I started skipping through episodes by the middle of Season 1 with tears in my eyes over what they had done to my beloved franchise. Just a horribly boring series.


Yes i did the same, and i felt the same, every episode was so gloomy and not in a good way like in a GoT episode, no the real life kind of gloomy, at the end of every episode i just wanted to cut myself to feel something.
But that's how mutch i loved the SG as a whole and i didnt want it to end even if every episode of SGU was torture to watch.

reply

the real life kind of gloomy, at the end of every episode i just wanted to cut myself to feel something.


It seems like you have bigger problems in your life than SGU.

reply

SGU was great. All the people whining about how SGU was too different from SG1 are what killed the franchise.

reply

Er, what? SGU was written as a BSG/Voyager clone and tried to get new viewers to watch by trying to ride the waves that BSG left. It failed in all aspects - New viewers didn't flood in and long-term SG fans left because the series was rubbish. Stop making s*** up.

reply

Having similarities to other shows doesn't make it a clone. TV in general was moving towards the serious tone that BSG had. Not all long term SG fans left SGU, it was only the really immature fans who can't handle change of any kind. Original Star Trek fans were in a similar outrage when Star Trek: the Next Generation first debuted, though now days ST:TNG is viewed as superior over the original.

SGU actually reinvigorated the SG franchise for a lot of long term fans - the ones who got bored of SG1 and SGA using the same formula for over a decade. If you thought repeating the same formula SG1 had would have helped SGU keep the ratings, you are wrong, as SGA didn't have much better ratings than SGU, and SGA was ar right clone of SG1.

reply

Actually the debate as to which is superior... TOS or TNG... still goes on today. Though what is generally agreed upon is that TNG was complete **** when it first debuted. The characters acted like smug ********, frequently declaring themselves superior to the alien race of the week. Thankfully the writing started to improve in the second season.

Regardless, decades had passed between TOS and TNG. In between which we had several movies which had already begun to drastically alter the tone for Star Trek. In contrast less than a year had passed between Atlantis and Universe, resulting in a serious mood whiplash for perspective fans.

reply

I've said it before, but what they really needed to do was air both Atlantis and SGU at the same time. Back when the Sci fi channel had a proper Friday night programming block during the summer their ratings were stellar. Their decision to break them up and air them (largely by themselves) against heavy competition in order to chase their year round programming ambitions is what led to each show dying off one by one.

Part of what made their old format so successful was not just that they had a programming block or that it didn't have heavy competition, but that the shows were different enough to attract a varied audience, but not so different as to turn those viewers completely off to all but the show(s) they liked (initially Stargate wasn't moved, meaning BSG's absence from the block caused the ratings decline). You the lighter toned Stargates starting the evening off and then the darker toned BSG wrapping things up. People would complain all the time that Stargate or BSG was bad based on their preference for either darker or lighter toned programming, but they would watch both anyway. You had people who were fans of BSG that wouldn't normally have watched Stargate, but made a night out of it by showing up earlier and you had the same kind of Stargate fans who would stick around for that extra hour.

It was a massive mistake to give that up and also a mistake not to realize that they needed to go back to it. If they kept Atlantis for a little bit longer and paired it with SGU plus another show (maybe Sanctuary) on Fridays, in the summer, they would have had the kind of ratings that they wanted. There would have been Atlantis fans that would have complained about SGU because of its tone, but because it was Stargate and because it would be on at the same time, they'd watch it. Meanwhile, the new fans that SGU attracted would have also been more inclined to watch Atlantis despite similar tonal complaints.

By the time Atlantis wrapped, SGU might have had a chance to find its legs. Although you're not going to make people who favor lighter programming fans of darker programming, that plus the removal of the perception that it was replacing the show they liked would have made them more inclined to stick with it.

That's actually not too far off from what Star Trek did when they developed Deep Space Nine. It had a different kind of tone than TNG did and there were long term fans that weren't happy with it, but they were often exposed to it because it would air next to TNG in syndication and it was Star Trek so they were more inclined to watch it than they would have been had it premiered in a void after all other Trek shows wrapped up.

reply

SGU was similar in its somewhat dark feel to BSG as opposed to the light-hearted escapism of SG-1 and SGA and shared the "spaceship lost far from home" setting with Voyager but, otherwise, there was not a lot of plagiarism of these shows that I could detect. But you are correct in that the established SG fan base was not prepared to watch a thought-provoking, adult series that focused on relationships between non black and white characters rather than mindless "cowboy" action scenes.

reply

I agree that too many people wanting it to be like SG1 is what helped kill it. I really liked it for the most part.

reply

your right the fanboys started ripping it apart before it even aired,i never seen a show attacked with so much hate before sgu.so the fanboys have no one to blame but themselves.

reply

SGU was great. All the people whining about how SGU was too different from SG1 are what killed the franchise.


So let me get your reasoning straight as I sit here laughing.
You thought it was great, but the overwhelming number of people that tuned out (myself included) caused it to fail.
You obviously don't seen the logic in that.

I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away.

reply

SGU turned into a good show, but it was conceived as a series much closer to BattleStar Galactica than to either SG-1 or SG:A. Honestly, a little bit of rewriting could have eliminated all of the Stargate references from the series, and it would have been fundamentally the same show. If the show would have been less about trying to replicate the BattleStar Galactica formula, and more in line with SG-1 and SG:A, I think it would have done a lot better. SGU was weakest the more it tried to be BattleStar Galactica, and strongest when it was more like Stargate. It got better as time went along, but by then most viewers had forgotten about it.

reply

I don't see at what point it started being more like SG1. The stories got better, because SGU focused early episodes on character development, which caused you to care more when the stakes were raised in big story arcs. Unfortunately, the character focused episodes bored a lot of people who wanted more action. However, those of us who understand character episodes are important to any iconic series saw the show was attempting to tell a story on a more grand scale than SG1 ever attempted. It's too bad the writers were just getting started and couldn't finish.

reply

I see no similarity at all to BSG, except in a more serious tone and a long story arc . . . which basically puts them in line with many shows I could name. In what ways do you think SGU and BSG are similar? Because I'm not seeing it. At all.

reply

I thought the other SG series were too lite and fun.

reply

"POS"? Apparently, you're one of those fanboys who killed it by having a tantrum about it before it was even on the air. Awww, change is haaaard. Whassamatter, not enough things go "boom"?

Face it: The cutesy SG1 adventure-of-the-week formula was getting so stale you couldn't sell it on the clearance rack.

Having watched all three, "Stargate Universe" was my favorite of all the Stargate series, and I loved its serious tone, its moral questions, the character exploration, and the unfolding of its big mysteries. The actors--like BAFTA-winning Robert Carlyle--and effects were top notch; the writing was sleek and brilliant. You can dislike SGU if you want, but it definitely was not a "POS".

reply

[deleted]

The OP's sentiment may have been a bit harsh, but it is somewhat correct. The few people on this board who liked the series must see that, from the other comments, many fans of the SG community did not like "Universe" at all.

For one, it was far too grim--almost morbidly so. I watch no television at all. What entertainment I do watch is hand-picked from online offerings. And I prefer to watch shows that entertain with at least a nod to real-life situations. And human character being what it is, even the grimmest situations bring humor, even if it is only dark--or black--humor.

Let's face it. SGU took itself too seriously. Worse yet, it seemed to completely ignore the reactions, or expected reactions of its core audience base. Coming as they did from the existing SG fan base, the people most likely to watch the series, at least at first, would expect to have an SG "feel" show being offered. But such was not the case.

I, too, was completely put off by the relentless, soul-sapping blackness of every episode. The characters were darkly humorless, their situations were hopeless or worse (if that even seems possible), and the story arcs, while long-term, did nothing to relieve these anxieties in the short term. If I want grim, hopeless reality, I need only to turn off my computer--or change "channels" to the news websites. I watch shows to escape this grimness. But with SGU this was not possible.

I cannot recall watching a SINGLE episode that was imbued with hope of any kind. And the only characters on the show who had ANY hope for happiness were the ones who ditched the ship for life on a planet that SEEMED like a paradise, but with all of the mysteries surrounding its mere existence and ultimate purpose, it could have been, in truth, Hell, for all they knew. At least they had a chance for more positive emotions than those to which the viewers were exposed.

In fact, due to the unrelentingly negative grimness of the show, I simply stopped watching it during mid-second-season. And I have no desire ever to return. And with the exception of "Farscape," which turned out to be simply too silly for me, that otherwise has never happened. If I put in the time to warm up to a show, especially after a season and a half, I invariably finish watching the series...no matter how challenging may be the premise. The fact that SGU surpassed every other show that I can ever remember watching, both in hopelessness and seeming futility, alike--for both the characters and the audience--says it all.

And while everyone's tastes differ, I am hard-pressed to imagine what type of personality would find unrelenting, utter hopelessness entertaining (perhaps apocalyptic, conspiracy-theorist, doomsday "true believers"? But that is simply wild speculation...). Perhaps they are people who have far too much happiness in their own lives? ...Or the exact opposite? Who can truly say? All that I know is that, at least on other boards, the ones who liked SGU the most seemed to be abusive, bitter, narcissistic loners. Not that my observations apply here, but again, who can truly say?

All that I know for certain was that merely watching SGU was so unpleasant of an experience that after each and every episode I felt like I needed a drink and a comedy show viewing just to offset the negative impact of every episode. It felt like coming home from a funeral after each viewing. It was that terrible of a feeling. Is it any wonder that I cannot tolerate the thought of ever watching another episode? And judging by the comments that I have read both here and elsewhere, I am far from alone in my feelings about SGU. As sad as it is for the entire Stargate franchise, thank God it was cancelled when it was. You know, before it had time to destabilize governments and grossly affect the suicide rate, planet wide.

I truly hope that there will be, someday soon, a new entry in the Stargate franchise. Hopefully, it will be uplifting and occasionally humorous. Until that time, though, I will have to entertain myself with reruns of the other Stargate franchise entries. Based on the feelings of happiness and feelings of hope that the other entries engendered, I will have to enjoy the reruns until something new and, hopefully, even better comes along. However, if that never happens, I will have to be content with what already exists until something different and just as exciting is created...if ever.

Just drive down that road, until you get blown up --Patton, to reconnaissance troops

reply

It's indeed fascinating to have someone else's perspective on the show. You've written a long piece about why you don't like it, and that explains your feeling on the matter. I won't respond with an equally long piece, but a couple of points. You and I would not get along entertainment-wise, because you dislike two of my all-time favorite shows: SGU and Farscape, one of which you think is too dark, and the other too silly. And while I might be considered by some to be bitter, I'm not abusive, nor am I (I think!) narcissistic.

I do understand your concern about unrelenting darkness, and I think it was ameliorated at times, but there were some stretches of episodes that could have used something more uplifting More clues about Rush's interest in Ascension, perhaps, though maybe the creators didn't want to focus on that too much because SG1 had done so, and were trying to set this show apart.

I rewatched SGU recently, and I'm trying to remember which episodes where I thought something similar. It was particularly slow-moving and dreary some episodes into the first season, IIRC, and I think that hurt the show. However, they were finding their groove, and, if you ever read Joseph Mallozzi's (writer and producer on the Stargates) website, the viewership was on the climb in the second season. (Graphs about a third of the way down the page.)
https://josephmallozzi.wordpress.com/2014/03/29/march-29-2014-the-houseguests-t-v-graphs-howd-the-stargates-fare/

reply

Random thoughts... SGU was a great idea. Poorly executed. The idea of that ship was fascinating and exploring it could have lasted several seasons.

Way too many unlikable characters.

The love triangles were a drag on the real plot -exploration.

I can't think of who was the franchise's most annoying SG character, Eli or Rodney McKay.

Annoying stuff like; why, with all those scientists on the ship, would a senator's daughter go on off-world expeditions.

Anyway, frustrating that they left it with that manchild on the observation deck, grinning like an idiot.

reply

I thoroughly enjoyed it with the other Stargate shows but I think focusing on exploring the ship for several seasons would get boring fast. I enjoyed the fact that it was so dark because if you think about it SG-1 and Atlantis all teams went in knowing there would be life and death risks/came as prepared as they could/had the perfect team hand picked for the job while Universe you had people who were never supposed to go/were never prepared themselves/were not prepared to go at all period. Off the bat in my mind I was ready for a different Stargate show that wouldn't be the same and I actually wanted that.

We had 10 years of SG-1 and 5 years of Atlantis which were both great shows (except last 2 seasons of SG-1 in my opinion but that's because I hated Mitchell and if they weren't going to continue with O'Neil they should have left it at that) so to continue with the same exact formula in another location I feel would just have been a lazy attempt to grab more money.

As for the characters I hated Rodney McKay at first but half way thought Atlantis my opinion of him changed and enjoyed the dynamic of the group but Eli I liked from the start.

As for the senator's daughter they explained in the 1st episode that the senator got the funding for the project and wanted to see the fruits of his funding labor and his daughter worked for him. It was even mentioned by her how she is useless which is why I think they did all that have her be half alien stuff to keep her relevant since hooking up with the 2nd in command wasn't enough.

What I hated were the filler episodes but thankfully there didn't seem to be that many but when they showed up oh man did it slow down everything.

All the Stargate shows had their ups and downs. I am re-watching SG-1 and there are some episodes where I just want to smack myself in the head. For example there was an episode in the 1st season where a girl had a stargate bomb in her and Carter decides to stay and die with her *smack in the forehead*. Cmon Carter you spend what 24-48 hours with her and you're willing to give up your life just so she won't die alone and you had a "feeling" she wouldn't die? Now if she brought her down and then said she wasn't coming back up because she had a theory that it wouldn't explode and she didn't say anything because no one would have believed her I would have found plausible.

I just wish they made a movie closure but knowing that season 2 wasn't even released on blu-ray it would be a lost cause which is unfortunate.

Hopefully with the reboot will come a new outlook and if all goes well maybe a reboot of the series as well and not just the movies.

reply

Sorry for the delay, but I do appreciate your thoughtful answer. It is sometimes difficult these days to find differing opinions on any particular subject that don't veer off into a war of words, or even worse...

As for your response, as ever, opinions differ widely, as do tastes. And, I suppose, that's one of the things that makes the world go 'round.

reply

I am a huge SG fan and really really really wanted SGU to succeed. Unfortunately I started to dread watching what became a BSG clone. Had they stayed with exploring Destiny and the struggle to survive I believe ratings would have leveled out for the long haul. Instead SyFy panicked and the result was a weird mashup of Lost-The Matrix-Bodysnatchers. The body switching rape scenes, Rush's psychic bond with the ship and Ely's virtual girlfriend ruined even the memory of the show for me.
BTW, who thinks Eli never bothered to work on the hypersleep chamber and just "Hung Out" with his virtual girl until they got to the other galaxy? Come to think of it he could have peacefully explored that darned ship for parts and resources without Rush interrupting until he stumbled onto the hydroponics bay................

www.DronesOverLouisville.com

reply

I just wish they would make a movie about what actually happens. If you can leave us hanging for 4 years atleast make a movie and finish what the actual story is. They extended SG!, cut SGA short, and Kill this this show was amazing like The Tomorrow People. I think had they given it more time the show would have grown. But instead they leave us on a massive Cliff Hanger. it pisses me off they keep crap shows and kill new borns likle this I still watch SG-1. SGA was ok but tworads the endso drawn out. Please make a movie i don't care if it's Animated just finish the story. I know it would save on the cost of custom building the sets. Please

reply