Sounds better than it is.


I heard about this documentary and it sounded cool. But it's kinda B.S. The only reason he made this doc. is because he wanted to sell his book. Basically it's about this New York writer and his wife and daughter, who obviously are pretty well off, since she spent tons of money on designer clothes. I think she spent over $900 on a pair of boots. And the wife is almost 40 and has never cooked a meal in her life, so they spent tons on money on take out and starbucks. So to sell his book, they basically drastically change their life by living carbon free for a year. But they keep cheating. They end up having no electricity, but they have cell phones and laptops. So this is very flawed. The wife even talks about how she cheats a lot on it. It's really all a publicity stunt to sell book, have people see the doc and now it looks like they got a movie deal out of it. I'm all for people doing things to help the planet, but this doc really didn't show me anything that I didn't know. If you watch a movie like Food Inc., you learn a lot more about why to buy locally and how food companies are really putting out poor quality food and all. They live in NYC, but have a car. If you live and work in NYC, you don't need a car. You can take the subway, walk or take the bus. I'm sure (if they did do this for a year) that they changed they way they do things. Like maybe the wife will actually cook food instead of getting take out every night. But now they've made even more money, so I'm sure she's buying tons of clothes. I just think it was a gimmick, not really something to help the environment. Anyone who really wants to lower their carbon foot print, would've done so without this doc and could've looked up how to do it online.

reply

I hate to admit it, but I think you're right, Cobb. I was disappointed in the movie, having expected it to be more rigorous. FOOD, INC. is the movie to see that will inspire real, substantive action. NO IMPACT MAN is simply fun and a quirky take on trying to eliminate the footprint, but isn't likely to convert those not already on board and committed to ecological action.

The website is encouraging public screenings of NO IMPACT MAN for Earth Day (for a $50 licensing fee, which includes a copy of the DVD). I liked the idea, but am going to show FOOD, INC. instead to students.

I saw Colin Beavan at a college event recently and came away even more convinced this whole project was a gimmick that turned out to be a goldmine. He didn't strike me as especially committed. By his own admission, he's first and foremost a writer and that came to mind when during a panel discussion on sustainable lifestyle adjustments he was more interested in quibbling and arguing against the term "sustainable" in favor of the term "eco-effectiveness." He never offered any suggestions on how to live out the lifestyle by whatever name it goes by.

I was tempted to ask whether he had slipped back into the bourgeois bohemian lifestyle he and his family were enjoying before the project, but didn't. Chickened out. Maybe I didn't want to know. I was really inspired by the book.

reply

I agree. They cheated so often I wondered why they even bothered releasing the film. It's like someone who quits smoking, but still sneaks a few a week.

This family was about as "no impact" as your average homeless guy.

reply

Why should SHE cook? He was the one who did all the family's cooking.

reply