MovieChat Forums > The 25th Anniversary of WrestleMania (2009) Discussion > Undertaker Vs. Shawn Micheals shoulda be...

Undertaker Vs. Shawn Micheals shoulda been the main event !!!

posted 15 years ago by sinister_edge
12 replies | jump to latest

who else agrees with me?

thats the one the writers shoulda known every one woulda wanted to see ,like c'mon!!!

You got two of the biggest names to come out of Texas! your holding your silver annivrsary in Texas! the hype for this was as big as Texas!!!

And th writing team, being expeireinced as they are, didnt have the foresight or common sense to put 'Taker vs Micheals in the main event.

Same cr@p happened with 'Taker vs Batista at Wm a fw years back, Taker at Wm should always be the main evnt if title matches are gonna be as lackluster as Orton vs. HHH.Or as predictable as a juan cena match.

seriously it didnt look like HHH was into the match, although Orton seemed somewhat into it.

come on Wwe! listen to your fans every now and then!

[–] thorwold 15 years ago

I consider it a great, great shame, that the couple of times they actually decided to put non title matches in the Main Event (8 and 11) the matches absolutely sucked, but when they actually have CAUSE to do so, like at 18 and now 25, they don't. I generally agree with the sentiment that the title match should be the main event, but in these two instances, there was just no way to follow Hogan-Rock and Taker-Michaels, I mean I guess there WAS...but anyone with half a brain could see it was never going to happen on either occasion.

God's finest creation!
http://www.spz.udaff.com/img/monicaB097.JPG

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] queen_g_shine 15 years ago

I AGREE!

[–] macabre-6 15 years ago

Absolutely, and I thought it would be. Easily the best match of the night.

[–] blythblue 15 years ago

Definatley shoulda been the main event. I fell asleep watchin orton and HHH.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] sinister_edge 15 years ago

"By the way, I was legitimately surprised when HBK kicked out of the first Tombstone."

yes excactly! this had evrything a Wrestlemaina main event shoulda had.

[–] AndyWarth 15 years ago

Taker-Michaels wuz a classic and it definitely should have been main event. there wuz just too much hype for this. Having Cena then wuz completly anti climatic. It could have been a Retirement Match, a grudge match, a whatever match. I just hope they reply this at Backlash, and this time, without the Strak pressure, Michaels wins. He's the greatest performer this show has ever had, and there will never be another Michaels. Having him against the all important and loved (myself included of course) Taker, is just what they both deserve: a feud against someone that is up to them.

Had Jack Bauer been a Spartan, the movie would be called "1"

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] bmicha20015 14 years ago

HBK vs. Taker not being the main event wasn't why WrestleMania 25 didn't work. It didn't work because the rest of the card was fairly weak. Yes there were some enjoyable matches, but every other match was weak. WrestleMania 20 had a great match as it's main event, but it's still the worst WrestleMania ever.