Umm Same movie but worse


The first movie was funny. I didnt know what was going on because it seemed like it was the same movie as 2004 version. I mean the whole trip, boat. I mean even similar jokes about bringing beer on the trip. The old guy with the long beard. Then the whole earth child thing (even got shot at in the tree again). Once i saw that part then i knew they did nothing but try to make the other movie. Was this just a parody of the first???????????? This was horrible. I did not laugh once.

reply

I fully agree, I cringed at the start how it started with them as young kids. From there i knew it was gunna be a stupid rip off of the 1st one. Especially when on their way in the car they stop at that hick town and the locals tell them scary *beep* blah blah blah. What a waste of rental money this film was. The long beard guy was a f+cken joke. along with the eco ladies. THE worse bit though was the squirrels and the humming bird. OMG the animation was so *beep* I could seriously rant about this movie all day but I gotta go lol.

ps. No thought went into this movie at all.

0.1/100

reply

Yeah. Just saw it. Wow really, really bad. Not the worst movie I have ever seen bad, but still really bad. I agree that the squirrel and hummingbird part was absolutely stupid, came out of nowhere, and had nothing to do with anything. What a waste of time.

reply

I have to agree! I've only seen without a paddle once so when I saw "without a paddle" on the tv menu I just assumed it was the original. I honestly thought it was the first one until after 5 minutes. Gotta say it looked pretty lame. Even more so than the first...but I must admit I liked Without A Paddle.

reply

I didn't even need to see this movie to know that it was gonna blow. It's the same old stupid idea of some producer to make a movie that blows and pretty much give it the same name of a movie that did well. It's complete crap because it ruins the names of good movies.

reply