MovieChat Forums > Noruwei no mori (2010) Discussion > Read the book first to appreciate it?

Read the book first to appreciate it?


What a terrible movie, the movie couldn't serve me in any way. The detached style in which the director tries to tell the story makes it virtually impossible for the viewer to feel any understanding or compassion for the main characters. The film is very slow and just touched me with beautiful visual images of the Japanese landscape. For the rest, the movie couldn't fascinate me at all. I must say that my neighbor next to me in the movie theater, certainly could appreciate the movie. He did read the book before watching this film and told me that after reading the book the film was a welcome addition. His wife, who sat next to him and as me didn't read the book, didnt share his opinion. Conclusion would be that you have read the book first to appreciate this film. But this film hasnt made me enthusiastic in any way to start reading the book.

reply

I think that's a good suggestion. I'm not sure if the movie is terrible, but the trailer looked promising. If you know the author and his works, I suspect the 'detached style' might very reflect the mood of the story. I've read the book and intend to re-read it, before I see the movie.

reply

I haven't seen the film but it might not hurt to see one of the director's earlier films as well since he has his own unique style that I think might fit in well with the book but maybe is not a style that a lot of people are used to.

reply

I hadn't read the book before seeing it at the Toronto Film Fest in September and I was quite pleasantly surprised by it. I was aware of the mixed/negative press from Venice but I personally enjoyed it a lot. In fact, while it definitely its flaws, it's only grown in my mind in the months since I saw it, to the point now where I'd put it somewhere in my Top 10 of 2010 and only under Black Swan of the 30 films that I saw at TIFF.

My initial reaction right after the screening (from my blog):

Norwegian Wood, by contrast, is a film which, despite some minor flaws, is dense with lyrical beauty and examines the gap between love and sex with a perceptive eye. It may be entirely too long and suffocatingly emotional for some, but the film has an honesty in its look at relationships that hits hard.

Based off the widely read book by Haruki Murakami, Tran Anh Hung's film is a coming-of-age story narrated by the main character, Watanabe (Ken'ichi Matsunaya) His best friend Kizuna commits suicide, leaving behind a girlfriend, Naoki (Rinko Kikuchi) who goes into severe depression and whom Watanabe falls in love with, despite her emotional turmoil. Simultaneously, a charismatic young woman, Midori (Kiko Mitsuhara), injects herself into his life.

Norwegian Wood is unusual in the way it lingers where other narratives would cut, leaving the viewer to explore Watanabe's relationships from a focus on sex and its ramifications, rather than love. While it has a bit of an episodic feel to it (no doubt due to the nature of adapting a book), the film builds its case and its power scene by scene, block by block so that it feels like a complete and exhaustive look into the mindsets of young people in love (or what they think is love) and lust.

It balances itself through the contrasts between Watanabe's relationship with the disturbed Naoki as well as the vibrant Midori. The development of all three characters feels honest and realistic throughout which allows the viewer to observe this triangle with a critical eye and see the repercussions it has on Watanabe.

One of the many highlights of the film is its observance of the relationship between one of Watanabe's friends, Nagasawa and his girlfriend Hatsumi. Hatsumi is aware that Nagasawa is cheating on her but continues to stay with him. In a heartbreaking dinner scene, she questions Watanabe's (and all men in general) need for sex despite his love for Naoki as Nagasawa looks on, indifferent to her feelings.

Jonny Greenwood scores the more lyrical shots with a beautiful guitar sound that could be an alternate introduction to Radiohead's Street Spirit (Fade Out). When necessary, his score has a discordant strength that may be overwrought to some but feels appropriate for the inner turmoil of the characters. It is as beautifully violent as the feelings they have, underscoring the dangers of their drowning obsessions with love and how it can affect them in such profoundly disturbing ways. By the same token, the film creates a violent poeticism in its gorgeous look and the camera movements (notably in the walking conversation shots), bringing the viewer into the world of these characters and their drowning obsessions but never leaving us adrift on the tidal waves that are their emotions.


"Little things. There's nothing bigger, is there?"

reply

[deleted]

The strange mood of the film is because it didn't developed the chacarters well. Even Watanabe, he's a quiet shy guy but in the book you can see his suffering and undestand him better. Also, the movie's mood could be saved by the cheerfulness of Midori, and the friendship from Reiko. If there's an uncut version (maybe 2:40) or a long version (more than 3 hours) I'm sure that the people that read the book will be satisfied, and the non-readers with the 2:40 or something would understand and enjoy more. But they'd need to add the first scene of the book where Watanabe listen to Norwegian Wood and starts to remember (that explains the title) and the scene where next to the fire Reiko tells her story.

If you are going to read ot readed the book I know you'll enjoy the story much more.

reply

Reading the book first definitely gives a you a better appreciation of the movie. Otherwise it might seem abrupt and slow.

reply

i read the book in 3-4 hours. it wasn't that deep.



We're not soldiers and he's not the enemy. He's a pizza man.

reply

I read the book for a book club and really enjoyed it. Watching the film now and it is kind of a depressing slog. I'd definitely recommend holding off on the movie until after reading the book. Even then, the style is pretty cold and spare... but I don't speak Japanese so maybe I am missing both culture and verbal cues.

reply

the book doesn't have much plot so it makes sense they would have slow things down.




I'm with the Mattress Police. There are no tags on these mattresses.

reply

you read a 400 page book in 3-4 hours? no wonder you didn't find it deep, you were obviously skimming, especially given the audiobook version is like 11 hours long. . .

3-4 hours? i don't think so. . .

reply

I thought it was beautiful and moving, and I haven't read the book.

reply

I hadn't read it (though I've read other Murakami books) and I loved the film. I don't mind not having everything explained to me though, I didn't think it was necessary. Human beings are complex and mysterious. I felt like that was a major theme: you can't know people. If you like art films, you can enjoy it anyway.

reply

I read the book in college during a very emotional time in my life. I fell in love with the book immediately, and read it twice during those 4 years. It made me laugh, it made me cry.

The movie did neither of these things, and I was completely appalled. The movie wasn't funny. The book was hilarious! I remember reading the book on the bus and laughing out loud during the scene with Midori and the protagonist. Everyone looking at me on the bus. Midori didn't have that same whimsical quality in the film.

The movie did not make me cry. Reiko's story felt washed out in the movie. In the book I was moved to tears, and put it up on the shelf as one of the greatest tragedies.

Word of advise: Read the book, but don't see the film. If you have seen the film, wait a year or two so the film doesn't taint your reading of the book (Jay Rubin's English Translation). For me, Norwegian Wood is still one of the best books of all time. And I am not in the minority. It is widely Murakami's most popular book with his works translated into 34 different languages.

reply

I didn't know this was based on a novel until I saw it listed in the end credits. This movie didn't rock my world or anything but I absolutely liked it. Rinko Kikuchi was quite good and my interest was kept for the full runtime, with a handful of scenes really striking a chord within me. It's not as expertly made as The Scent of Green Papaya, but terrible is the last word I would use to describe it. It's not as if the film is totally disjointed or sparse in the dialogue department. It's not at all hard to follow.

My IMDb lists: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur5570856/lists?ref_=nv_usr_lst_3

reply