Wth so many damn film "experts" I'd expect...
..there to be so many good films out there. Seems like you are all experts in films and always know what is exactly wrong with a film each time. I wonder where all of your films are??? hmmmm
share..there to be so many good films out there. Seems like you are all experts in films and always know what is exactly wrong with a film each time. I wonder where all of your films are??? hmmmm
shareMany of us are aficionados of horror movies and know the genre.
This movie had its good points indeed, but was overall a very bad movie. Except for the creepy opening scene, and the force and violence of a scene near the ending, this was basically a film for preteens and young teens. A lot of merchandising and marketing after this film came out was targeted to preteens and early teens. The "creatures" were more like a Disney Pixar film.
The 1973 film was pretty typical of Ghost Story format movies of its time. It has a cult following and left a lot to the imagination. Many people interpreted the film differently. But it left its mark on us.
Here's an exerp from Titans, Terrors and Toys (January 2012)
http://titansterrorstoys.blogspot.com/2012/01/dont-be-afraid-of-dark-a nd-gate-tiny.html
He says this about the original:
To be sure, the original version of Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark isn’t one of the best horror films
ever made. What made it memorable, though, is that it was made by talented people who
understood the significant limitations with which they were faced--especially in terms of a
meager production budget and the TV movie format--and successfully applied their skills within
those limits. In doing so, the movie not only kept the appearance of the monsters to a minimum,
but it also kept the details behind the monsters’ origin as vague as possible.
On the basis of what you see in the movie, you can piece together that the monsters were
probably summoned from another hell-like dimension through some kind of dark magic and then
couldn’t (or wouldn't) be sent away, although none of the characters say as much. You hear the
monsters much more than you see them, and what they say amongst themselves indicate just how
sadistic and obsessive they really are. By keeping the monsters vague--their origins, their
capabilities, and their intentions--the movie maintains eerie mood of tense uncertainty. Adding to the tension is how the presence of the monsters accentuates the growing rift between Sally and her husband Alex (Jim Hutton), all the way to the film’s grim, creepy conclusion.
To be a great filmmaker takes more than being able to tell stories around a campfire. There's a lot of elements in every shot that can leave an emotional or psychological impact on an audience, which can make or break a film. Truly, every shot of Guy Pearce and his horribly fake hair dye ruined every scene in this movie with him. BUT there were scenes or shots that do redeem some of the bad things.
Look at the Psycho shower scene. The way it's shot and edited together is a PERFECT example of storytelling on film.
Get off your soapbox while I play you a tune on the tiniest violin.