MovieChat Forums > L'armée du crime (2010) Discussion > This is good but a bit confusing (SPOILE...

This is good but a bit confusing (SPOILERS)


This French,French language film about a group of French resistance fighters is a good film.

I am glad I saw it and was moved by the drama.
I would say go and see it if you like war films or just want to see a film that will make you think.

(What would you do if your country/adopted country was invaded?would you help the police to round up the people causing trouble <or fighting back if you prefer>)

The film is good looking,Paris looks attractive even under Nazi occupation and a fascist Vichy government.

Perhaps it looks to attractive ?,it does not look run down enough for me and nobody complains about food or energy shortages.

I have read about the French resistance and this particular faction,but I still found the story confusing.

Was the group effective in its aims? or were they doomed heroes/heroines?
How many attacks did they actual carry out and how many fighters survived?
I know that DRANCY was a just built housing estate which was used to house rounded up jews but perhaps the filmakers assume to much knowledge of viewers,do most French people know the background to this story?


I don't want to be too critical,it is a dramatic film with good acting but it could have been a better film with dare I say some more Hollywood style dramatic licence?
Perhaps people with less of an obsession with history will just enjoy the film as a film.

I especially liked the locations,loved the 1930s Art Deco swimming pool and the street where they all stay.

reply

I know that DRANCY was a just built housing estate which was used to house rounded up jews but perhaps the filmakers assume to much knowledge of viewers,do most French people know the background to this story?


I'm not French so I can't answer that, but I think filmmakers assuming too much knowledge doesn't only apply here. Most non-English-speaking films get a limited release in English-speaking countries, so the filmmakers won't necessarily pander to the public outside of their native countries. There's more of a problem in my eyes with films made in English, which on the whole are distributed to a much wider audience.

For example, I'm from the UK and know nothing about baseball. What does .300 mean, for instance? It's never explained in films, and I wouldn't necessarily expect it to be. If I were American and a couple of minutes were wasted going through the rules, stats etc, I'd be tearing my hair out and marking the film down on IMDb

I think we can safely say a lot of French know about Drancy, in the same way that a lot of Americans know about .300.

reply

[deleted]

Good points ! I was being too critical of the film,ignoring the fact that the majority of the audience for the film would be French people who hopefully would know more of the background than English speaking Brits like me and you.

I take your point about American films but people in Britain drive me mad by pretending to understand obscure American references while being happy to be rude about our european neighbours and their films.

reply

[deleted]

BTW, .300 means that he is a DAMN good hitter!

I TRULY MISS STEVIE RAY VAUGHAN!

reply

WELL SAID!!!

reply

I too found the film confusing ... especially being an American who speaks no French. More so there are a lot of characters in the film that are not easily understood. Finally the beginning (died for France) really threw me off.

That said ... I elected to watch the film a second time ... after reading about it on IMDB. It is a very good film and is real eye candy!!!

reply