MovieChat Forums > Road to Hell (2017) Discussion > Playing in theaters soon?

Playing in theaters soon?


A friend who is a gigantic street of fire fan like me read that the film will be in a Texas theater this month. Does anyone know when it will be in theaters here in Miami area?

reply

Can't comment on what your friend has read, but all the information I've located on-line about this movie has stated that it was always intended to go direct-to-DVD. If it is getting shown in a cinema, I'm guessing that it's a one-off screening at a film festival.

reply

No, the OP was right about it playing in Texas- The Alamo drafthouse in Austin is doing a double feature thing with Streets of Fire and then Road to Hell with a talk back with I think the director? and one (or more?) of the actors... not sure about the talk back part but they are for sure showing Road to Hell... this monday in fact.

"Only talent interests a woman of taste"

"The unexamined life is not worth living"

reply

I was at the double feature mentioned below. Michael Paré and Deborah Van Valkenburgh were there, as were Albert Pyun and Cynthia Curnan.

While Streets of Fire with a receptive theatrical audience was absolutely spectacular, "Road to Hell" completely derailed what was a perfect evening.

It's garbage. Cinematic fan-fiction that is essentially a pointless 60+ minutes of atrocious dialogue in front of a green screen, mixed in with some black and white footage of Deborah Van Valkenburgh being interrogated and flashbacks of a poor double for Diane Lane singing and dancing to songs borrowed from "Streets of Fire." The computer animated backdrops used look like a screen savers circa 1994.

The two least interesting former strippers turned murderers in the world run into Tom Cody literally in the middle of nowhere.

They yell and swear and swear and yell. They talk a lot of nonsense. There's some blood and some kissing. It goes absolutely nowhere and it's just tediously boring. It could have been whittled down into a five minute short, told the same "story," and it STILL would have been painful.

It is vaguely interesting watching Paré and Van Valkenburgh reprising their respective roles, or at least it would be if the dialogue wasn't so mind numbingly awful.

Do yourself a big favor and stop caring about this now. It will only end in heartbreak.

reply

[deleted]

Yes,

could you please tell us more about the movie????

How does it end?And what happens to Cody?And what's with the blond lady Caitlin?

reply

Basically, it opens with "Cody's sister" being shown in grainy black and white footage being asked about why she thought "Cody" would have become a serial killer.

(Side note: since when would a sister, whose last name is also Cody, refer to her brother Tom as "Cody?" I can accept the cops calling him that, but she still would have called him Tom and not their shared last name. You'll notice little things like that. Basically they try to remain just vague enough to not get sued, even though it's very obvious these are supposed to be the characters from another work.)

From the opening, it cuts to two totally vapid (though fairly attractive) women driving in a jeep. It turns out they killed and/or robbed some people. Because lesbian strippers are awesome, we hear how much they love each other, and they kiss. Oh, and just to show you how gritty everything is, every other word out of their mouth is f---.

They see Cody by the side of the road, and decide for some reason to try and run him over. He doesn't move and instead blows out one of their tires.

They pull over, he walks up to him.

Then proceed about 40 minutes + of repetitive, circular dialogue. Cody and Caitlin (the meaner of the two girls) end up killing Ashely for some reason.

Caitlin and Cody make out some, but then he eventually kills her. But before she dies, we find out she has a baby hidden in the jeep. As she clings to life, she basically asks him to kill the child as well.

Then, here's where it gets fuzzy. Of the three of my groups of friends who didn't walk out, we can't agree exactly how it ends. I honestly think we were so traumatized that we've blocked it out. We all seem to recall it sort of just ending.

Intercut with the main story of the encounter with the strippers is more footage of "Sister's" interrogation, and footage of a poor double for Diane Lane lipsyncing and dancing to "Tonight is What it Means to Be Young" and "Nowhere Fast."

Oh, and we also learn at some point that he killed McCoy too because she didn't want him to wait for Ellen Aim's tour bus in the middle of nowhere forever.

The dialogue that "Cody" and "Sister" speak only resembles things they said in "Streets of Fire" when the lines are lifted directly from it, i.e. "I didn't want to carry her guitars."

It is interesting watching two actors reprise roles over 20 years later, but it is ruined by the fact that what they're given to work with is so hollow and pointless.

The entire thing was filmed in front of a green screen and I think they were trying to go for a "Sin City" like feel, but everything feels like it was shot in a garage and edited on a home computer. It honestly feels like a full motion video games from the early 90's such as "7th guest."

It does not look or feel like ANYTHING even vaguely resembling "Streets of Fire."

The entire thing feels like terrible fan fiction, except in fan fiction things actually happen.

This is not worth anyone's time. It's an insult to fans who crave a real follow up. But I realize no matter how much I warn against that, some people will still have to find out for themselves.


reply

I was there too. I came away shocked - everyone was pumped by Streets of Fire and I think Valkenburgh and Pare were embarrassed frankly by how they got involved with this awful, awful sequel. It destroys the characters of a great movie, rips off dialogue because obviously Pyun had no idea on how to write it within the SoF universe, and is so cheaply made it makes YouTube video's look like professional big-budget blockbusters.

Pyun explained the idea came from his wife thinking Cody was doomed at the end of SoF by leaving Ellen. Absolute tosh. The whole idea was what he claimed was his view - it was a romantic gesture as he knew he couldn't live in her world. Being that Hill had two sequels about Cody in mind that never got made, with him as central hero in both, the idea he somehow went off the rails and became a serial killer is just insulting to the character and the huge fanbase SoF has developed over the years. I had to go for a drink after this - the showing of SoF was a terrific experience, it's a wonderful film - now somewhat sullied by this disgraceful, terrible, amateurish piece of filth made by, evidently, idiots who never got the themes of SoF in the first place.

Streets of Fire will get spun on my dvd player several times a year, as always. I'll simply have to try and forget I ever soiled my eyes and ears with this disgraceful effort. Road to Hell? No. Piece of ***t, more like.

It's a tender love song, very beautiful. {Whats it called?} Lick my love pump.

reply

Thanks for letting us know,what happens!

It seems to be a bit confusing story!

Why does Cody kills Caitlin and what does he do with the boy?

reply

It's not that it's confusing, it's just so painfully boring. The only thing keeping me in my seat was the promise that it was "only about an hour long."

He kills Caitlin because he's crazy. My friends and I honestly couldn't remember what he does with the child. I think it leaves it open ended.

The fact that we all blocked out the ending should tell you enough.

reply

Ok,thanks for letting me know!

reply

If anyone cares, I also expanded upon what I wrote here previously and sent it in to aintitcool.com

They posted it here: http://aintitcool.com/node/38613

reply

If anyone cares, I expanded upon this snippet and sent it in to aintitcool.com since I had only previously heard of this project via them.

They posted the review here:
http://aintitcool.com/node/38613

reply

[deleted]