I have a bit of sympathy. Yes, Lars was something of a bag of dicks 10-12 years ago. But to be fair, music downloading was a brand new thing. NOBODY at the time could see the future or know how or if the music industry would or could change to rationally deal with it. The only comparable thing before it had been tape dubbing, but that was of limited equivalence since distribution of tapes couldn't really go all that far and since the sound quality of the dubs got progressively worse. By comparison, downloading was incredibly quick with great sound quality, and it meant that anybody could get pretty much anything, at any time, without paying. I'm not totally surprised the music industry overreacted.
It was good to hear him acknowledge the ways in which file sharing has benefited his band in particular, by exposing a few billion new potential fans to their music. Those few billion will spawn at least a few million real fans, many of whom will pay to attend Metallica's concerts and buy their t-shirts.
I say all this as somebody who has and still does download quite a bit of music for free. There are lots of BS ways for me to try to justify it, so I won't bother, except to say this: in so doing, I've become a fan of a number of bands that I probably wouldn't have otherwise. After all, I'm not likely to spend $12 at iTunes downloading an album from a band I've never heard, only to listen to it and decide it's crap. A number of the bands whose albums I've downloaded for free, I've since paid a lot of money to see in concert. The money they make from me buying show tickets is a lot more than they'd make if I'd never downloaded their music (potentially nothing) or if I'd bought a few of their albums.
reply
share