Is there gay stuff?

wrong and wrong

Wrong 1
I never said anyone is not attracted to anything RIGHT NOW just like straight people do, I said they do it, because they are an extreme version of an inclination that is present in everyone, and they had millions of years and billions of people to breed from. If you breed a specific trait from this kinda size of pool, you can get almost anything that is up to par with normal. But then again, this still doesn't make it normal. You could say special. Or "super normal" as some would say. Just like you wouldn't say beautiful people or genius ones are normal, even though we all have some talents in these areas. But just like in a culture of health and beauty most people will make sure they do look prettier and in a culture of philosophy and science most people do very much care about their intellect, in a prolonged situation of lack of other sex in a society, most people do start to tolerate the homosexuals of their own sex more as at least they are not competitors, but sooner or later as you take away increasingly bigger proportion of the other sex, a homosexual individual starts to seem as more and more viable replacement, but how much do the subject welcome this increasing interest that depends on the person in question.

Wrong 3
Healthy sexuality is about power, is about conquer, is about surrender and the best if these alternate from both part, regardless of how expressed they are, these elements are always part of it, even in the most squishy metro sexual sex, they can hide it, but they are still there or otherwise it is not sexuality, but rather tickling each other or like petting an animal or consoling a friend.

(also the part you quoted has nothing to do with gays, so this technically should be wrong 3)


@Agency757 "In most cultures, women don't shave."
Wrong. Only in 2 cultures: the primitive ones and the feminist ones, both of them has the earth mother type, but in the first one the men are manimals so they don't care, in the second men are pussies and too scared to say anything. (of course there are different cultures in different countries, but there are many "social tribes" in the same country as well, these 2 types are present there too, but luckily not just these 2)


"All you get from killing monkeys is a deep sense of shame." - Alec

BlackWolfJ31:

First:
You mean a 'gender science' journal? Those female entitlement nazis know as much about equality, as Darth Vader about the smell of the cooking food.
They ARE supremacists and they HAVE already achieved their brainwashing rhetoric in ages ago that you parrot.

Here is something for you to read so you will see just how far they went, if you want to see and understand the result of the devastating handiwork of ideological feminists and their demented white knights:
Nathanson, Paul; Young, Katherine R. (2001). Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture. Harper Paperbacks. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. ISBN 0-77353-099-7
Nathanson, Paul; Young, Katherine R. (2006). Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. ISBN 0-77352-862-8

You see the idea of feminism by definition is utterly deranged, because as long as anyone says they are feminist instead of HUMANIST, they totally discredit themselves in the eyes of everyone with any common sense and actual sense of equality.

Second:
I have never judged anyone's turn ons. If you say that you are lying.

Third, fourth etc:
I do not believe women would be inferior. I do believe that the lack of testosterone makes women to enjoy being submissive, because a strong man (ie one with lots of testosterone) is like an oven to their soft clay made heart, as it burns it to rigid porcelain which will be all too easy to break. THIS is NATURE and this is the insecurity that ideological feminists do not want to put up with, but also this is what they could achieve in the only case if they got testosterone in their system somehow (ie turn themselves into males) or make themselves ideologically and systematically hypnotized into the thought of being dominant could be satisfying as a lifestyle for women (reminiscent of uncontrolled, spoiled children, whom have as few actual biological basis for being bossy as them), whilst that as lifestyle can only ever bring bitterness, loneliness and a never filling hole in their soul to them (Just like it does to men. But men are not reliant on oxytocin as much as women, so mature men can put up with the downs of dominant lifestyle naturally, whilst the soothing presence of women is always a plus)
Now imagine the dominant woman and her male admirers, isn't always the beautiful (and/or cheap) woman who pulled this kind of trick off in the history? This should be a give away to understand we are talking about plain supply and demand and not some mystical female revolutionist who historically and miraculously broke the traditional 'gender roles' because of her own right.
The only way to make all women like this is to make them all beautiful, as this is (unfortunately) impossible, feminists think lowering men expectations will have the same effect just fine. That is the self reinforcing circle of pushing men down and hoping to get more attention to the mingers at the same time.
Welcome in our coming century, where unwashed hairy drunkard and fat women are the stars in the name of 'equality'.
Even still, women can be equal in life AND submissive in bed (or dominant if they wish), the problem is when someone like ideological feminists INDUSTRIALLY judge anyone for their turn ons, as surely they do when a woman dares to choose to be submissive in bed these days. Isn't THAT too about choice anymore or WHAT?
I enjoy my girl to be submissive in bed (I actually like to alternate our roles) and I wish I was daring enough to peacock in front of other men, because this is NORMAL! Our testosterone makes us do this, if someone had any that is! AND NOT TAUGHT GENDER ROLES!
Regardless of what your brain washer western media and rotten corrupt to the core academia taught you, the traditional HUMAN roles are always like that:
Someone who is dominant in life is normally submissive in bed, regardless of gender. A person who is submissive in life, normally wants power in bed, regardless of gender. If two (three, etc) people who complement each other in these, find each other, then they will be happy.
What ideological feminists want is power in life and power in bed, and all men should just disappear and shut up and pay all the bills after the kids.
And this is all too logical continuation of their justification of their self important existence, (in politics, science etc) as once you go towards equality and you achieved it, then the all too obvious route is to continue further to supremacy, otherwise why would they be needed anymore? They do not call themselves Guardians of Equality for a REASON.


"All you get from killing monkeys is a deep sense of shame." - Alec