Better ending (spoilers)
Here's what I thought was going to happen in the third episode, which I argue would be a better ending, befitting the themes in the earlier episodes of dodgy policing and so forth (while still keeping the eventual emotional ending the same):
We discover that George Bennett actually doctored the photos, before seeing Hawkin hanged.
This leads us to the belief that Hawkins did not actually commit the murder.
We then also find out that it was that policeman who suggested doctoring the photos to Bennett in the first place, but using the excuse of "He definitely did it, it's in my instincts, so make him pay however you can, even if there is technically no evidence."
When Sasha is left alone with the older policeman, he sort of makes a move on her, suggesting to the audience that it was actually HE that murdered and abused Alison. That is why he was so interested in trailing Bennett and ruthlessly framing Hawkin (to throw Bennett off the scent of catching him).
So basically we are left with a midpoint ciffhanger of thinking that the police not only hung the wrong man, but the real killer is about to strike again with Sasha.
That is until they uncover Alison's body (she really died in my version of events). With forensic study, they reveal that, actually, the police DID catch the right guy by accident.
Hawkin actually did abuse the children of the village, did kill Alison, did rape Catherine and was hanged. However, at the time it was not justified by evidence.
It turns out that the older policeman is not a paedophile himself and was just played a little sinister through most of the third episode (as a red herring). He's actually the nice guy he turned out to be. However, during the 60s, he inspired George to be a ruthless policeman (despite the lack of evidence) but now regrets this.
So it's still a morally ambiguous ending: the village knew he must have murdered Alison (despite not being in on it) but wanted to keep quiet to keep the village's reputation; the police knew he did it but had no evidence; the right man was hanged but at the time, due to the lack of evidence, he could have just as likely been the wrong man - still obviously a bad move in policing by today's standards.
What do you guys think?
AndySpark.com