Too much nudity.


This movie has far too much nudity. Too explicit.

reply

Seems impossible for a film to have too many pretty naked women and there is no explicitness in the film at all.

reply

[deleted]

I'm a gay guy and I didn't think it had too much nudity. It did serve a purpose, you know. As for the person who said that the non nude parts were boring, you're insane, it was the dialogue that made the film. There's a difference between porn and art.

reply

As a straight guy myself, I have to say the whole movie was interesting and well made. Not as good as the director's previous two, which complete a whole trilogy, but very very interesting. Kudos to Brisseau.

Javier H. Moreno
www.cacaorock.com

reply

[deleted]

i agree with You it is corrupted boring sick film
the fact that this is not a film at all no visual Allure from any kind except the nude porn scenes the rest is just a dialogue with no meaning boring monotone , no drama , nothing except some porn scenes
and with a final hidden message
" go run to satisfy Your sexual desires leave all behind job or family etc with no shame no respect to any one not family not religion no morals or faithful nor husband just leave them and run with the 1st stranger satisfy You briefly be self centered animal as far as You can "

reply

Any day above ground is a good day.



Did you watch the whole thing?

Why?

It is a movie about sex, brainless.

reply

That's hilarious. You watch a movie about a woman's sexual exploration in search of the perfect orgasm, and there is "too much nudity. Too explicit"? Puh-leeze. The movie is just unpretentious about nudity. That's about the only thing its unpretentious about, though.

reply