I just want to ask... did anybody realize that the ultimate bad guy (Rupert Everett) and his mate was just left in hospital where nothing happened to them after the car accident?
That is a bit of a strange way to finish the movie. It is not really tying up loose ends.
I was more annoyed by the whole Rose, Victor having a kid together thing! I thought it was juut bad writing for the last scene...only good thing was seeing Mr Grint in a suit!
T~O
HP~O
N.M.N #262
[b]Team Alice
I think the British in general are just bad with endings. They can tell a fair story, but can't figure out how to bring it to a satisfying close.
Think of the end of the UK "Queer as Folk", ending. The character Nathan (Charlie Hunnam) goes on to becomes 'king of the world' or something hokey like that. More likely he goes on to become a street hustler.
The same with the second season of SKINS, the last season for the first cast. Yes, it ended, and it was symbolic, but it was weak.
I think this was just typical of British 'anything'. They don't seem to do endings well.
Still, I liked the movie.
... and "3 years later" how did they have a little boy who looked as if he was about 3-4 years old? ... I still enjoyed this even though I had to suspend a lot of disbelief... mainly because it had some good lines and scenes...
Just because I'm easily distracted doesn't mean I