Poor Paw Paw


I choke up every time I think of that poor cat waiting to be picked up from the shelter. Paw Paw will haunt me for a long time.

reply

Yes it's sad. But in the end Paw Paw was more of a metaphor for the film's characters than anything else. But it's still hard for cat fans.

reply

PLeaqse spoil me as I will not be seeing this one after I have read your comments. Sounds like he ends up back at the shelter?

I do too much with discarded animals in my real life to probably be able to appreciate whatever this movie is trying to say I think.

Whenever you look up, there I shall be -- and whenever I look up there will be you.

reply

This explains what happens to Paw Paw:

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/movies/2011/08/the-future-paw-pa w.html

reply

I'm also heavily involved in animal rescue, so Paw Paw's story was really tough for me to take. The sad thing is it's the truth. It happens every day, dozens of stories like Paw Paw's each day, in shelters all over the country. While it's hopelessly sad, I hope it encourages people to adopt animals from shelters instead of buying from pet stores and breeders.

I do think you should see this movie. It sounds like you're familiar with the truth, so I doubt you'll see anything worse than what you know in real life. The movie is 100% accurate in that regard. I wish I had a dime for every hopeful animal who didn't get what he was promised.

reply

If Sophie and Jason only had the heart of Paw Paw! The cat was the most humane character in the film. Sophie and Jason are the Cheech & Chong of the You-Tube-Facebook generation, except it's not funny. They don't need drugs, they're just "naturally stoned" and bereft of any sense of purpose. They belong in a "Occupy Wall Street" protest. Of course, we don't know what animals feel or might understand, but the ONE thing these two useless idiots could have provided is a home for a sick cat. This was a very, very, very sad story. Sophie and Jason FAILED completely in their search for something that mattered. Ouch. This film was a commentary on much of contemporary culture.

reply

I couldn't agree more with AnotherCineFan. I did sit through this entire piece of dung - hoping there would be the big bang message that finally put this string of drivel into a cohesive story. It tries too hard to make a point, of which it doesn't know or understand. Very amateurish and poorly done. I will say Paw Paw was the only redeeming quality of this entire POS. And while I understood the attempted message with Paw Paw's demise, who couldn't see that coming a mile away? Do not waste your time. Rent Dogma instead.

reply

The entire point in this film is that hipsters are so self absorbed, they can't even take care of pets.

cause here things go from gray to gray and back to gray again

reply

jeez . . .kill me, this was too sad. now I hear his voice every time I see a cute little stray walking around.

reply


so very sad



When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

reply

Why sad? Dating is a numbers game, and it only takes meeting one man whom I feel a spark with and who feels the same to end the game. I don't have to waste time getting "to know" men under the guise of "friendship". I just have to meet *one* man. The right one and the search is over. That is not sad, that is being optimistic!

http://tinyurl.com/4skn5qe

reply

I've got to admit...the cat made me want to cry. Just the thought of the poor, sweet little thing waiting alone.

reply

Paw Paw was the only thing about the movie I loved. And in my mind

(SPOILERS)




His death just amplified their self absorption to the point that they were so completely unlikable, I hated the movie and I hated the characters except him.

reply


I had it the same way, Paw Paw was the only likeable character in my opinion.
I thought there was an neat idea somewhere in the film but the couple were so dull it was difficult to watch. The woman was the hardest one to get, I've met some weird people in my life but no one that can match this character's weirdness. I really couldn't stand her.

I liked some of the scenes when the guy is in that "limbo".


Don't tell me, it's no use to me. Tell yourself if you want to but don't tell me.

reply

(SPOILERS)



My partner and I are also deeply upset about poor Paw Paw. We were all ready to love this quirky movie narrated by such a sweet kitty but the heartlessness with which it was treated just kills us. People need to take more responsibility for what they create. Sure it matters whether this is truth or fiction but just because this is fiction doesn't mean that it doesn't matter. Oh how I wish I could unsee this movie. I recommend that you skip it.

reply

counting the seconds: "now, now, now, now" ...

reply

:( me too .. cried myself to sleep after watching the movie

reply

I felt horrible, too, guys! But at the end... Paw Paw is free, and better off than any one character in the entire movie. He tells us so himself, if you listen to the last scene before the credits.

He's not cat anymore, he's not waiting, he's not form or feeling, he just goes on and on and on and on

paw paw is forever

reply

[deleted]

I agree with bluesdoctor. I am an old man, keep a loving cat, and enjoy nearly all types of films. I enjoyed "Me & You...", and read Ms. July's book of short stories, "No One Belongs Here More Than You". I expected "The Future" to be more of the same: whimsical, funny, outrageous, inspired, and incontestably unique. And it was all these things, but more. To be honest, I didn't expect the outright pathos and pettiness of the relationship of the two main characters, or their pathetic search for something else or something more before it's too late. And I too got tripped up by the cat puppet, Paw Paw, who seemed to be the only human, humane, relatable creature in the film. I was indeed quite distressed by his "fate". But after reading so many of these IMDB entries, both pro and anti the use the cat was put to, I find myself concurring with the opinions of Paw Paw as metaphor for the film's characters (and by extension its viewers) waiting in vain for something to happen in the future, when "now" is the only time that anything can happen. The cat was a set-up: mother abandoned, born & raised in the wild, crippled leg, shut up in a cage for a month, then finally re-abandoned and euthanized. That a very obvious puppet with a creaky feminine voice could inspire so much emotion -- such anger and sadness and bitterness, not to mention renewed love for our own animals -- is surely a testament to Ms. July's talents as a writer and director. She said herself that many of her associates wanted her to take the cat out of the film, but she said no, that she considered Paw Paw to be the soul of the film. So whether you like it or whether you don't, the presence of this fictional cat greatly influences the individual's reaction to the film. I do not see this as crass manipulation; rather, I accept it as an invitation to see the world as she sometimes does, and as we all sometimes do, in all its thoughtless, casual cruelty. To me, "The Future" is a thoughtful, profound, quirky, and altogether wonderful film -- just not for every taste.

reply

[deleted]

Gawd, I'm still all choked up about poor Paw Paw and she's not even a real cat. Well I guess that I'm still mad about this truly horrible ending. And as much as I dislike most formulaic Hollywood endings, I vote that this be changed to one with a lesson for those young adults and an alive and happy Paw Paw.

reply

I could never sympathize with paw-paw. That voice creeped me the *beep* out, but I seem to be alone in this.

reply

yes candypants 42 - you are alone in that.

Whether pawpaw was meant to be a metaphor or real, it was a super sad character. I cried so much and so hard by the end of the movie & even months later, when I think about it, i still feel awful. a truly depressing film. I love Miranda July, but i really hope she comes up with something a bit more uplifting & positive for her next film!!!!!!!!

reply

I didn't cry, but metaphor or not, I was angry with the pathetic lack of responsibility of the two characters. Their forgetting about their duty to the cat made them NOT sympathetic characters in my eyes. I hated Miranda July's character for being such a dishrag wimp and loser, and allowing her self absorbed idiocy kill a cat. Metaphor or not.

You know, I like quirky, I like indie, I like unusual people with strange ideas. But this woman is just lame-ass. Annoying as hell.



reply

i was so mad they let the cat die. i finished the movie just for paw paw and i couldnt believe it, they forgot to get him.

UGHHH !

reply

I only watched this movie because it mentioned a cat in the description. Really sad when he never got to experience love.

"I've lost people before, so when I care about someone I plant a tracking device on them."

reply

I have a cat that puts up with me. Doesn't go out of it's way to say hello, but also wont shy away if I go to pet. Anyways, I used to have another cat who I was tight with, but he ran away to die somewhere.

Well, towards the end of this movie when, well.... you know. I started thinking of my 'homie' who ran away. Then the cat who puts up with me randomly crawls up in my bed (Which, literally never happens) and lays on my chest like the cat I was tight with used to.

It was pretty sweet. Plus it was a Miranda July flick so it was zen there for a second.

reply

I have no doubt RandomCat sensed your need. Climbing on the chest is a cat way of saying, "I love you." (Unless, of course they let the bum end face you rather than the whisker end. j/k!)

I know I'm late to this board, and it has been 3 years since your post -- but, how is RandomCat doing?



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"This man is dead, Jim." ~Bones

reply

Me too. I felt really bad for him, being killed because those two space cadet *beep* forgot to pick him up!

Schrodinger's cat walks into a bar, and / or doesn't.

reply