MovieChat Forums > Rage (2009) Discussion > Stephen King book?

Stephen King book?


Is this based on th Stephen King book? If so, I'd be shocked. It's the one book he said he regretted writing because many school shooters said they were inspired by it.

"I'm guessin' it's not the knee" Tony Almeida

reply

Probably not, unless King's book is "a bitterly funny exposé of the inner lives of individuals working at a New York fashion house".
www.imdb.com/title/tt1234550/board/thread/115784653

If you want to know what they're saying, turn on the subtitles

reply

Sally Potter said on her ow site that she got this idea aboug l0 yesra ago and it ha changed a lot fromk its beginnings and she was very excited about making
this film/ Having see a few of her other films I a excited to. She has a unique
and very interesting and worthwhile voice. I find the monent I have see one of her films I want to see it again to see what I might have missed. She is truly
a REnaissance woman of many, many talents and doesn't dissappoint.

Stephe KIng is on a comploetely different level and formulaec besides. Sallie's
ideas are always new and original.

reply

Stephen King books are not formulaic, the book that the OP is talking about is far from being formulaic, and I would love to see a movie of it, although it would never happen because school shooters gave it a bad name

reply

Yeah, this book was written at the beginning of his career as Richard Bachman, and the books that he had written at the time under that pseudonym were highly caustic and loathsome. This book predated the Columbine massacre by more than two decades, and this was the one of the four that wasn't individually rereleased around the turn of the century, out of respect for the victims of the tragedy. If this had been after September 11th, The Running Man wouldn't have been rereleased, either.
These are also considered some of his best paced works. Regardless, out of the four books, three end with the protagonist dying violently, while one merely ends with the main character being institutionalized. The Running Man and The Long Walk have protagonists that suffer unspeakably throughout the course of the story (both set in the future and leaning more toward science fiction), while Rage and Roadwork are set more at present times and have characters that merely suffer extreme mental anguish and respond with murder, sabotage, taking hostages, etc. These books rail against the system in a way that is not typical of King's work, and all four would make great movies, but don't hold your breath.

reply

Haha, I was wondering if it was the King book too. One day perhaps they'll finally make a film out of it...



"Nazis. I hate these guys."
-Indiana Jones

reply

I think The Long Walk would make an excellent, if hard to watch, film.

reply

Rage, by Stephen King, had very little to do with school shootings.
Yes, there was a shooting in it, and quite a pointless one, when you
come right down to it, but it was hardly the focus of the story.

To say that 'Rage' gives school shooters a bad name is kind of silly.
I'd say they give themselves a bad name, and their trying to say that
King's book inspired them is pretty weak.

Rage has violence, yes. One extremely pointless act of violence, and
a number of incidents, certainly. The main character is, after all,
in his own words, losing his mind.

The class full of hostages could be said to be suffering from Stockholm
Syndrome (or whatever it's called), but ultimately, the characters in
the story, with two exceptions, learn things about themselves, for better
or for worse, that are the stimulii for some life-affecting decisions.

Personally, I would have loved to see some kind of 'outside' sequel, to
follow the book, rather than just the clipped and edited letters hinting
at the things the class got out of that day, and presumably, the rest of
their lives.

The Bachman books were different from the King books, and Rage was, and is
my favourite of those I've read.

I think it would not translate well to film, though, because such character
driven movies rarely do well. Particularly when editing always seems to
remove the many sub-texts and there's just no way to see the thought process
of the protagonists in film.

reply

I'd agree. The book would not fit well into a movie, at least not a major release. If it was released as an extremely indie film, in the style of say Tape (Ethan Hawke, Uma Thurman, Robert Sean Leonard) I think it could be very effective. Yet it would probably only impact the indie world, but at least it would be something.

The main reason why this book is hailed as an "an inspiration" to school shooters is because several of them had read this book and a few had this book in their lockers when they were searched after the shootings. Yet if you look at the book To Kill A Mockingbird, many famous murderers had this book on them as well, yet it is still available for sale in any bookstore. I never understood the discrimination between the two, and I don't believe that there is.

As much as I loved Rage, I found The Long Walk to be King's best work, a pretty close match between that and The Eyes of The Dragon (which would also make a fantastic film). I have heard that Darabont has optioned the Long Walk (lets just hope he goes back to when he actually made decent films and we can forgive and forget The Mist) and I hope that he stays faithful to the book, any diversions of it will be a terrible mistake.

"She can't stand the sight of me. Now I see the funny side, now I'm always smiling!"

reply