Why would the 'face of Vegas' need to have a true beauty
Isn't Vegas known as 'sin city'. Why would Vegas care anything about true beauty.
I like the show and what it stands for, but Vegas was a bad choice for the location of the show.
[deleted]
MovieChat Forums > True Beauty (2009) Discussion > Why would the 'face of Vegas' need to ha...
yeah, that was pretty stupid...
I thought they did it because every good reality show has drama. Season 1 everyone was gorgeous, season 2 everyone was weird. Seriously, how did Astrology Boy get to the top ten of a beauty contest? He's got no inner OR outer beauty. And he's a charmless idiot.
You’re very eloquent when I’m drunk.
They didn't win "Face of Vegas," it was only a cover up. That's all.
As long as they're attractive on the outside and they find ways to reveal their true character, there's nothing wrong here.
"It's around 4 o'clock. We've been here since 12 o'clock. Five hours is like enough."
but thats not really fair, is it? a real "face of vegas" wouldnt be a "true beauty", they'd be raunchy, no-holds-barred, plastic titted, astrology loving, compulsive gambling addicts. no one in that competition was TRYING to win a beauty contest of any kind. Vegas is "Sin City" after all. they casted under this fake name surely KNOWING that the contestants would attempt to out-Vegas each other. In season 1, fine, they didnt tell them, but nothing about a beauty contest directly contradicts true beauty. miss sweetie pie and prince charming dont come to vegas, much less represent it. they casted under this name to find the freaks who would bring the most drama. they dont give a sh''''t about true beauty, they just wanted more viewers, and viewers come to drama like flies come to sh''''t. (see: Jersey Shore, any MTV reality show, Bachelor franchise)
You’re very eloquent when I’m drunk.