Telling the president to speed things up isn't necessarily a matter of control, but advice. And the President SHOULDN'T be "in charge". His is but one office in a system of checks and balances.
Capitalism....
- It doesn't occur in nature (because it's a theoretical concept and thus artificial)
Concepts are not really a strong point in nature which, as we've seen, humans are far more adept at than penguins. Humans create systems. Animals don't. Humans have a concept of time, future, etc. Animals don't.
- It can only take place under specific conditions that depend on complex rules being properly enforced.
As most systems are. And, as we've seen, enforcement is difficult to balance with freedom.
- Absent those specific rules or their enforcement, the stronger player will eat alive the weaker player.
The stronger player CAN eat alive the weaker player, but that doesn't necessarily mean they will. Self-governing and the concept of "enough" has a lot to do with it.
I donโt need you to tell me how good my coffee is.๎. ๎๎ฌ
.
reply
share
al666940-3
9 years ago
"Telling the president to speed things up isn't necessarily a matter of control, but advice."
And how many world leaders (or CEO's for that matter) "take advice" ON CAMERA? None who's really in charge. And you're clearly reaching if you're trying to spin a clear order (in front of an audience, cameras and microphone) into an "advice". I heard the guy saying it, and how he said it. Everyone did. Good luck getting us to believe your spin over our lying eyes and ears.
"And the President SHOULDN'T be "in charge"."
He IS in charge of the executive branch. Like he's in charge of the armed forces. If you think any general can just tell him "advice" like that in front of an audience, you're deluded (they all server at his pleasure, including his staff).
"Concepts are not really a strong point in nature"
An ant colony is also a concept (a well organized bunch of individuals performing specific tasks under specific rules), and 100% natural occurring. So you're insinuation is wrong.
"enforcement is difficult to balance with freedom."
Funny thing is, usually the people whom complain about that are the bullies whom are being restrained precisely to make things work for everybody, not just them.
"The stronger player CAN eat alive the weaker player, but that doesn't necessarily mean they will."
Self-governing individuals/companies/markets are about as real as the tooth fairy, Galt's Gulch and trickle down (supply side) economics. Show me a country with weak enforcement and I'll show you a failed state.
reply
share