a mistake I hope they avoid


One which tends to be a common mistake of movies, getting all the more common the last twenty years or so: Feeling like they need to go a certain running length. I've loved all these books since I was a child, and still do today, even though I'm not religious. I've enjoyed the films to varying degrees. But my main complaint, especially with the latter two, is that they just get to be overstuffed and too long. I think this is because they try to build it up so that they can have more of a climax. Makes sense, because in each of the books, it doesn't always feel as high-stakes as a movie might want to be. So they add. But really, if they can steer away from this, that complaint will be gone, so audiences may be happier, and it would allow time for more screenings. Wins all around. Back in the day, movies of this genre were fine being an hour and a half, now so many feel the need to hit 2 hours then some.

reply

I agree. I hope they stick to the book as much as possible, but really, I just want the movie to be made well.

Have you heard any news on production? I hope they didn't drop it completely...

reply

They announced a few days ago that Joe Johnston will direct, so hopefully things will pick up steam soon...

reply

I saw that post after I replied here.

Really hoping this turns out well.

reply

I have reservations, not sure he's the right director for this kind of project.

reply

The last two just weren't very good in general which does not give me high hopes for this one.

reply

Too long is only a problem for me if the movie isn't good. I am happy to rewatch the extended editions of the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

I liked the first two Narnia films; the last one, not so much. Still trying to figure out why Caspian lost his accent all of a sudden...

reply

THANK YOU! I thought I was the only one who noticed a difference. His whole appearance changed, too: hair and complexion were definitely lightly in Dawn Treader.

I'm also fine with long movies for the most part; I just don't like it if they add too much fluff. Like the Hobbit movies: not that I hated the movies, I just don't think they needed to add the whole thing with Tauriel or even Azog.

reply

It's tough to go through three movies without a single female character, so I can somewhat understand the addition of Tauriel. But the love story was very forced.

reply

*ahem* They had Galandriel.

But I can kinda see your point.

reply

Oops. Not sure how I could have forgotten Galadriel of Lothlorien while conversing with Leia of Lothlorien, especially seeing how she kicked some major butt in Battle of the Five Armies.

reply

Goodness yes, way too forced, very annoying.

reply

Same. LOTR any day. I enjoy Narnia, but they're fairly fluffy to begin with, so they should just be a bit shorter.

reply

The Narnia books are all quite short, which is a plus when adapting for the silver screen. The average novel is too long to adapt easily for the screen, things always have to be cut even with books that aren't as long as LOTR or Harry Potter.

The Narnia books are just the right length to make a good screenplay, and hopefully the terrible "Hobbit" movies have shown everyone what a bad idea it is to pad and draw out something that started out just right.

reply

Fair point. I don't hate long movies inherently, but I feel like B movies (which I would categorize Narnia as) are better shorter, and sometimes it seems like they think forcing a longer run time is all it takes to turn it into an A movie.

reply

Many sink down to the underworld and few return to the sunlit lands.

reply