Worst Movie Ever
I'm surprised we weren't asked to give a big heil to Bush & Cheney. This is the worst piece of war-mongering militaristic crap I've ever seen. I hope the producers burn in hell.
shareI didn't see it that way. I thought it raised excellent questions. I didn't see it give any credence to the Iraq War.
To me it really get's you thinking about if we should involve ourselves into world conflicts, do we just sit on the sidelines and let the world burn, or do we do something because we are so powerful that we can actually do something and it will be achieved. Or will the world burn at all if we scale back??? Anyone against war, and I'm going to assume you are, will hate this film because in the end it doesn't matter what the problems in the world are, you don't want war. I think that is real hard for some people to sit back knowing we can stop conflicts and atrocities. Just like the film says, Darfur, Rwanda, all the places where conflict is or was and we haven't involved ourselves, hundreds of thousands die, even millions in some cases.
So what do we do? Let the conflicts go on until they're over, if they ever get resolved, or go in and kick everyone's ass until they stop fighting? But then we need to have a military presence in some of those area's to keep the peace. Just like the film stated, we've been in Korea for 60 years and that military presence in South Korea keeps North Korea at bay.
Maybe we should go back to being an isolationist country. Just like the guy running for president, no one could ever storm our shores with our military might. But then will the world burn in the meantime? Or not burn???
They say the next great world war could be one of war over oil as the more of the world catches up and needs more power consumption. Endless what if's.