This movie is making history...


Weird how everyone rips off this flick saying how bad it is.
The irony is, is the more people check it out and vote giving it 1 outta 10 stars, the more popular the flick becomes on imdb.com
Check the rating. This week it went up a couple of thousand percent.
And that is totally the work and thanks to all those who say they actually hated the flick.
Personally, I think it wasn't the greatest action flick at all.
I do, however, think that it's kinda a good, simple story told in the best possible way considering their non-existent budget.
Considering the period it's supposed to play out in, the acting ain't that bad.

reply

One of the main reasons this movie is so bad is that it had nothing to do with a temple of the skulls, was so loosely based on the book to be embarrassing, and the acting was beyond bad (and I watch a lot of bad and cheesy films and my friends were all surprised to find that i thought the acting bad) (just because you have a poor budget doesn't mean you have to act bad). The fact that they called it the temple of the skulls (i rented it hoping for a new quatermain movie at last that wasn't either king slomon's mines or the city of gold) was a blatant rip off on indianna that wasn't even trying to be subtle. The only History this film is going to make is whether it surpasses Ed Wood's Plan Nine

reply

I like how the people who stick up for movies like this are easy to spot because they say "flick" a lot. Flicketty-flicketty-flick. Neato! Keen!

reply

It's a shame. It's like a high school project gone bad. This movie should be banned as a movie promoting awful taste in the film industry. I was laughing all the way through it. It's a shameful joke. Shame on whoever made it and had the guts to watch it afterwards without despising himself for the horror.

reply

go find yourself some stupid gay superhero movie with a 200 million dollar budget then

reply