MovieChat Forums > Secret of the Wings (2012) Discussion > If Lizzie can fly without wings...

If Lizzie can fly without wings...

posted 11 years ago by R-Mac
5 replies | jump to latest

seriously, the writers need to watch the first few movies again.

If Lizzie (the little girl in "The Great Fairy Rescue") can fly with a bunch of fairy dust sprinkled on her... doesn't it follow that they don't need wings to fly at all?

Oh, and I just remembered that in the original Tinkerbell movie - "Peter Pan" - all the kids fly with Peter Pan with the fairy dust.

Too many plot holes for my kids to enjoy it.

But they have to keep grinding them out, don't they?

[–] schea82 11 years ago

They are fairies, fairies have wings. It stands to more reason that because they have wings they wouldn't need the dust. I think, though, the dust is there to help them conduct their seasonal duties. They use the dust when flying to be able to fly farther distances and save energy, in my opinion. Humans need the dust because they don't have wings to be able to fly, of course. I don't see any plot holes here.

[–] Gypsy_Grace 11 years ago

If you remember in The Lost Treasure, Tinkerbelle loses her extra fairy dust and has to walk around on foot.

[–] Meushell 11 years ago

They need their wings to navigate. Otherwise they just float, and they need another fairy to guide. Pride prevents them from doing that.

Ok, I made that up. Lol.

-
Keevan - "I hate Ferengi." [THUNK]
Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

[–] Spongeyone 11 years ago

that was a plot hole in Fairy Rescue too. Remember all those wet fairies who couldn't fly.

But 4 year olds don't notice that.

Death to shakeycam directors!

[–] IMDB_Vits 10 years ago

Imagine loosing a part of your body. You can replace it with a prothesis. You can still perform the specific task but it'll affect you emotionally.