I'm very late for this but ....

Agree, but I would not say that Reagan had his reasons to do
what he did, and much of what Reagan did has been responsible
for bringing down the US, or at least the majority of the American
people.

Also, how does someone commit suicide by shooting themselves
twice in the head? How does that work?

Whether all the details were exactly as he was told by his sources or not, I wouldn't know. However he was obviously on the right track, and certainly didn't deserve to be treated that way.

"On April 17, 1986, the Reagan Administration released a three-page report acknowledging that there were some Contra-cocaine connections in 1984 and 1985, arguing that these connections occurred at a time when the rebels were "particularly hard pressed for financial support" because U.S. aid had been cut off."

"In the 623rd paragraph, the report described a cable from the CIA's Directorate of Operations dated October 22, 1982, describing a prospective meeting between Contra leaders in Costa Rica for "an exchange in [the United States] of narcotics for arms, which then are shipped to Nicaragua."[16][non-primary source needed] The two main Contra groups, US arms dealers, and a lieutenant of a drug ring which imported drugs from Latin America to the US west coast were set to attend the Costa Rica meeting. The lieutenant trafficker was also a Contra, and the CIA knew that there was an arms-for-drugs shuttle and did nothing to stop it."


"Testimony of the CIA Inspector General

Six weeks after the declassified and heavily censored report was made public, Inspector General Hitz testified before a House congressional committee.[15] Hitz stated that:
Volume II ... will be devoted to a detailed treatment of what was known to CIA regarding dozens of people and a number of companies connected in some fashion to the Contra program or the Contra movement that were the subject of any sort of drug trafficking allegations. Each is closely examined in terms of their relationship with CIA, the drug trafficking activity that was alleged, the actions CIA took in response to the allegations, and the extent of information concerning the allegations that was Shared with U.S. law enforcement and Congress. As I said earlier, we have found no evidence in the course of this lengthy investigation of any conspiracy by CIA or its employees to bring drugs into the United States. However, during the Contra era, CIA worked with a variety of people to support the Contra program. These included CIA assets, pilots who ferried supplies to the Contras, as well as Contra officials and others. Let me be frank about what we are finding. There are instances where CIA did not, in an expeditious or consistent fashion, cut off relationships with individuals supporting the Contra program who were alleged to have engaged in drug trafficking activity or take action to resolve the allegations.

Hitz also said that under an agreement in 1982 between Ronald Reagan's Attorney General William French Smith and the CIA, agency officers were not required to report allegations of drug trafficking involving non-employees, defined as paid and non-paid "assets"—pilots who ferried supplies to the contras, as well as contra officials and others.

This agreement, which had not previously been revealed, came at a time when there were allegations that the CIA was using drug dealers in its controversial covert operation to bring down the leftist Sandinista government in Nicaragua.Only after Congressional funds were restored in 1986 was the agreement modified to require the CIA to stop paying agents whom it believed were involved in the drug trade."

You go on and believe the "official" story like a good little sheep. I bet you believe the 911 commissions report and think the twin towers were knocked down by a couple of airplanes too. Time to wake up my friend. The government is in the business of lying and will do whatever it takes at any cost to keep their secrets quiet.

I've watched far too many Federal Investigations that my opinion is the outcome is already determined before the first witness is sworn in, and most of them are dog and pony shows. Not long ago I watched a documentary about what actually happened in Dallas when JFK was assassinated and it made so much sense it has to be the truth. It also explains why the pristine bullet dubbed the 'magical bullet' was found on the hospital stretcher, because it was put there to save the Sec Serv so much embarrassment. Seems that all the Sec Serv guys were hungover, including George Hickey riding in the car directly behind JFK's and when the first shot from Oswald went off, Hickey reached for his Ar-15 which he had never been trained to use, stumbled, and he accidentally fired it directly into JFk's skull. But since they had to account for 3 shots from Oswald the theory goes, "someone" just dropped a nearly pristine bullet onto the stretcher. "Oh gee whilikers, look, here's the 3rd bullet, fell outta somewhere and is just sitting on this empty stretcher". And the veteran Australian police detective who had spent four years investigating the assassination hypothesizes that everyone (in Government) wanted to save the Sec Serv's reputation, which is ironic because, well they failed. And it's said that 75% of the American public don't believe the Warren Commission which btw has placed a 75 year seal on some of the evidence. And in my opinion there's only one reason for that. You can read all about it at the Daily Mail, I find his evidence absolutely to be the actual facts.