The Rainbow Organisation = not a bad idea in my opinion

no *beep* i agree since i was a kid i was dreaming of becoming a rainboiw

The discussion here goes to what is considered a terrorist.

It may sound simple, a terrorist is someone who uses violence against civilian targets in order to achieve a political goal.

so the political factor is what diferences the terrorist from the common criminal.

Now, there are also groups of people who fights agaist a political regimes trough other means, from guerrilla to civil resistance, guerrillas are souposed to target only military-gubernamental objectives, but they are oftem called "terrorists", there are also political dissidents who make manifestations and or produce and distribute literature and propaganda against a political regime whithout the use of violence, but those are also called terrorists by the stablished regime.

There had been and still are stablished political regimes that keep thenselves by inducing fear on their countries population or use they military power to frighten other countries into "cooperation", oppresive military regimes, dictatorships and the like, they practice something called "state terrorism", what about them? Any national force who opposes such a regime would be called "terrorist" by the goverment, so wich side would this international task force take? will they support the dictator or would they support the dissidents?

And finally, there are countries that are not sided with the US, like north Korea, China, Vietnam or Cuba, and there are forces that perform actions of insurgence against these countries too, some with the support of the US, and The US controls the UN... so this international task force would really act in behalf of the world population or be a force to support US interests in the rest of the world eliminating all resistance?