MovieChat Forums > Rambo: Last Blood (2019) Discussion > This movie is NOT racist:

This movie is NOT racist:

posted 5 years ago by MovieChatUser497 (18943)
17 replies | jump to latest

Or “Trumpian MAGA” propaganda which is such a moronic phrase.

It’s just not very good which is a shame. Parts 2 and 3 are also not very good but they were at least awesome, I can’t say the same for Last Blood

[–] JoWilli (15157) 5 years ago

why would it be racist?

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

That’s what many critics are claiming , from their perspective a straight white male is murdering a bunch of innocent Mexicans

[–] tom8 (2888) 5 years ago

but rambo is navajo indian

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

But Stallone isn't.

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

FYI I am not the one saying this, I think it's beyond stupid to call this movie racist, I'm just telling you what some journalists and critics are saying (I think they are wrong).

[–] tom8 (2888) 5 years ago

of course.... but journalists and critics have lost all credibility.....

Look at the 2016 movie "passengers", many gave the movie bad reviews because they don't like the plot of the movie !!!

( A man taken a woman hostage / takes advantage of her, in their mind!)

completely ridiculous and outrageous, your job is to review the movie... not bash the story and plot!
that would take all movie directors and screenwriters free will away.
but that is of course also what the censoring left wing journalists and critics want.

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

which critics? citations please.
Otherwise it looks like you are trying to start the rumour rather than quash it, (even though you categorically state the opposite)

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/rambo-last-blood-racist-trump-critics/

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Linguists have been lamenting the degrading of the word "awesome"
having gone from
"The sight of of mt. Everest was awesome"
to
"yo , those fries were awesome"
to
Parts 2 and 3 are also not very good but they were at least awesome

wtf does that mean? that awesome ranks somewhere below "not very good"

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

They are bad movies but at least fun to watch

[–] janelsenor (2042) 5 years ago

No regular people are saying this.

[–] gcarras (2727) 5 years ago

I enjoyed it a lot!

[–] Burgershmurger (1268) 5 years ago

Who gives a toss about libtard sjw pseudo journalists! Mexico is indeed a shithole and human trafficking is real. Why is depicting reality racist?

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 5 years ago

Reality is offensive to them, they prefer to hide in their safe spaces.

[–] Strazdas (2328) 4 years ago

As Adam Savage has said: "I reject your reality and substitute my own"

[–] johnmiller (3357) 4 years ago

People had problems with this because it upsets their view of Latinos as perfect, angelic beings. Seeing even a small minority of them as the drug dealers, pimps, and thugs that there are doesn't fit the agenda.

[–] Strazdas (2328) 4 years ago

Funny thing: Latinos turn out to be more affected by SARS-CoV-2 because unlike blacks, they dont actually show up for testing.