blue screen?


I don't know what's going on? What does it mean it's only blue screen?

Is this movie being made or not? Also why only on DVD? Why no theater release?

reply

The movie is just a blue screen. There's no words or speaking, just a blue screen for 75 minutes.

reply

yeah and than if you look at the director he is doing others in other colors.

reply

I can watch The Catcher In The Rye on TV. Just change it to a channel I don't have and it will be blue. I can watch it for free without wasting 20 bucks.

I'm with the monkey that's using the force!

reply

no you can't. it hasn't been made into a movie you r-tard.

iz a bad vampire.
http://i26.tinypic.com/10zyg48.jpg

reply

[deleted]

haha, owned!

Sometimes it's a good day to die, and sometimes it's a good day to have breakfast.

reply

What is this! This guy must be laughing so hard at all the idiots who actually believe his films are "artistic" and "experimental". Are people so thick? Ughh this is exactly like the painters who put a dot on a canvas and sell it for five thousand dollars as "art".

And to be honest I always think of the colour red when I read The Catcher in the Rye. So he didn't even get that part right.

reply

I get it.

It's a neo-dadaist style against new trends in Hollywood and fashion. I wouldn't pay for a DVD that's just over an hour of blue screen, but I admire the idea of this and the other stuff he's done. Or maybe I'm the one being fooled. Maybe that's the point.

"In celluloid we trust." -Herzog

reply

its a great piece of work. i mean any other color wouldnt capture the essence of the catcher in the rye. red? nope. green? dont think so! pink? hell no! it's all about the BLUE

reply

You post about "Dollhouse" quite often, don't you?

reply

This has already been done before, Derek Jarman's Blue is the exact same concept.

reply

[deleted]

But you can but it for from only 350$ used 80)

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]