MovieChat Forums > Boogeyman 3 (2009) Discussion > A cast of unknowns pretty much sums up w...

A cast of unknowns pretty much sums up what we're in for!!!


An epic FAIL! The second installment was such a let-down. Why are they even BOTHERING with this? Quantity over quality, I guess. That's Hollywood for you!

"He made the girl next door bake him freaking COOKIES! That's how you know he's evil!"

reply

[deleted]

You're missing the point. Unknown actors = bad movie. Capisce?

"He made the girl next door bake him cookies. Freaking COOKIES! That's how you know he's evil!"

reply

I wouldn't call Kate Maberly an unknown.

reply

There is no one you can call Boogeyman 2 a letdown. It was better than the first one. It's everything a horror movie should be, not to mention great performances by Renee O'Connor and Tobin Bell.

You know the enemy of my enemy is often considered my friend.
- Joxer

reply

Euhhhh, no... Unknown actors doesn't equal bad movie.

I can name hundreds of good movies with unknown actors.

Besides, most horror movies have unknown actors.

and how was Boogeyman 2 a let down? It was a masterpiece compared to the original!

reply

Phantomdroid,

I'm confused! This is meant to be a Hollywood-made picture, and yet Nikki Sanderson, AKA Candice from Corrie, is in it. How come?



THERE ARE NO GALES, JUST SUNNY SPELLS....

Regards,
Gemini71.

reply

[deleted]

Chuck Hittinger is actually a pretty talented actor. so...... yeah.. just cause they aren't all known doesn't mean it will be bad.

http://i34.tinypic.com/281d7gz.jpg
"ever thine, ever mine, ever ours" - Beethoven

reply

I don't know who Chuck is, but Kate Maberly is amazing...

reply