Was the girl in the wrong for sleeping with Seth's roommate?

Hell yes she was wrong!!! What kind of girl accepts a date and then bangs your friend while your wating for the date day to arrive??? What a total B---h she was!!!

And to get mad at him casue he is pissed??? What a piece of garbage (not the actress - just the character!!) she was!!

The only good thing was that at least Seth's character was better off knowing what a skank she was before dating her!!

Yeah, I would say she was. The problem with a lot of people today (and I mean both men and women, not just women), is the loss of basic respect for one another. People get caught up in being "independant", but really that's just a way to be selfish while justifying it. If you say you're going to go on a date with someone, it's simply just respectful not to date/sleep with anyone else. And by not doing so it's not like you're commiting to that one person either. If it doesn't work out with them, then date someone else next week.

Hell yes she was wrong. He seems to have forgiven her quickly though...there was a lot of forgiveness in the movie.

"Being human in a world full of vampires is about as safe as barebackin' a five dollar whore."

[deleted]

Yes. She isn't too sharp.

Yes. It was a dumb subplot. They could have just wrote in the initial relationship, not this little melodrama. It made her look like a slutty fool and him like an even bigger fool for still wanting to date a groupie.

-
You did just fine, Clarence. Now go git yo'self some hot cornbread!

Was she wrong? Yes. If someone asks you out it certainly doesn't mean you're committed to them but I think it's reasonable to feel that sleeping with their roommate would be pretty lame.

Well, causal sex is really for those who are more animalistic and irresponsible/irrational/immature/amoral than those of us who are more developed and moral human beings, so there's that to begin with. (Don't get me wrong, sex is great--and I'm not a religious moron prude; I'm an atheist--but I firmly believe sex should take place within a meaningful relationship of some duration...I've refused offers for casual sex before from desirable partners; yes I am a young male lol).

And second, yes, of course. Even if you are immature/of lesser character (and amoral) enough to have no problem with casual sex, you still don't engage in it on the verge of a relationship with another. In terms of promises/trust, an impending relationship that you consented to (by accepting a date) imparts a burden on you to not betray your potential partner. You have implied a romantic interest in that person (and if you are just using him/her for entertainment purposes and have no interest in him/her as a person or potential partner, well, then you're below moral worth and dignity) and that should not be betrayed. If it doesn't work out, if you go on just one date with him/her and end it, it is one thing to engage in casual sex the next day after said ending of nascent relationship, but before a first date, and during the duration of the beginning of the relationship (even if it is to go nowhere) one should not betray the trust of a potential serious partner. I know that even if I was merely interested in a girl who I hadn't asked out yet I wouldn't have casual sex with another (if I believed in casual sex); that means that I'm not actually romantically interested in the other person.

Out before all the rationalizations and anecdotes from lesser mortals about how casual sex is a good thing that the best of us engage in and how promises/trust don't apply until one is well into a serious relationship or an agreement to be faithful to one another (go steady) is explicitly stated and agreed upon between the two partners. All less than reasonable tactics to justify less than moral and mature actions by those of us who are, well, less than moral/mature. (And no, I'm not a lawyer, but have studied philosophical ethics/value theory in some depth).