7.6? You gotta be kidding


This oddly coloured dirtyish rag of a flick doesn't deserve more than a 5.

my vote history:
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur13767631/ratings

reply

I don't know if I would score a 5, but 7.6 is indeed too high for this movie

reply

Just finished watching it and I'd give it a 2 because I'm feeling generous. A very dull and dumb movie. I watched it because I've been enjoying McConaughey in True Detective and previous to that Mud, but this Lifetime tv of a movie belongs in a trashcan.

reply

I think this run-of-the mill legal procedural is a 6/10 based on the performances, but I respect others' viewpoints – and the fact that most people gave it 7 or 8 (rather than 10 or 1) shows me that most folks are sincere in their votes.

reply

Incredibly contrived with viewer expected to go with the huge leaps in plausibility - average at best!

reply

Yea, I was pretty dissapointed too. The book was much better (obviously)

reply

I give you a 1 for lack of perception. This was a great film, 7.6 is spot on.

reply

You may give, I don't accept this one.

It's not a good flick by any means. It does feel quite odd but it doesn't help it. The actors also suck.

my vote history:
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur13767631/ratings

reply

Its a decently entertaining film with good performances all around.

Its that man again!!

reply

It was steadily heading towards a 7..until Roulet revealed he was indeed the killer...after that it spiralled down, down, down..

reply