Polar Bear Scene??!! (Spoilers)


Okay, I know there was bizarro behavior and continuity issues throughout, but someone walk me through this:
First, cop lets her go into zoo alone while handcuffed. Then, she suddenly is in the polar bear enclosure running without cuffs. Then, she is cuddling up to the bear.
Here is where I get (more) lost. When the camera shows the bear closeup, it is so obviously fake that I wonder if the bear in the movie IS fake. Perhaps that explains why she isn't mauled. The next thing we see is her back in cuffs sharing the back of the police car with some guy (maybe they picked him up at the zoo for impersonating a bear).
Then, of course, they just let her go from the police station. Did they just let her go, then why pick her up? Did she get processed and just let go (she certainly didn't post bail)? Just a weird ending that exemplified the whole film. I don't mind existential films and do not mind when they do not tie up into a bow at the end, but this was just indulgent surrealistic tripe.


-The breaking of joy is the beginning of wisdom.

reply

The bear in the movie is fake for two practical reasons: first, the whole picture was made for a tiny budget, and polar bears are expensive; and second, polar bears are vicious and deadly wild animals that don't take easily to training. The polar bear in "Lost" was also obviously fake; it's not a plot point, as near as I can tell.

My reading of that sequence also goes two ways. On the one hand, it's clearly her fantasy, a moment of communing with the bear; throughout the picture she lives more or less completely within her head (I don't believe that she's mentally ill any more than I believe that the Red Balloon is an alien device, or that Bruce Willis's John McClane is an indestructible superman; she's a movie character, and so she lives mostly in a realm of urge and symbolism), and I saw this scene as a point where the audience shares her internal life without chains, even though she is shackled in reality.

On the other, I also think it was part of a whole Eve-in-the-Garden motif, where her innocence is total because she is living in a state of grace, childlike, without any notion of sin. The splash into the river feels a bit like a baptism (this point was contributed by the actress in a discussion of the film), and her ease in cavorting with a beast that doesn't kill her felt very Eve-like to me.

It was clear to me that she was not ever actually in the bear cage.

As for being released by the police, well yes, of course. The police do not generally throw people in the dungeon for looking through a someone's bag and not taking anything. The worst the charge could be is along the lines of disturbing the peace or trespass, and she would have been issued a ticket or given a court date and released.

reply

Corporal-Tunnel is pretty much on the button as far as I'm concerned, and I saw the symbolism between having her handcuffed while watching a creature in a cage.

Regardless, I still think it was absolutely ridiculous to let her run around in the zoo with cuffs on without supervision; that wasn't believable. Even the nicest cop would've at least followed her in there after agreeing to her looking around, the movie cop had less common sense than a recruit or even an average, real person.

"Bulls**t MR.Han Man!!"--Jim Kelly in Enter the Dragon

reply

After the circumstances of her arrest, the cop was trying to pull the womans handbag off of her and still she wouldn't let go, "I'm just looking through it",
NO WAY would any normal thinking cops allow her out of the car, especially unattended, ridiculous.

The scene with the bear, ridiculous, the bear looked so fake they should've edited some of that out or cut it entirely, this is garbage, junk, crap, a waste of time.

reply