SRK was average as always, when I see him this film, I'm thinking of Dustin Hoffman as Rainman. The whey he speaks, the body language , how he walks etc.
I think Aamir Khan would be a better match for this role. He would put some things on the table that SRK have not. The story was alright, Kajol have done similar roles before but I think Aamir and Kajol would be a better match for this film! What do you guys think? ans please :)
amir khan would have ruined the film....
he doesnt know to play even a proper romantic role..
Amir alone ruined Fanaa..!
and this movie was great 4 me, (IMO)! SRK had loads of originality , like the playing with stones, and aspergers people do have some similarity so...hoffman and srk were somewhere similar
Amir khan would have done well, but SRK has done brilliant after this magnificent role i cant put Amir Khan on this pitch, sorry!
SRK was mindblowing in the film!
Chaka Kahn?
Madeline Kahn?
James Caan?
Didi Conn?
"You know me Marge, I like my beer cold, my TV loud, and my homosexuals fa-LAM-ing!"
what about Irrfan Khan?
share[deleted]
Dear Sahil, stop licking Aamir's arse.
shareDear Sahil, stop licking Aamir's arse.
shareyou got it backwards buddy any role aamir has done could be done by a ton of other actors better cause his films are story reliants (he can't pull of a movie with weak script) however most of the better srk movies are performance reliant and no one can pull them off (not all of them of course but this is one of the strongest ones)people need to differenciate between story and performance ,at his best aamir can't hold a candle(performance wise) to srk hrithik iirfan amitab...
share