Authenticity


I don't focus too much on the controversy surrounding the casting, because that will always be an issue for those of us indigenous people who exists in the US but are not represented causing everyone else to validate why using a non-indigenous person is acceptable.

However, my main concerns is for the quality of the movie. Obviously, like in any HOLLYWOOD movie (versus non-Hollywood) the protagonist always wins or, has to accomplish some amazing feat. Although I haven't seen the movie yet and am only aware of the reviews & the clips that are available, I was wondering how much should we rely on as far as authenticity goes? I know the story has been turned around making Sanford B. Dole look like a sympathetic, caring individual making him more "human", but watching the video clip of her speech, I have to question the accent.

Granted her father was a Scottsman, and the way our English is prior to Hawaiian Creole English was formed, why couldn't they at least hire an expert in these things? I'm sure someone is out there who could criticize the wardrobe too, or something else, but I'm interested in hearing those critiques.

reply


Aloha!

As far as the accent by Q'orianka Kilcher in the portion of the film set in England and afterwards - Princess Ka'iulani was 13 years old when she went to England in 1889 for her studies - she didn't come back to Hawai'i until almost 1898 and newspapers of the time describe her as : "entirely English" because of her time spent in England and the fact that the majority of her education was received there".

It is indeed true that she had a pronounced English accent upon her return to Hawai'i.

reply

Made sense to me as well. The actress had a neutral-sounding American accent early on, then after living and being educated in England, she spoke with more of a British accent. I noticed the change, and thought it a nice touch.

The war is not meant to be won... it is meant to be continuous.

reply