War of the worlds 3 : H G Wells turns in his grave
I understand that with new advances in cinematic technology it becomes possible to "revisit" certain stories and give them a cinematic 'make over' and for the most part this is a good thing, however writing up sequels for stories that had no sequels is lame in the extreme, (Sort of like the New adventures of <Place name of classic character here>)"Milk that cash cow!!!".
A common complaint of "book to movie" is how much the movie differs from the original story line, in many cases losing the very message that the book set out to put across, some puritans insist that each and every character in a book should be represented on screen, some extreme puritans insist that the film strictly follow the book I am not one of these puritans, a movie can be made from a book really well and still encapsulate the main theme of the original storyline, I am even forgiving of "Modernising" a storyline to make it more recognisable to a modern audience (Most plotlines require some sympathy for the characters and modernisation allows a modern audience to sympathise with contemporary characters), but a sequel to a sequelless storyline is just pure profiteering for the sake of the almighty dollar.
I suspect that this "Sequel" will be a shallow and empty shell of a story that many of us grew up with in both book and movie format (I read the book long before I saw any movie of the story) that will not only lose sight of the original message of the story but also be manipulated in some stupid way (Like the War of the worlds TV series).
Why does Hollywood, who feel the need to flex their copyright legal muscles all over the world, think it is OK to screw around with copyrighted classic stories with cheap and nasty sequels where there was never supposed to be a sequel?
What next "Pride and Prejudice 2 : Mr Darcy goes psychotic with a chaingun and rocket launcher"?
Some stories just don't have and were never meant to have sequels and The War of the Worlds is one of them...