MovieChat Forums > Bachna Ae Haseeno (2008) Discussion > 1996? 2002??

1996? 2002??

posted 16 years ago by fbayat
3 replies | jump to latest

So I saw this movie and it totally made no sense! Like when they are in Switzerland in 1996 they looked like they were time travellers from 2008. Like helloooooo, different clothing?? At least?? Not to talk about the hair+make-up etc. Ditto for 2002. I mean come on, they coudn't think of that?

Apart from that it was a goot time pass. Worth a watch. Not that original. Like some people said on this board Definitely Maybe and Alfie mixed up in a Bollywood movie.

Yuck and i hate bipasha. Sorry for all the fans out there. But she just can't act and she's like totally full of herself. Whatever. Ranbir was ok and i liked deepika since she made her debut in Om Shanti Om.

[–] lastlooklove 16 years ago

What are you talking about? I thought Bipasha acted very well! In fact I found her the best in the movie. Ranbir was great too. Deepika didn't have much of a role, but she was good nonetheless.

I agree with everything else that you said regarding the timeline.

[–] rohonnag 16 years ago

i really bad director does this to people, you think it all happens in a few months time

rather than 11 years

hum tum did a better job at it altogether

Why...So..Serious? Let's put a smile on that face of yours!

[–] Sahil_Madan 15 years ago

Hum tum was just good because of Saif Ali Khan's acting. Bachna ae hasseeno was to much and what happend to the indian culture? And the kissing scenes was unnecessary and had no class. Just cheap, but loved the Khuda Jane video :) Not SRK jumping around playing superstar coping south indian flicks!