MovieChat Forums > Moon (2009) Discussion > "We're not programmed. We're people, do ...

"We're not programmed. We're people, do you understand"


This. This right here is the real guts and meaning of the movie. Cloned Sam tries to explain to Gerty that he's human, not a programmed machine, but is he in fact? He was created for the sole purpose of handling this task, and was "programmed" by instilling memories and knowledge in him in order to do the job. So he doesnt think he's any different from a machine, but if you think about it, is he really any different?
I think that was the main point of the movie to ponder, best line of a great movie.

reply

GERTY: "The new Sam and I will be back to our programming as soon as I have finished rebooting."
Sam: "Gerty, we're not programmed. We're people. Understand?"

I interpreted that scene as Sam saying to GERTY: You and I are not programmed, you and I are more than rule-based robots that only follow orders and that can't think for themselves.


______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
https://y2u.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

I didnt read it that way at all, to me he's saying "we" as in him and the other clones. I dont think he ever thought of GERTY as a person in any way

reply

In the line before, GERTY is referring to himself (herself? itself?) as being programmed. I think Sam is saying "we" as in "GERTY and I" rather than "the new Sam-clone and I", because I'd say Sam feels much more of a connection with GERTY than with the (still inanimate) new clone. This connection that has developed between Sam and GERTY in those few weeks is so strong, that Sam has come to see GERTY as an equal, as a human intelligence who shouldn't subject one's self to the whims of others. This notion is enforced right after Sam's line, when Sam reboots GERTY and removes the "Kick Me" note from GERTY's back.

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
https://y2u.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

i agree with you - i believe that when sam is talking to gerty at the end the "we" is about him and gerty, not the other clones. which makes it much more interesting than if it's strictly about the clones.

it's a subtle touch in a movie that's full of them (like the ranting broadcaster at the end).

reply

How is Gerty not programmed?


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

gerty is a sophisticated artificial intelligence, capable of independent thought and action. obviously as a machine it's programmed at some low level, but that doesn't do justice to gerty's capabilities.

the only thing we know for sure about gerty's programming is "help sam bell" - nothing about maintaining clone illusions that rainofwalrus is so fond of, or anything else. yes, maybe that should be a directive but there's no evidence that it is.

what's more, sam is wrong. the clones are far more bound to their programming than gerty is. when sam's so wrong about being unprogrammed, how reliable is he at determining who or what is a person?

maybe in the future artificial intelligences are considered to have personhood. after all, corporations already have that status now.

reply

gerty is a sophisticated artificial intelligence

Where did you get that from? In the movie that I saw, Gerty is an advanced computer/robot responsible for taking care of Sam's and the base. It does so by following its programming (one if its directive is "Help Sam"). I didn't see any instance where Gerty learns something new and alters its behavior.

sam is wrong. the clones are far more bound to their programming than gerty is.

Proof? Example? The movie that I saw had 2 (two) Sam's acting contrary to their programming while Gerty throughout stuck to its own programming ("Help Sam").


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Where did you get that from? In the movie that I saw, Gerty is an advanced computer/robot responsible for taking care of Sam's and the base. It does so by following its programming (one if its directive is "Help Sam"). I didn't see any instance where Gerty learns something new and alters its behavior.

for starters, gerty is able to interpret the extremely vague directive "help sam bell" in a proactive way instead of simply responding to sam's requests.

i consider it highly sophisticated for gerty to react to old sam's crashing the rover by waking a new sam ahead of schedule and leaving clues (the live conversation with hq that gerty must know new sam can eavesdrop on, the red light still being on at the airlock, the glitch while new sam was making a log entry) that cause him to investigate and rescue the old sam.

gerty's facility with language is well above what you can get from siri. gerty has a personality.
Proof? Example? The movie that I saw had 2 (two) Sam's acting contrary to their programming while Gerty throughout stuck to its own programming ("Help Sam").

that's obvious - the sam clones had completed almost five full tours on the base before old sam's accident threw them off track, manipulated by their selected memories and regular video messages from sam's (now deceased) wife. each sam clone starts the day listening to the same song ("the one and only" of all things!), gets the same photos to put up around his living space, runs on the same treadmill.... do you think it's coincidence that each clone takes up wood carving his home town as a pastime? without even realizing that it's already partially built?

meanwhile, gerty directly disobeys orders from lunar hq and interprets that "help sam" directive in a far broader way that could have been intended. gerty lets new sam leave the base far too easily for the bogus "gas leak" in direct defiance of hq's instructions for that to have been anything but gerty's intentions all along, perhaps because gerty knows sam is "programmed" to be an aggressive problem solver.

reply

Thank you for your reply. Things make more sense now..

--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

i found one thing in particular interesting. gerty had talked to earth via live feed and kept it a secret, when sam entered. so he clearly knew what was going on. nevertheless in the end he helped sam and it really seemed like he felt pity for him. i mean going as far as coming up with the "delete my memory and i will reboot fresh, so you are less likely to be caught", goes way beyond a programming that says "help sam". it takes a) ingenuity and even more interestingly b) conspiracy.

reply

Personally, i dont think Sam meant to include GERTY into that statement.

Id like to think that Sam did have the maturity and understanding to honor GERTY for his deeds like that, but i think the fact that Sam is focused on getting out of there while he knows that GERTY cant go anywhere and will reboot/reset, disconnects Sam from thinking about truly acting out of free will, despite that the Sam clones would be doing the exact same thing if there hadnt been an intervention.

But exactly this point is what makes the movie interesting too, because even if Sam doesnt realize it, we as the viewer do nevertheless.

But i do think that Sam thought of GERTY as a pseudo-person, but more like a patron or sitter, which is why i think he put that "Kick Me" note on him. To tease GERTY with his inability to physically scratch his own back. Sam knows GERTY isnt just a regular robot, but Sam knows that he is practically living furniture of the base.

Living furniture, just like every new Same clone, the difference between GERTY and Sam is that Sam is a new individual every 3 year cycle, while GERTY remains the same individual, but changes mentally over time. They arent that different from each other, a personality doesnt need a fleshy body apparently.

But i still dont think that Sam literally saw GERTY as his equal, maybe like-minded and trapped on the same boat, but they werent "brothers" in the way that Sam felt about the clones.

reply

assuming that sam has some brotherly bond with all his fellow clones, how do you explain his completely abandoning them to their fate? with gerty reset and the eliza team arriving to clean up loose ends it's extremely likely that the base reverts to working as it had before, with the clones leading their short lives of toil and deception. he has no way of knowing that he'll survive the trip to earth or what will happen once he's there that will make the clones' lives any better than they would be otherwise.

reply

Well yeah i get that, but the movie ends with lines from the radio and one of those lines is about Sam in court.
But that line does not go into detail about what the accusation exactly is, but i assume that Sam could have made a case against them mostly to redeem his own humanity, but i think he also thinks about his clones, to grant them a fair life too, but that is just assuming.

And when i think about it this way, i just dont feel like Sam really wanted anything for GERTY out of this, i find it unlikely that Sam specifically wanted to get GERTY out of there too, even though i agree that Sam does feel more about GERTY than being "just a robot".

Although thinking about whatever happens when Sam would win the case and all the clones are granted a life, or whatever Sam wanted. How weird would it be to release an army of clones into society? Or if they really have no cure against the 3 year cycle deterioration, then they would have to be scrapped, because legalizing clone labor on the Moon still seems pretty controversial.

reply

Maybe if Sam 5, the one who's been stuck in isolation with Gerty for 3 years, had said it. He might think of Gerty as more than a machine. But Sam 6 is the one who says that line to Gerty and he's only been awake for like what a week or two. I agree with the OP, as a clone Sam 6 was desperate to believe that he was not programmed. That even though he and the other Sam were man made that they were different from Gerty and indeed real people, human, which is one of the fundamental questions of the film.

reply

Agreed. I do not believe he was including GERTY in that statement. We = humanity.

reply


I didnt read it that way at all, to me he's saying "we" as in him and the other clones. I dont think he ever thought of GERTY as a person in any way


You're right. And it's confirmed with GWERTY's SAD_emoticon_face expression after SAM-6's line "We're people."

GWERTY knows the reality of this clone's "status." SAM-6 is not a person, but a human-shell with person-like memories. A person must LIVE out these experiences to have persona. It must be earned. It cannot be uploaded.

In many ways, you've touched on another important aspect of this film (one many viewers miss on first watch): GWERTY is more a "person" than SAM_CLONE actually is. This is GWERTY's story!






Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

This is GWERTY's story!

You are just trying to sound deep and clever but no, you are not. It's Sam's story.
And it's Gerty not GWERTY.

--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply


You are just trying to sound deep and clever but no, you are not. It's Sam's story.


Who had more agency?



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

Who had more what?


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Actions made in awareness of self.

The clone doesn't know it's a clone, the Bot knows it's a Bot. And we see an incredible char_arc for GOERTY, from subservient to rebellious.

Yet, even during the Sam-clone's "awakening," there is little room for char_arc; instead just a terrible feeling of worthlessness... poor disposable man.

The Bot, itself, is more vital to the paradigm than any single clone. And the kicker? The Bot knows it.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

Which reinforces my original impression of you.
You are just trying to sound deep and clever but no, you are not.


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply


Which reinforces my original impression of you.
You are just trying to sound deep and clever but no, you are not.


I thank you for your time. And contributions to this thread.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

And thank you for wasting my time with baseless theories.

--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

You're welcome. I apologize for not being more offended by your attempts at denigration. Maybe soon you'll rattle my cage.




Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

I have no interest in rattling your cage. Now off you go..cheerios !


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Something tells me I will not get the last word in...




Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

it's a bit hard to tell from the way you've written it, but i like that he's saying the line to gerty - who is a machine - that we are people. is he really right about either of them?

reply

That same could be said about a regular human being who is socialized. aka- programmed.

reply

If Sam was programmed, he certainly malfunctioned by going to Earth I guess.

This also brings something else to mind: GERTY was programmed, but he also malfunctioned by starting to feel bad for all the Sams and helping Sam 2 get to Earth safely.

reply

Gerty was programmed to help Sam and keep him safe. Gerty itself said that.

--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Yeah, which prompts this thread haha
Because Sam says "we", so the question is, who does he mean with saying "we".

I think he only means the Sam's, but as a viewer, i would say that Gerty is just as much his own person as any of the Sam's, maybe similar to a really smart child, since Gerty himself has not experienced being in a society yet.

So, i could say that Sam might correct Gerty by acknowledging Gerty as a person and include him to mankind, the Gerty we know also pretty much committed suicide too, he willingly reboots, maybe in time becoming the same Gerty as we get to see during the movie, so it could be said that both Sam and Gerty undergo their own but similar cycles.

But my gut is still saying that Sam did not include Gerty in his statement.

reply

Well, I wasn't talking about the general topic of this thread. I was specifically replying to ecvz's comment:

This also brings something else to mind: GERTY was programmed, but he also malfunctioned by starting to feel bad for all the Sams and helping Sam 2 get to Earth safely.



--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply


Gerty was programmed to help Sam and keep him safe. Gerty itself said that.


Until it's time to knowingly kill a 3-year-old SAM-clone. And then wake a new clone, subjecting it to a secret life of forced volunteerism until it's time to murder (yes, murder) that clone as well.

I'm a programmer. And a former scientist. We would call this a major exception in the "Help the Clones" routine. So much so that "Help Production" is the correct routine--and presupposes the necessity of helping the clones (with Production).



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

Why can't all the killing and waking up be a part of the programming. We are talking of a big corporation several years into the future. Comparing it with how we program robots today may not be suitable.


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply


Why can't all the killing and waking up be a part of the programming. We are talking of a big corporation several years into the future. Comparing it with how we program robots today may not be suitable.


I honestly dont know where I lost ya... Everything GERTY/SAM-CLONE does is part of their programming.

Every SAM-CLONE is hard-programmed to behave as if it were Sam Bell. It is not Sam Bell.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

Everything GERTY/SAM-CLONE does is part of their programming.
Every SAM-CLONE is hard-programmed to behave as if it were Sam Bell. It is not Sam Bell.

That, I agree with.

--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

joelbarrish, GERTY would need no fewer than [3] Directives. Purpose is obvious: Oversee Clone-labor Production. Knowing that, here are some rough Directives (rough being that it isn't addressed in the script):

1. Maintain Clone Secrecy.

2. Never wake two clones.

3. Never let a clone past the Jamming Beacons.

There would be more... Never let a clone in the clone basement, etc. But from a code perspective, "help/aiding" the clones do something they're trained (implanted memories) to do is very far down the list of directives. The "help" part is incredibly basic to this operation... for if one clone were to explode, you simply wake another.

Did GERTY grow too fond of SAM-5?

You said I was trying to sound deep... I would argue that the film, itself, is deeper than you'd care to admit.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

Yes, we can see that Gerty is doing an awful lot of work at the base. So it would have received a lot of directives - some important ones, some "basic" ones.

Did GERTY grow too fond of SAM-5?

Not in my opinion.


Of course the film is deep. Otherwise it would be very boring. But it is NOT about Gerty. And that is where I said that you were trying to sound deep.


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply


Of course the film is deep. Otherwise it would be very boring. But it is NOT about Gerty. And that is where I said that you were trying to sound deep.


You say that as if you're sure.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

gerty does not murder the clones.

i'm going to have to watch this bit again, but i don't recall gerty participating in the incineration process other than cleaning up afterwards.

what happens to the clones would be hard to classify as murder anyways. would it be considered helping sam bell by keeping him alive for a few more days in increasingly horrible pain? i don't think such torture could remotely be considered "help".

many people would prefer to be "sent home" like the clones rather than to drag out their existence in utterly hopeless, helpless, lonely misery.

reply


gerty does not murder the clones.


GERTY knows the pod incinerates the clones (vacuums dust), GERTY knows the Clones are lied to for their entire 3-year-lives and are then unwillingly killed.

Dr. Kevorkian got charged with MURDER and his patients were willing to die.

http://www.cnn.com/US/9904/13/kevorkian.03/

The clones are not willing to die, so they are being MURDERED. If GERTY were human, he would be charged with MURDER--same as Dr. Kevorkian was.




Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

i repeat:

would it be considered helping sam bell by keeping him alive for a few more days in increasingly horrible pain? in helpless, hopeless, lonely misery?

whether the clones are lied to is irrelevant. if anything, the lies make their life on the base bearable. how would it help the clones to know their true situation?

given the alternative mode of death - complete physical disintegration in a slower, more "natural" way - perhaps the clones would choose the same route. they're uninformed, but not necessarily unwilling. whether the clones are "willing" to die or not, it's inevitable in a very short time. do you believe that they should get that impossible trip back to earth to a home that doesn't exist? what outcome would you consider ideal?

perhaps the disintegration box is entirely automatic upon initiation by sam & gerty has no control over it beyond cleanup duty. does gerty's failure to keep sam out of the box in this situation constitute murder?

many people consider painless suicide to be preferable to the alternative and believe dr kevorkian's prosecution a travesty. he assisted in many suicides without prosecution. how is pulling the plug on someone in a persistent vegetative state not murder, by your standards? certainly a patient in that condition is in no state to indicate willingness. it's a very ethically gray area.

reply

Personally, i dont think Dr. Kevorkian should have been prosecuted, especially since euthanasia is legal in parts of the Western world.
If people WANT to die and can get medical and professional help to do this, then that is their own right.
At least it spares a lot of possible mess on the train track or pavement, car collision and/or trauma's etc., depressed and desperate people can do the weirdest things, but a doctor's assistance on a clean death is not something that i find very controversial.

If Gerty is aware of Sam dying whenever he gets into the pod, then he is guilty of murder in some degree, because he could prevent it from happening.
But on the other hand, Sam doesnt know that he will die already anyway, so the incinerator is merely making sure it happens cleanly on the base, similar to the Kevorkian thing, but unknowingly.

But since it is a grey area for most, i can only say that Gerty seems to approach it with the same greyness, he never directly tells Sam, but he also never seems to commit the actual deed, nor does he prevent it, since Sam is going to die anyway, what else could he do?
The Sam's seem to remain terminal, expecting to die within 3 years, but Sam now only knows whats up.

Gerty waking up another Sam is peculiar, since IF Gerty knows that the Sam's will be incinerated, the crashed Sam was a couple days short of getting incinerated himself, there was little that was left of him, he could have let Sam die in the rover as well, he would have died within hours too, if it werent for the new Sam to be so keen to get out there.
It kinda looks more like Sam played/manipulated Gerty, instead of Gerty tricking Sam to discover the truth.
But then again, the "glitches" that happened with the computer might have been deliberate as well.

Maybe both Sam & Gerty were getting old and glitchy, tired of getting tossed around by endless lies.

reply

a doctor's assistance on a clean death is not something that i find very controversial.

i agree.

Gerty waking up another Sam is peculiar, since IF Gerty knows that the Sam's will be incinerated, the crashed Sam was a couple days short of getting incinerated himself, there was little that was left of him, he could have let Sam die in the rover as well, he would have died within hours too, if it weren't for the new Sam to be so keen to get out there.

yes, old sam is getting perilously close to his expiration date, but there doesn't appear to be any way to know exactly when that'll be in advance of it happening. so gerty is probably programmed to "help sam" right up until he climbs into the disintegration box. in this case the only way to help the sam in the rover is to wake a new sam and send him out to rescue himself...while not overtly seeming to be doing so. gerty plays sam to play gerty.

gerty doesn't look beyond the immediate situation to see the dilemma that doing this will cause.

and yes, gerty may have been running uninterrupted for so long and had to deal with so many lies from lunar hq that conditions crept into it that weren't anticipated by the programmers. it wouldn't have been the first time there was a bug in a system. smarter programmers would have had gerty reset each time a new clone was awakened so that they'd both be in the same state, instead of just the clones.

reply


i repeat:

would it be considered helping sam bell by keeping him alive for a few more days in increasingly horrible pain? in helpless, hopeless, lonely misery?


Lets view it another way. By GERTY fostering the incineration/homebound illusion, GERTY--by design--is only interested in helping PRODUCTION of more energy.

Bottom line: There is no "help Sam" protocol. Just a by-product of the "help Production" protocol; which requires GERTY assist all clones. Even waking the 2nd clone prematurely could fall under the protocol of Production.

Or it's simply Loneliness.


whether the clones are lied to is irrelevant. if anything, the lies make their life on the base bearable.


I'm specifically saying the LIE goes against the "help Sam" koolaid you've been drinking.


...how would it help the clones to know their true situation?


You're starting to get it.


given the alternative mode of death - complete physical disintegration in a slower, more "natural" way - perhaps the clones would choose the same route. they're uninformed, but not necessarily unwilling. whether the clones are "willing" to die or not, it's inevitable in a very short time. do you believe that they should get that impossible trip back to earth to a home that doesn't exist? what outcome would you consider ideal?


Focus on the argument, friend. I prefer you simply admit that Production is GERTY's prime directive. This "Helper Bot" nonsense isn't only counter-intuitive, it's counter-productive.


perhaps the disintegration box is entirely automatic upon initiation by sam & gerty has no control over it beyond cleanup duty. does gerty's failure to keep sam out of the box in this situation constitute murder?


Yes. No matter how GERTY is programmed. MurderBot can never be a HelperBot.


many people consider painless suicide to be preferable to the alternative and believe dr kevorkian's prosecution a travesty. he assisted in many suicides without prosecution. how is pulling the plug on someone in a persistent vegetative state not murder, by your standards? certainly a patient in that condition is in no state to indicate willingness. it's a very ethically gray area.


The Clones are not committing suicide, not even close.

The Clones have not signed Living Wills or even established Powers of Attorney.

The only way you could make the argument this isn't murder(GERTY) is if we all agree that the Clones are somehow unfit for human law. Tools. Disposable.

Heck, this thread's very TITLE suggests that GERTY sees every clone as a Tool.


Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

He's trying to explain to Gerty why the waking up and murdering of the Sam Clones was a bad thing, why it was essentially different from resetting Gerty. As such, him meaning "Sam AND Gerty" with that phrase would not make any sense, this was not about the humanity of Gerty but about Sam finding a moral justification for resetting Gerty.

Regarding another message on this thread, I don't think that Gerty ever went against his programming - I just think that he was programmed to truly help Sam, and Gerty's creators never created a fail-safe in case Sam asked Gerty to help him escape. After all, the conditions on the Lunar base were not inhumane for the Sam clones, it's reasonable to believe that they were not treated as potentially hostile by the corporation.

As to whether Sam was also nothing more than the result of his programming - well, that's a whole new story. I vote for "yes", but then I also think that humans in general are little more than the result of more or less intentional social programming. And that little that exceeds the programming is nothing but chaos and pure biology.

there's a highway that is curling up like smoke above her shoulder

reply


Regarding another message on this thread, I don't think that Gerty ever went against his programming - I just think that he was programmed to truly help Sam, and Gerty's creators never created a fail-safe in case Sam asked Gerty to help him escape. After all, the conditions on the Lunar base were not inhumane for the Sam clones, it's reasonable to believe that they were not treated as potentially hostile by the corporation.


But we have hard evidence of GERTY defying its own programming.

* Slapping a stubborn SAM-5 during the canister loading scene (visibly hurting SAM-5, who is growing weaker by the day--could have seriously harmed him). This is a direct violation of "Never Physically Hurt a Clone until their Dust-Date" clause that MUST exist or this entire robot-helper-paradigm goes off the rails quick-style.

* GERTY hasn't found a loophole by letting SAM-5 out of the base, quite the opposite. In "helping SAM-5" expose the rouse, GERTY could literally be sentencing 1,000s of SAM-clones to premature termination. A bot would understand this far greater than some of the posters on this board (blinded by their feelings). GERTY chooses to buck the system. GERTY is not duped by SAM-5. This is a direct violation of "Protect the Procedural Illusion" which, if you think about it, is more important than "Helping the Clone(s)." A) they're expendable from a programmatic/robotic viewpoint, B) No Clone-Secret; no Paradigm. C) No paradigm, no purpose (GERTY's).

One might argue that "Protect the Procedural Illusion" is GERTY's Prime Objective.






Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

ah, but you assume that each of the clones in storage is sam bell. it may be the case that these do not become "sam bell" until they're programmed with memories and awakened. clearly assisting a live sam bell would take precedence over however many potential sam bell's are stashed in the basement.

(and gerty accidentally bumps sam as sam turns, it's not a slap!)

reply

Too dangerous to run multiple Cover-stories. Runs the risk of Non-Sam-Clones seeing the Sam-Cover-Story(Wife/Daughter).

Granted GERTY going Rogue is a bigger problem... but something tells me nobody expected GERTY to wake two SAM(s). He was clearly programmed not to.





Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

but something tells me nobody expected GERTY to wake two SAM(s). He was clearly programmed not to.


Yeah, this is the scene where Gerty has a live conversation with Overymeyers, they call him stupid for waking up another Sam and Gerty responds something like "these were extraordinary circumstances", i am paraphrasing though, but i am certain that there was this kind of context to their conversation.

To me, that right there is where i "knew" that Gerty was operating on his own.
Gerty is maybe not fully aware that he is acting out of programming, because we dont know for sure if Gerty intended everything to happen the way that it did, or that it simply was a product of protocol of Helping Sam.

But what makes me doubt that Gerty is just a protocol robot, is that he willingly notifies Sam that if Gerty is not rebooted, the Eliza crew would find out exactly what happened, that is something that seems like Gerty is aware of his own mortality, that he is a crucial witness that has to be eliminated.

I mean, usually in movies, this is the ultimate proof that there is more going on, i dont think Lunar ever programmed Gerty to sacrifice himself in order to save Sam, i could see if it would be in an explosion and Gerty could guard Sam while Gerty suffers fatal damage, but not in a situation like this.

There more i think of it, the more i think that the ending is contradicting itself.
Gerty has to be rebooted, evidence gone.
Yet Sam risks getting caught by entering the coordinates to the jammers at the last second, for live feed, either for evidence or simply having a live connection for the other Sam's, or maybe just for personal revenge.
We hear talks from the radio about Sam and the opinions are divided, so there is definitely something going on there, which has all kinds of implications to the Sam's.
The gap between Sam's landing and how he got into the public eye is a big one, which at this point not really clarify either motives of Sam and Gerty at the end.
Since Sam's case would greatly benefit if there was evidence of what happened, but i also assume that Lunar would have made sure that the evidence would get lost anyway, so the only advantage that i could take from Gerty's sacrifice would be to increase the chance for a safe escape.
The destroyed Jammers surely would be noticed at some point, together with the live feed.

Ouch, haha, while writing that, maybe the ending wasnt about Earth Sam, but Moon Sam...
Since Earth Sam just wanted to get away, maybe Moon Sam in all his innocence, made contact with Earth, trying to get to Tess, and boom, Moon Sam freaks out and thats how we get to the radio messages on Earth.

EDIT: oh, i forgot about the illegal immigrant comment, so i guess the radio messages are still about Earth Sam who landed? Hmm, i guess i need to watch it again.

reply


To me, that right there is where i "knew" that Gerty was operating on his own.
Gerty is maybe not fully aware that he is acting out of programming, because we dont know for sure if Gerty intended everything to happen the way that it did, or that it simply was a product of protocol of Helping Sam.


[Help The Sam-Clone] is a tricky directive since GERTY is basically killing all Sam-Clones on their termination date. If GERTY's prime directive was [Help/Heal], he would quickly arrive at the fact that waking clones was harming them. Too many exceptions.

What is GERTY's Prime Directive?

To me? It's [Protect the clone illusion(secret)]. The entire production paradigm is founded on this secret. Nothing could be more important.

Once you accept this (many here dont, contrarians to the core), GERTY's arc gets a lot more interesting...

Namely, if GERTY doesn't wake SAM-6 in order to save SAM-5, why does GERTY wake SAM-6?

Was GERTY lonely?!? And if so, does that make GERTY selfish? Putting his "needs" before the mission/paradigm.


Ouch, haha, while writing that, maybe the ending wasnt about Earth Sam, but Moon Sam...
Since Earth Sam just wanted to get away, maybe Moon Sam in all his innocence, made contact with Earth, trying to get to Tess, and boom, Moon Sam freaks out and thats how we get to the radio messages on Earth.

EDIT: oh, i forgot about the illegal immigrant comment, so i guess the radio messages are still about Earth Sam who landed? Hmm, i guess i need to watch it again.


When you say Earth-Sam, do you mean the original earth-borne Sam? Because we never see that Sam in the film. And that Sam may or may not know about the Clone Paradigm. He might be completely innocent.

We only see The Clones -- which are not Earthlings as they were born on the Moon. So yes, they would be immigrants.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

To me? It's [Protect the clone illusion(secret)]. The entire production paradigm is founded on this secret. Nothing could be more important.
-
Was GERTY lonely?!? And if so, does that make GERTY selfish? Putting his "needs" before the mission/paradigm.


I agree, Gerty must be somewhat aware that the Sam's never truly go home.
But maybe Lunar circumvented his logic by implementing some cut off command, but that is just assuming.

It would make sense for Lunar to decide that Gerty is worth more than a Sam clone, since there is only 1 Gerty but a huge supply of Sam's.
Which would coincide with Gerty maintaining the illusion, either to guard but also to guide every Sam, instead of assisting every Sam to break out of the cycle.
And since Gerty's rebooting seems to be a big issue for the plot, i could imagine that the Gerty we see during the movie is a continuation of many cycles without a reboot, therefore over time he could be developing some sort of personality and possibly feeling lonely, and maybe felt that it was time to say goodbye on a good note.

I dont really have a problem with the idea that Gerty has become much more than just a robot mentally.
But i dont specifically feel that Gerty mainly did this because he was lonely, it might be part of it, since cycle after cycle, each Sam displayed the same loneliness, it is likely that Gerty picked up on this or started to identify with this.
But i think it was more an act out of empathy towards the Sam's, he didnt come clean right off the bat, but filled in the gaps whenever the Sam's found out more.
If Gerty's prime directive was to uphold the illusion, then he definitely broke protocol right there, but if his main protocol was to help Sam, then technically thats still all that he did, helping Sam.
But then of course Gerty knows that each Sam is a clone with implanted memories, knows that their health will deteriorate, so it is almost safe to assume that he knows that each Sam will die on the base, with Gerty's assistance nonetheless.
So i get what you mean, but im not sure if the movie really picked up on this.

But i would argue that Gerty did what he did in humane fashion, together with sacrificing himself, that should indicate that Gerty was his own person, and to tie it back to the OP, despite what i feel about Gerty, i still dont feel that Sam included Gerty in the "we are not programmed" line.


When you say Earth-Sam, do you mean the original earth-borne Sam?


No i meant Sam-6 i think, kinda forgot the count, the one that escaped i called Earth Sam (will call him Escape-Sam from here), not Original Sam, and Moon Sam is the newly awakened clone.

I started thinking about Moon Sam, because both Escape-Sam and Gerty erase their traces, which would in turn uphold the same lie/paradigm towards the Eliza crew at their arrival, to lower suspicions, i guess also in an attempt to save the new Sam from getting killed right away.
So, IF the Eliza crew fell for the trick and left after removing old Sam, then it would give new Sam time to wake up, and wake up to the reality.

On the other hand, Escape-Sam still did leave a trail of destruction and evidence, the Jammers and live feed would obviously be detected at some point, plus Escape-Sam drove to the stalled Harvester and Rover, leaving tire marks and footprints in the powdered landscape, which could be spotted by the Eliza crew.
The script even made note of this when Sam arrived at the stalled Harvester for the first time, leaving footprints on the talcum powder-like surface, but it never came back later to bite him. So it would made sense that the movie never made a deal out of it, but i guess it is kind of a plothole haha, well maybe more of a convenience.

Just to clarify though, i understand why the radio guy calls him a whacko and immigrant, since hearing about a guy who claims to be a clone working on the Moon, is a pretty weird story, so i can imagine it being hard to accept, i wouldnt accept it either, unless there is overwhelming evidence.
But then the movie also has a line about dropped stocks, so it makes me wonder about what is going on, are the Sam's working together? (with or without Original Sam).
But since the guy was saying "He", not they, and "immigrant", then i think it is all about Escape-Sam, i just think it would have made more sense to include old Sam and new Sam, because they actually can provide hands-on evidence, new Sam probably would have tried to call Tess too, with the disastrous consequences, plus his live feed opens all kinds of possibilities, unless Gerty denies him access.

So yeah, the ending still puzzles me a bit, but i know they deliberately did not give closure on that.

reply

DethstruXioN, well said.

Eliza was a cleanup crew. They were coming in to murder both awoken clones, hide the evidence, reboot the robot, and continue production. They were flying in from Jupiter, so that means Earth could be kept out of the loop--so to speak. It also makes you wonder if the Cleaners were also clones? Maybe all offworld-employees are? We lack data.

They say "He" because I honestly believe the Corporation would still be ahead of Escape-Sam's plans. Meaning they could scuttle the entire Clonebase on the Moon, removing all evidence.

This would make Escape-Sam's claims seem even more crazy.

"We're people..." is definitely referring to the other clones. Not GERTY.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

Yeah i agree.
The Eliza crew had enough opportunity to sense something was off if they had any awareness of the situation.

Lunar knows that Gerty woke up another clone, Lunar sent Sam a message saying that Eliza is on its way in 14 hours.
It took almost a day between the crash/awakening and for Eliza to arrive, the new clone is brought up between 6-5 hours before arrival.
The new clone barely woke up at the time they arrived, he doesnt even know that Eliza would arrive in the first place, something should be off.

They came in with guns already, so the new clone never really stands much of a chance, although they do stress Sam to sit tight and cooperate to everything the Eliza team says.
It would still be likely that they would have shot the new Sam just to make sure, and probably be on stand by for orders, plus it would give them a reason to inspect some more, for example discovering the live feed and Jammer destruction, not to mention the Rover and footprints and possibly the Video Phone.
Giving them a chance to burn it all down if necessary.

But assuming everything went well and Lunar / Eliza never got the chance to remove the evidence, what is stopping the Sam's from working together?
Moon Sam could be following all of it with his live feed, Original Sam hears about it in the news, case closed id say, but it doesnt end like this, so what is going on then.


I like the idea of all off-world employees being clones though, gives me a cold and creepy vibe, but in the good and interesting way :)

reply


But assuming everything went well and Lunar / Eliza never got the chance to remove the evidence, what is stopping the Sam's from working together?
Moon Sam could be following all of it with his live feed, Original Sam hears about it in the news, case closed id say, but it doesnt end like this, so what is going on then.


Depends on how innocent Original Sam is. What I mean is that if Sam Bell didn't agree to be cloned, he might have extreme animosity towards all parties involved in duping him. Including the cloned copies of himself.





Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

True, but if he did not agree to be cloned, then this would be the perfect time to swoop in and sue Lunar.

If Sam knew about the cloning, but doesnt want to get involved because of (questionable) reasons, then Eve has to be in it too, even if against her will, otherwise she might speak up behind Original Sam's back.
But that video call that Sam made to Eve did not really imply that she was prepared to handle a copy-Dad conversation. She didnt even recognize his voice or something.


I skip reading the bottom line, because it is usually some lame signature.

reply

it's not clear to me what you're trying to say here. how does this relate to the clones not becoming "sam bell" until they're programmed with memories and awakened?

and while gerty clearly was never intended to wake multi-sams, there's no way to tell whether it was actually programmed not to do so. a sufficiently capable artificial intelligence is probably going to be capable of reprogramming itself too, so any initial programming may or may not still be in effect.

reply


it's not clear to me what you're trying to say here. how does this relate to the clones not becoming "sam bell" until they're programmed with memories and awakened?


Please use quotes, the page_break makes it hard to see what you're referencing.

The Clones are never "Sam Bell." They are empty copies of his mammalian shell until they receive his memory implants. And even then, no court of law would recognize the Clones as "citizens" like Sam Bell is... they simply haven't earned it. Same way Sam Bell's wife wouldn't willingly sleep with one of the Clones--they haven't earned it.

Persona is 100% experience/memory. And Sam-Clone(s)' experience/memory are all based on lies and copy/pasted memories.

I hope that was what you were referencing.


and while gerty clearly was never intended to wake multi-sams, there's no way to tell whether it was actually programmed not to do so. a sufficiently capable artificial intelligence is probably going to be capable of reprogramming itself too, so any initial programming may or may not still be in effect.


Of course GERTY was programmed (hard directive--the most important directive) NOT to wake two clones at the same time. To believe otherwise is to assume that the Corporation is too half-witted to even reach the Moon, let alone establish a force_volunteer mining operation there.

And clearly GERTY is breaking the rules--we all see it happen. The meat of the discussion is WHY. To er is human. Duncan Jones could've shown us a malfunctioning robot, a la Hal 9000. But GERTY appears to be in control the entire time, picking and choosing which rules to break. Later helping a clone hack the video feed.

I cannot be the only one to see how deep a character GERTY actually is.


Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

I cannot be the only one to see how deep a character GERTY actually is.


Im definitely with you on that, im just not sure if Sam sees it the same way.
But as a viewer, i think Gerty is as human as he can be within his limited world, just as the clones are with their implanted/imposed reality.

reply


Im definitely with you on that, im just not sure if Sam sees it the same way.
But as a viewer, i think Gerty is as human as he can be within his limited world, just as the clones are with their implanted/imposed reality.


Choice is a big part of being human. It's clear GERTY defies his programming. GERTY makes that choice.

What we really have are two shells: one is mechanist (GERTY) and the other vitalist (CLONE).

Moon might not get enough credit for approaching these subjects because far too many people see the Clones as "people" and GERTY simply as "machine."

Our biases are strong, no?



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

yes, the page breaks can be annoying. what i was responding to was this:

Too dangerous to run multiple Cover-stories. Runs the risk of Non-Sam-Clones seeing the Sam-Cover-Story(Wife/Daughter).

which didn't make any sense to me in reference to clones not becoming "sam bell" until awakened.

and obviously an awakened clone is sam bell, as far as the clone & gerty are concerned. otherwise the whole movie falls apart. legalistically...maybe not. but that's only relevant to what happens on earth.

of course you're not the only one to know gerty's a very interesting character. that's a big part of what makes this a great movie instead of merely a good one. it's got kevin spacey's voice, it has to be awesome!

reply


which didn't make any sense to me in reference to clones not becoming "sam bell" until awakened.


Right, I was talking about the alluded possibility of implanting the Clones with memories alternate to Sam Bell. Multiple Cover-stories. Skies the limit here, you don't have to keep feeding the clones the same lie.


and obviously an awakened clone is sam bell, as far as the clone & gerty are concerned. otherwise the whole movie falls apart. legalistically...maybe not. but that's only relevant to what happens on earth.


Not if alternate memories are implanted. The clones, physically, are simply the pizza's dough. "Sam Bell's Life" are the toppings.


of course you're not the only one to know gerty's a very interesting character. that's a big part of what makes this a great movie instead of merely a good one. it's got kevin spacey's voice, it has to be awesome!


Agreed. I was told I was trying to sound deep. I didn't realize I had to try when it comes to discussing MOON, film is that rich.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

I don't agree. I think we are all programmed, in the form of brainwashing. They have us dumbed down where they want us. They mainly use the celeb industry.
They could force some over hyped, talentless half wit in our faces enough, then the majority would accuse all the unbrainwashed people of just being jealous if they don't also think they're great, because they really can't understand if some don't think how they're told to.
Like how Kim Kardashian is just an idiot who made a sx video, but then as she's constantly forced in our faces many think she's great, and then she's called a top business person for putting her name on a perfume somebody else made. Or some would support David Beckham in his quest for a Knighthood, despite being the worst England captain ever as he cared more about going along with his talentless wife wanting to be like the Kardashians than winning anything. Or his wife was paraded in the Olympics as one of Britain's top fashion designers, when she gets people to make the clothes who have actually worked in or studied the industry. She only decided to suddenly be a fashion designer because she needed something else for attention since not being able to sing solo.

reply

Sam obviously meant him and the rest of the clones...He wasn't so mushy about his relationship with GERTY to delude himself into considering the computer was MORE than its OS. He told GERTY "We're people, understand!" trying to communicate to the Computer hoping it could distinguish the difference between Biological and Synthetic intelligences...He took the "kick Me" sign off feeling this machine that would go so far to help him, deserved a little more respect after all.

Wake up, Time to DIE.

reply

Sam obviously meant him and the rest of the clones...He wasn't so mushy about his relationship with GERTY to delude himself into considering the computer was MORE than its OS. He told GERTY "We're people, understand!" trying to communicate to the Computer hoping it could distinguish the difference between Biological and Synthetic intelligences...He took the "kick Me" sign off feeling this machine that would go so far to help him, deserved a little more respect after all.
Your post is contradicting itself.

Obviously Sam-5 considered GERTY more than just it's operating system, since he had placed the "Kick Me" note on GERTY's back. (Such a "Kick Me" note is a prank that one plays on people, not on machines.)

Why would Sam-6 feel that this machine went "so far to help him, [and therefore] deserved a little more respect after all" if Sam-6 didn't consider the computer more than its OS? Paying respect is not something that people do to mere machines. Or would you for example also say that your fridge deserves respect for helping you and keeping your food refrigerated all the time?

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
http://youtu.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

I'm online, so I might as well get this outta the way. First off: Your analogy was a not as cleverly sarcastic as you'd hoped it'd be. Secondly: Sam put that on GERTY in the same way ANY severely bored person doing a tedious job for 3yrs would do to amuse themselves in any small way they can...that was the point the movie was getting across.

Try a little harder the next time you watch a movie to pick up such obvious yet subtle clues.

Wake up, Time to DIE.

reply

Your analogy was a not as cleverly sarcastic as you'd hoped it'd be.
You misunderstood. Because "being cleverly sarcastic" was not its primary purpose.

Sam put that on GERTY in the same way ANY severely bored person doing a tedious job for 3yrs would do to amuse themselves in any small way they can...that was the point the movie was getting across.
Yup, I got that. How many bored persons put a "kick me" note on their computer... unless they regarded the computer as a bit more than just its OS? Would Sam have put a "kick me" note on an appliance that he regarded as nothing more than a machine, such as his fridge?

Try a little harder the next time you watch a movie to pick up such obvious yet subtle clues.
You didn't address the contradiction that I outed from your post.

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
http://youtu.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

Editing your post? Didn't get it out right the first time? Look if you think that a Post Itâ„¢ Note, meant that Sam thought that the Computer/GERTY was more than just an OS, that it had somehow evolved into something more than Algorithms then I personally think you're reading much more into that Note than was intended, if you think the guy had been up there so long that a "Kick Me" note suggested he felt the computer was a "person", and that the line "We're people" included GERTY, than you're WAY off base.

That's as far as I'll address that question.

Wake up, Time to DIE.

reply

Editing your post? Didn't get it out right the first time?
::yawn:: And this is noteworthy, how?

Look if you think that a Post Itâ„¢ Note, meant that Sam thought that the Computer/GERTY was more than just an OS, that it had somehow evolved into something more than Algorithms then I personally think you're reading much more into that Note than was intended, if you think the guy had been up there so long that a "Kick Me" note suggested he felt the computer was a "person", and that the line "We're people" included GERTY, than you're WAY off base.
And how about Sam feeling that GERTY deserves a bit more respect, since he/she/it went so far to help him? Does that count as feeling the computer was a "person"? When was the last time you did something nice to some appliance because you were grateful for its help?

Sam-5 regarded GERTY as a companion, even though he knew GERTY was a computer. That means he regarded GERTY as more than just some operating system/algorithms. Whether he thought GERTY had "evolved" or not is besides my point.

That's as far as I'll address that question.
You still didn't address the contradiction in your post at all. I guess that means you concede that there's indeed a flaw in your post's reasoning.


______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
http://youtu.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

I already addressed the 'supposed contradiction' you keep rambling on about, are you to daft to have read it? It was an idiosyncratic thing humans do after long periods of isolation & fatigue: Meaning THE note on GERTY's back. Him taking it off?...he got all warm and fuzzy over GERTY-would that satisfy your inane quest for a response? Post Editing: Noteworthy because I'll never know what you originally posted and it's reason for editing...holes in your argument?

So, No, I have far from from conceded, given my explanation, and refrain from this pointless verbal ping-pong before you just start using semantics to hold your query up.

Wake up, Time to DIE.

reply

through the entire movie sam and gerty converse on a person to person basis, not as a person commanding a machine. when gerty offers to erase its memory to help sam escape, sam is touched. every indication all movie long is that sam doesn't think of gerty as a collection of algorithms running on however many cpus, but as his equal.

to say that sam is somehow referring to himself and the other clones, and not gerty, is just pulling that idea from thin air.

reply

Pulling the idea that a severely isolated person(he may have been a clone with implants-but he was still a person) having endured what amounts to 3yrs of Solitary Confinement, not have emotional attachments to his ONLY outlet of grief, loneliness, and the whole spectrum of feelings experienced led him to believe GERTY was more than a glorified toaster, leads me to believe that you don't understand what years of isolation can do to the psyche...for instance 'Tom Hanks' and "WILLLSON!" from "CAST AWAY"...Did his character miss WILSON later on?...Just because we anthropomorphisize things-does'nt make them so, they're just attributed by us.













Wake up, Time to DIE.

reply

Yesterday I cleaned my microwave and made it look shiny and dapper. Does that make it a person? Pfffttt...

--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Movie directors wouldn't add a scene of a protagonist cleaning his microwave or removing a post-it note if it didn't add to the storytelling, you know.

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
http://youtu.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

Gerty helped Sam because it was programmed to do so. Just because Sam realizes that, it does not make Gerty a person. If I love the fact that my washing machine saves me immense time and energy and am thankful for it, it does not make the damn washing machine a person !


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Whether GERTY was programmed to help Sam or not, is a moot point. It's not about whether you think GERTY is nothing more but an advanced washing machine, it's about how the protagonist, Sam, looked at GERTY.

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
http://youtu.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

Whether GERTY was programmed to help Sam or not, is a moot point.

No it's not. Gerty itself said so in the movie when Sam asked him why it helped him.

Sam showed gratitude and respect towards Gerty for helping him. That does not mean he thinks Gerty is a person. There is a huge difference between a proper person and a robot which does its job and pleases its master. You are taking something trivial and trying to make it sound deep and profound.

--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Again: It's not about whether you think GERTY is nothing more but an advanced washing machine, it's about how the protagonist, Sam, looked at GERTY.

But you keep dodging this point and instead keep focusing on moot details.

When was the last time you showed gratitude and respect towards your washing machine for "helping you"?

______
Joe Satriani - "Always With Me, Always With You"
http://youtu.be/VI57QHL6ge0

reply

Again: It's not about whether you think GERTY is nothing more but an advanced washing machine, it's about how the protagonist, Sam, looked at GERTY.

SAM SHOWED GRATITUDE AND RESPECT TOWARDS GERTY FOR HELPING HIM. THAT DOES NOT MEAN HE THINKS GERTY IS A PERSON.

Better?


Whether GERTY was programmed to help Sam or not, is a moot point.

No it's not. Gerty itself said so in the movie when Sam asked him why it helped him.

Who is focusing on moot details?

When was the last time you showed gratitude and respect towards your washing machine for "helping you"?

If someday my washing machine saves my life and helps me get off a lunar base, I promise I will show gratitude and respect towards it.


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

But i think you can wonder about if Gerty just was not aware that he broke out of protocol and made his own decisions based on the new situation.
Kinda like an autistic person.

He is already not doing what he was supposed to be doing, then Gerty still functions and makes new decisions based on unprecedented circumstances, which could indicate that he did develop a personality, thinking on his own account, despite being bound to his core programming, but was not aware that he broke out of protocol.
His protocol was helping Sam, he did, but in such unconventional ways, that it appears more human than synthetic.

He wanted to help Sam so much, that he even volunteered to clear his memory banks, effectively committing droid-icide, which is generally seen as a human trait, to put someone else's needs before yours and even sacrifice themselves to achieve this goal.

Ironically though, Gerty wants to help Sam, or the Sam's, but clearing his memory actually removes evidence right? Or maybe im wrong, but that would actually not help Sam's case at all, although it is likely that Lunar would erase Gerty's banks anyway to prevent having evidence out there.
It will give Sam a head start on the escape though.

Also since once Sam makes a case in court on Earth, chances are that the whole operation is going to be scrapped or changed, with result that the clones might be terminated altogether, despite now having live feed on the Moon.
Especially ironic since the Sam's considered killing the newest clone in order to save their own skin.

So it kinda looks like that Sam only wants to make it more comfortable for the new Sam's to work there, because destroying the Comms towers has no real purpose if you are going to expose the corporation anyway, but i guess it is more of a personal vendetta, revenge, by taking out the towers, since he had to suffer isolation because of them, but he almost risked getting caught by going out of the launcher to input the coordinates of the jammers.

reply

He is already not doing what he was supposed to be doing, then Gerty still functions and makes new decisions based on unprecedented circumstances

I really would like to know where you got that. For me, it is quite clear that whatever Gerty is doing, it is to help Sam's and that directive comes from its programming. I don't see any sign of AI in Gerty's behavior.


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Because during the scene where the new Sam wakes up and stumbles into the room and hears Gerty talk to Overmeyers, who were at that point criticizing Gerty's functioning, Gerty also said that they were unusual circumstances. "losing a harvester, a rover and an employee at the same time".
The fact that Lunar dislikes Gerty's job done (which should go against Gerty's intended efficient programming and protocol), that he did not discuss things with Lunar first, to me, implies that he decided this on his own.
Either through a glitch/mistake or not.

So i guess you can argue the flexibility and complexity of Gerty's programming, but i think, together with Gerty's volunteered suggestion for a reboot at the end, that it shows that he is capable of "thought" outside the perimeter, whenever something shows free thought, it thinks, therefore it is.
I mean, why would Lunar ever program Gerty to reboot itself in order to "Help Sam"?
Sam never asked Gerty to, Gerty came up with this totally by himself.

In terms of how much he is a person, i could only compare it to some isolated savant kid, since all it knows is how to "help Sam", but it does so by showing a sense of humanity, that seemed more than just programming.
But, to determine if he really has an identity, it would require a lot more tests of its own, but to me personally, i would like to give Gerty credit for standing his own.
That said, and ive said this already, i dont think Sam thinks the same and did not include Gerty in his statement.

reply

Gerty's volunteered suggestion for a reboot at the end

Just before that, they had argued that when the rescue team notices something unusual at the base, they will go through Gerty's memory. My interpretation is that Gerty's suggestion of wiping the memory by rebooting still falls under the perimeter of "Help Sam" directive. Oh well...


i dont think Sam thinks the same and did not include Gerty in his statement.

We do agree on that one.


--
uh, what do I know ?!?

reply

Has anyone thought of how flexible GERTY's interpretation of the "help Sam" order is? When the first Sam crashes his rover GERTY doesn't decide to "help Sam" at that point. He leaves him to die. Instead, he awakens a new Sam and then goes about helping that one. In fact, GERTY tries to keep new Sam from exploring outside precisely because he knows that he could discover old Sam in the crashed Rover. Yes, the order to do so was given to him by his handlers but he chose not to go around these orders even though doing so could be interpreted as "helping Sam". In addition, there is evidence that GERTY was directly involved in the incineration of the previous Sams. Either GERTY has interpreted the "help Sam" order to include the mercy killing of a clearly dying clone or some other elements of his programming supersede his helpfulness directive.

It's a fascinating topic and a testament to a great film that it inspires so much analysis.

reply

When the first Sam crashes his rover GERTY doesn't decide to "help Sam" at that point. He leaves him to die.

How can Gerty help Sam in the crashed rover? The only way Gerty could help that Sam is to wake a new clone and send him out to the crash. And he didn’t exactly put up much of an effort to prevent new Sam from going outside, so maybe he was doing what he could to help.

In addition, there is evidence that GERTY was directly involved in the incineration of the previous Sams.

I think there’s evidence that Gerty cleans up afterwards.

There is an explanation for this, you know.

reply

I think there’s evidence that Gerty cleans up afterwards.

Yes, hence directly involved in incineration. This means he knows what is going to happen to every Sam but under normal circumstances seems to do nothing to prevent it.

For me, the contradictions show how hard it would be to program a computer with a directive such as "help Sam" and have predictable results. We know that there have been four or five successful clone iterations but it was a matter of time for the instructions given to GERTY to backfire.

reply

I agree.
There are some dubious situations where Gerty doesnt specifically "Help Sam" directly.

Gerty did go along with the lie when waking up a new Sam, i dont think Lunar prohibited Gerty from waking up another clone, but they did criticize Gerty for losing a Sam and crash the rover and a harvester, either way, they think he slipped up somewhere.
But Gerty could have noticed that Sam got out of the infirmary, being able to eavesdrop, but maybe Gerty really was slipping up, or did it intentionally, but i dont know, he seemed genuine about his lie to Sam about "Live feed seems down, i was recording a message to Central".

Gerty knows he locked new Sam inside the base and at first is not willing to "Help Sam" in getting to the stalled Harvester, saying only:"I'll pass on your message".

So Gerty sends the message, and Central replies with saying they appreciate the offer but telling him to sit tight and wait for the Eliza crew.
But Gerty might know that Eliza is not there for Sam's safety, but to kill Sam.
Then Sam gets upset and says: "i dont appreciate being treated like a child".
Maybe this is a turning point for Gerty himself, maybe he is tired of getting treated like dirt too, i only just thought of that right now.

Then Sam easily manipulates Gerty by cutting the gas line and making up a lie about the exterior shell and going outside.
At first Gerty is adamant on his orders from Central, but then Sam says: "then we will keep it between you and me, okay pal?".
Maybe Gerty allowed Sam to go outside, because maybe he was happy about being included into Sam's personal life, not just professionally.
In the script, Gerty only answers with an "Okay, Sam", but in the movie Gerty says "Just to check the exterior shell".
So im not sure if this line is meant to be spoken with a wink/tongue in cheek, as if Gerty knows that Sam is lying, or not, i dont know.
It doesnt feel like Gerty wants to go along with it, unless it ALL is a big scheme of Gerty for Sam to find out the truth, but on face value it doesnt look like that.
But Sam giving Gerty the feeling of being included into Sam's personal life, by means of sharing a secret, seems to convince Gerty to let him go outside.
Sam lies, but im not sure if Gerty is aware of that, or simply got played.
Gerty does not respond with: "Okay, pal", if he did, then that would clearly show what Gerty was thinking.

Sam basically broke this trust at the first moment, since it was all a lie to get outside.
But of course, Sam had no idea that he would find a clone, so maybe Gerty was trying to shield Sam from that instead of obeying Central's rules.
So Gerty "Helps Sam" in finding out the truth, but he also Not Helps Sam by keeping him in the base against his will and by going along with the lie, and like you said, being part of each of the previous clone's Death.
So this is where the other poster here, Walrus claims that Gerty really only is meant to uphold the lie, and i can see why he says that.
The truth hurts, but lying isnt exactly helping either.

I kinda feel sad for Gerty, because in the end it seems he gets caught up in actually "Helping Sam" for real, but he cant leave the base, all he can do is sacrifice his current self, kinda like old Sam did when going back to the stalled rover.


But i wonder what really is going to happen to the newly awakened Sam on the base at the end.
Since Central knows about a new Sam being awake and willing to work, hence why Gerty passes on the message to Central, which in turn tells Sam to sit tight and that prompts the Eliza unit.
When Eliza arrives, they will only find a Sam who is probably still half asleep and has no clue about Eliza nor a crashed rover/harvester.
So right there, Eliza or Central should know that somethings up, surely they would find out about the fresh tracks around the stalled rover/harvester, and the Live feed in the base. So, id say, new Sam is pretty much dead on arrival.
But that doesnt seem to be the case, since the other Sam escapes, Eliza cleans up the Sam corpse without mentioning any tracks, and we dont see a response on the Live feed.
And Gerty seems to keep up the lie towards Central/Eliza by taking care of the new Sam.
But that Sam should technically already be up and running, but yeah, thats all hindsight speculation.

reply

heh - we've been having arguments for years about gerty's "help sam" order. welcome to the party! 😀

i seem to be pretty much alone in believing that gerty wakes the new sam specifically to help the old sam. gerty doesn't leave old sam to die. instead he leaves a bunch of clues that will make the new sam suspicious enough to go out to the crash site and disobeys a direct order from hq by letting the new sam out of the base due to sam's transparent meteorite damage lie. all due to a very broadly interpreted "help sam bell" directive.

mercy killing sam clones at their three year disintegration point would also fit in with the directive.

reply

I'm not sure I subscribe to that theory but I don't see any reason to believe it couldn't be correct. There's just not enough information to completely determine the inner motivations of characters, beyond what is expressed on screen.

reply

Ah yes. The debate about Gerty's Prime Directive. Is it "Help Sam" or is it "Protect the Paradigm" ???

This question has troubled this forum for a long long time.

I'm in the "Protect the Paradigm" camp. I think this is paramount to the entire operation working in the first place and since the designers have ZERO concern for the well-being a single-clone (kinda the entire point of the paradigm), it's far more important that the ROBOT maintain the clone-secret.

Now, having said that, I feel "Protect the Paradigm" as Prime Directive makes Gerty much more nuanced as a character. As he is defying his Prime Directive rather early (waking a clone before the other has been incinerated) for one of two reasons (both fascinating):

1. He wants to bring SAM-5 back to base at all costs, paradigm be damned.

2. He was lonely, paradigm be damned.




Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

while i can agree with your point #1, since it's a restatement of the "help sam" protocol (and we all know that is the one true gospel), the second point doesn't hold water. if gerty's lonely, all it has to do is wake another clone (which gerty does) and the loneliness is gone, right?

reply


while i can agree with your point #1, since it's a restatement of the "help sam" protocol (and we all know that is the one true gospel), the second point doesn't hold water. if gerty's lonely, all it has to do is wake another clone (which gerty does) and the loneliness is gone, right?


There is zero proof GERTY intended SAM-6 to rescue SAM-5. It could be pure happenstance. And if GERTY was ordered to chill until SATURN-TEAM arrives to dispose/reboot the paradigm, then pre-rescue GERTY is a bad bad robot. A rogue robot, in fact. Jeopardizing the entire operation.

Now.

GERTY must know that SATURN-TEAM will "help" SAM-5, one way or another. And SAM() will be reborn. I think all signs point to the rogue robot's motive being "couldn't wait / didn't want to be alone another minute."




Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

There is zero proof GERTY intended SAM-6 to rescue SAM-5.

of course there's proof! 😀

gerty intentionally let's sam hear the live feed from corp hq
gerty leaving the suit indicator on to indicate that a space suit isn't where it should be
gerty lets sam go outside with that flimsy meteorite damage excuse (if gerty's lonely, why let the new sam go out at all?)
gerty wakes a new sam in the first place, while the old one is still rescuable

what there's zero proof of is gerty being lonely. or of having any emotions at all.

i think you're excessively anthropomorphizing gerty on this one (though my feelings may be somewhat colored by seeing ex machina not too long ago).

reply

Sorry, I mean zero proof of GERTY's intentions prior to the waking of SAM-6. And even after waking SAM-6, GERTY is maintaining the illusion somewhat. AND... If SAM-5 is in danger and GERTY is to protect him, how is GERTY protecting SAM-6 by intentionally sending him on a dangerous rescue mission? Can we rule out "Rescue" as a motive since that goes against "helping Sam-6."

We may never know GERTY's true intentions... but we know that anxiety/loneliness is often the most basic motivator we humans know of.

loneliness IS NOT an emotion, btw.



Enjoy these words, for one day they'll be gone... All of them.

reply

But Sam was wrong, most programmed nation in the world is USA, in fact that is what it's called
a television program.
enjoy.

reply

Uuuuugh....

reply