MovieChat Forums > A Walk in the Woods (2015) Discussion > These actors are in their 70's!

These actors are in their 70's!


The age of these actors totally changes the dynamic of the autobiographical book Bryson wrote in his 40's. I think this casting is way, way off base. Either actor might have been great in the roles while younger, but who in their right mind will believe they're hiking hundreds of miles up and down mountains without motorized wheel chairs and a backpack full of metamucil?

I don't mean to sound ageist, but A Walk in the Woods is a hilarious book and deserves better, more appropriate casting for the story.

reply

In 1948, Earl Shaffer of York, Pennsylvania, brought a great deal of attention to the project by completing the first documented thru-hike.[10] Later Shaffer also completed the first north-to-south thru-hike, making him the first to do so in each direction.[11] In 1998 Mr. Shaffer, nearly 80 years old, again hiked the entirety of the trail, making him the oldest person ever to complete a thru-hike.[12][13] Lee Barry became the oldest to thru-hike the AT when he completed a thru-hike (his second) in 2004 at age 81.[4]

I think Redford will be perfect for the dry humor and wit the author is praised for. You should get out and see more of the older population; they are in better shape than those that hit up Golden Corral and then ride around in scooters in Wal-Mart.

reply

You'd be surprised. I spent several summers working in the White Mountains of NH - right along the Appalachian Trail - and I'd regularly encounter thru hikers well into their 70s. Sure, it's not exactly normal, but far from unbelievable.

reply

Yeah but Mr Shaffer was already an experienced hiker before he did his thru-hike.

reply

[deleted]

Bill Bryson was 44 years old in 1996, the year he hiked the trail. His friend Katz, a school friend, would have been about the same age, and his wife is also roughly in his age category. Robert Redford is now 78, Nick Nolte 73 and Emma Thompson 55. She's the only one within hailing distance (a decade or so) of the real person she's portraying.

It's not just a question of Redford being 30 years older than the man he's playing. When he took off to hike the trail, Bryson left behind not only his English wife, who was still adjusting to life in a new country (and struggling with mastering driving on on the right), but also four children, ranging in age from early elementary school up through late high school. There was an underlying sense of connection to a young family in the book; he thought about them, missed them, and broke off the hike at various points to go home and see them.

A man in his late 70s rarely has the sense of responsibility for raising a family that he had when he was the father of a growing family who needed him. I suggest you read Notes From a Big Country, a book of newspaper columns that he wrote during the mid-to-late 90s for a British newspaper. His family are a regular feature -- taking his eldest son off to university, attending Dartmouth basketball games with a daughter, playing catch with his youngest son, seven-year-old Sam, on the lawn. By his 70s most men are grandfathers, the day-to-day routine of child-rearing a distant memory. In retirement, they have the time and freedom to tackle a long-term challenge that is much harder in the prime working years. Portraying Bryson as a man in his 70s will inevitably change the tone of the story.

Men in their mid-40s tackling a physical challenge like through-hiking the AT are often motivated by a desire to show that they haven't lost their youth, that they're still fit enough to succeed. A man in his late '70s has no such illusions. He's not twenty again or anything close to it. He's more likely to be motivated by a desire to complete the hike while his body is still able to, but there's no question of clinging to eternal youth.

reply

I am with you turtlemom1! I question whether the other posters have read the book. The question isn't whether 70 year olds can hike the AT. The question is why are 70 y.o.'s playing 40 year old characters. And unless both Redford and Nolte pack on quite a bit of weight, they are too in shape for the role. These guys are supposed to be fat out of shape 40 somethings. I fear this is going to be "Grumpy Old Men III: Gone Hikin'"

I kind of hope this current production falls apart, even if we have to wait.

reply

[deleted]

Despite Redford's multi-year enthusiasm for the story, I always, ALWAYS thought Paul Giamatti was the only choice for the lead role. He's much closer to how I always pictured Bryson (or his alter ego).

The war is not meant to be won... it is meant to be continuous.

reply

I don't mean to slam Redford, either. He proved he's still got it last year in ALL IS LOST; that's not the issue. But A WALK IN THE WOODS with senior citizens is, well, a different story entirely than the one in the book. I know, it doesn't have to be the book to be good (as an actor, writer, and audiobook Narrator, I know THAT). I was just hoping for something slightly closer to the source.

The war is not meant to be won... it is meant to be continuous.

reply

Agreeing with those posters who are saying that age changes the story. However there is definitely ageism in asserting that hikers in their seventies would need assistance. Most would, but there are people sixty-plus who can run circles around people twenty, thirty, forty years younger. At least in America. Have you looked around? Many young people are seriously out of shape. Not saying your average seventy-year-old could hike the trail. Obviously it's going to be harder for older people. But I don't think your average thirty-year-old is necessarily in shape to do it either.

reply