Something that bothered me - feedback please
Alright, first off, I am not a Woody Allen fan really. I haven't seen much of his work and of what I have seen I can't really remember much of it. I am a big Larry David fan which is why I saw the movie. So maybe I just don't get how Woody Allen shoots his movies, but I was bothered by the way the movie was shot:
Didn't it seem like a play to anyone else? - Not that this is usually bad, but just the way that his apartment served to hold most of the action and the way that it looked and was set up.
When her (I forgot the main girls name) parents come to find her it seemed like a new act or scence beginning. Very awkwardly done and with no real build up.
Other things that I couldn't stand was the fact that Boris constantly broke the fourth wall and how essentially one note all of the characters were. There was no real rising action either, things just seemed to happen with no reason or cause and it had no real effect on the movie.
That being said (Curb joke), I thought some parts of the movie were very funny, mostly carried by the talent of Larry David. No one else in the movie was very funny or had a real purpose. Who the hell was that guy that stole Boris's girl? His character had no purpose or background, we knew nothing about him except that being really creepy and pushy will get you girls.
My rant is done, someone talk to me about this.
In Tyler We Trusted