What cruelty and superficiality? Give me some examples ... the only thing that I found a tiny bit superficial was Valentino saying he didn't want any "midgets" in the runway show. But it's just who is he: over the top, primadonna, in the best way.
I think you'll find that most artists are very vain and very selfcentered, sometimes even cruel. I really don't think Picasso was a picnic to be around, for example. That doesn't take away from their art and even though people refuse to accept it Valentino's creations are works of art and he is a genius of his craft, the last one unfortunately.
And I'm sorry, but if you had spent 50 years of your life utterly dedicated to your vision and your career, you'd take it seriously too. We're not all of us working to save African orpahns but that does not make our work and our passions less important or serious, at least to us.
I'm no fashion nut and I certainly don't want to defend the fashion "hanger ons" and the financial leeches that are the driving force behind this industry but I do know enough about artistic merit to acknoledge that Valentino's creations are some serious works of utter beauty.
What would disguise itself as a rat? A mouse with delusions of grandeur
reply
share