Sprinklers (spoiler)


What was your impression? Did Richard deliberately set the sprinklers to create the "Bad Thing" that Welles wanted? Or was it an accident and he was just grasping at straws to deflect Welles' anger when accused?

reply

I think it is an accident. The way he looks as he hears water flowing through the pipes. Not sure why though he was playing with matches anyway.

reply

He's reading graffiti on the walls in the poorly lit room. Holding matches up to see better.

reply

He was most likely also playing with matches because he just saw Welles impress the girl at the CBS radio studio with the match/flower trick.

-He was not of an age, but for all time." -Ben Jonson on William Shakespeare

reply

Accident. But as pointed out in the "goofs" on IMDb, fire sprinklers are triggered individually by heat. Triggering one might set off an alarm, but would not cause the others to release. Also, a match would be unlikely to set off even one. It's not a smoke detector, but is set off by melting a solder plug or breaking a glass vial, either kind unlikely for a match to trigger.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_sprinkler

Edward

reply

It was implied that it was an accident, but also it is a gag relating to the "bad thing" that is supposed to happen before the play opens.

reply

Sent the following in as a Trivia item a little while back, but I suspect they found it too longwinded, and I haven't seen it appear. Anyway:

While the way in which the film shows a sprinkler system being triggered may not be accurate, the incident shown really did occur, and was indeed set off by the 'Zac Efron' (qv) character of the Mercury actor who was playing Lucius at the time, 'Arthur Anderson (II)' (qv). 'Orson Welles' (qv) himself described the sprinkler incident during the closing credits of the Mercury Theatre radio broadcast of "Treasure Island" the following year, on July 18, 1938:

"First of all, I'd like you to meet [the actor who played] Jim Hawkins, Junior, our leading man at 14 years old. Last season he made a really startling contribution to the stage history of Shakespeare's plays. This was during the course of some experiments with the Mercury Theatre sprinkler system. As a consequence of what must certainly have been extensive research in that field, he caused it to rain, actually to rain, and copiously to rain where in more than 300 years it has never rained in 'Julius Caesar' before. It rained on Brutus, it rained all over Brutus in the forum. I was Brutus, and I ought to know."

"Now, as dramatic criticism, I found this telling, and even final. But as a surprise item in the funeral scene, I can assure you that the unexpected appearance on the stage of so many gallons of real water created in us all, an impression that was almost overwhelming. Our popular leading man says that he did it all with a match. I don't dare think what he'll do when he's old enough to run for president, but meanwhile, no matter what happens to the plumbing, he can always work for the Mercury. As you've probably discovered, he's something more than a very gifted performer, and as I told you, he's something less than 15."

"His name shall not be withheld: I refer to that fine old actor Arthur Anderson." (Actor 'George Coulouris' (qv) was credited as "having escaped 'Rainmaker' Anderson" during that incident.)

At the very end of the broadcast credits, a faint crash is heard in the background, and Welles ad libs, "There is at this moment a disturbance in the control room, and if it isn't a tumbrel, it's Arthur Anderson. It's a good thing the program's over."

reply