MovieChat Forums > Me and Orson Welles (2009) Discussion > Only criticism...........p oor scratchy ...

Only criticism...........p oor scratchy records for score


Linklater should have recorded new tracks, hired a composer, or dispensed with music altogether. Featuring those old scratchy recordings gave the film a cheap feel to it.

There is no "off" position on the genius switch.

reply

[deleted]

Apparently they forgot to install the genius switch when you were manufactured.

reply

Certainly not for every track; I heard many songs without record-scratch sounds but they are old recordings which were probably done on acetates. Recording quality at that time was not what it is today. If you think those recordings give the film a "cheap feel" (are you sure it's cheap to pay for all those songs? are you in the music publishing business?), then what in the hell were you doing watching a movie about the '30s in the first place? You should let Woody Allen know some of his best films also have a "cheap feel" because of the classic recordings he sometimes used.

You know what the worst thing is though... they used cars and clothing from the time period also. They should have been wearing new clothes and driving new cars so we wouldn't have to deal with all that '30s stuff, right?

reply

Man, I thought that the authentic soundtrack was one of the best things about the movie (second only to McKay's portrayal of Orson Welles). I think that using appropriate music is one of the very best ways of helping to properly recreate a time from the past that is long gone. I thought the score was much better and fitted to the subject matter than what 99% of composers could have done for the movie. I loved it. I was even checking for more info about the songs during the credits.

reply

Got to disagree with edwardholub about this movie's score. Using authentic music from the time period and setting was a wonderful choice. I really enjoyed this movie a lot, especially relishing Mr. McKay and lots of the other cast members, including Zac Efron, who impressed me in 17 AGAIN and this. The only other of Zac's movies that I've seen is HAIRSPRAY, in which I *think* he was fine, but I was unhappy with so much of the translation from stage to screen, that I don't have a good sense of his performance. Anyway, ME AND ORSON WELLES was so much fun, and beautiful to look at (and hear).



Multiplex: 100+ shows a day, NONE worth watching. John Sayles' latest: NO distribution. SAD.

reply