This is biggest load of *beep* ever...
It never starts. Then it starts, but hold on, no it doesn't. It never starts. Then it ends, and it's a tedious mess. Lydia, Adam, Yoshi, Simon, Claire and I didn't enjoy it at all. No stars.
shareIt never starts. Then it starts, but hold on, no it doesn't. It never starts. Then it ends, and it's a tedious mess. Lydia, Adam, Yoshi, Simon, Claire and I didn't enjoy it at all. No stars.
shareReally? I loved it, watched about 5 years ago on an HD channel. Thought it was a great movie. I could see people who hate slow movies would lose interest.
shareAnd I would say you're wrong, I like slow movies if they're done right. I wouldn't call this movie suspenseful.
share[deleted]
What's so suspenseful about the scenes where she's walking around the house? She's not in danger at all during that time. Isn't the point of suspenseful scenes to be suspenseful?
sharei guess everybody perceives it differently. i was looking extra hard into all the corners of the house, the shadows and out-of-focus areas when she snooped around -- especially after megan dies.
to me, it was a very suspenseful movie. and i was at the edge of my seat when she went up the stairs to the attic and reached for the chain to turn on the lightbulb. the direction, the pace of the scene, the music, everything in that sequence was done deliciously and came together perfectly. i haven't felt like that in a looong while and still, after that, i had to wait years for another movie to bring that feeling of dread back (the last will and testament of rosalind leigh).
but yeah, different strokes for different blokes. i, for one, thought it was a suspenseful movie through and through.
really in the mood to rewatch this now!
If you start sitting around the campfire, telling scary stories -- change our names!share
especially after megan dies
I agree with you that that scene was the best in the movie, but I think they could have drawn out the dread a lot longer instead of having her faint. That ruined the movie for me. ;/
share[deleted]
I thought this movie was done well for like the first hour. However, the build-up leads to nothing, which is what irked me.
sharenothing? did you miss the ending?
shareThe ending wasn't scary though. Basically a variation of Rosemary's Baby. By that point the excitement had already been blown anyway.
---
http://dratsab.deviantart.com/art/Greg-Huffman-Complete-Listing-of-Works-453546151
Of course you think he's wrong. You think everyone's wrong, but you. It's a trend you have here on IMDB.
shareThen why did I thought The Conjuring is more effective?
That movie will be seen as a classic in the future.
I am rarely on IMDb these days, so forgive me to butt into your conversation; but, see, I didn't think that The Conjuring was more effective than The House of the Devil. On the contrary.
What I am trying to say, is, that it all comes down to individual taste. It's subjective, so these back-and-forths seem rather exhausting under that aspect.
E.g.: I thought that the script for The Conjuring was vastly lacking in good dialogue or scene arrangement. Some parts of the movie were a chore for me to sit through because, as someone who loves the horror genre and reads many screenplays, the idea should have been handed to a gifted and talented script writer or to a "script doctor" to iron out all the hiccups the screenplay suffered from.
Now, I am sure that some people will say that The House of the Devil's screenplay was not good (and I am sure there will be some who love the horror genre as much as I do and read as many screenplays as I do with that notion). But I have to disagree. It was nicely paced. The sadness and melancholy that comes from the main character is greatly interweaved into the story and there's nothing I would have changed regarding the dialogue. Overall, it was a more satisfying, tighter script and was converted suspensefully for the screen.
And again, to come back to differing tastes: Some might think The House of the Devil was a boring snooze-fest, to put it very ineloquenty. I am not one of those and regard it as one of the best horror movies to come out in recent years. And I truly think that it will be considered a classic in years to come.
On the other side, people will think the same thing about The Conjuring.
All I am saying, is, that there is so much negative discussion that just comes down to different tastes and people being unable to regard it as just that: different taste. Maybe not on here, but I have seen other threads or boards where people were attacking each other, which I found rather sad.
What? Why?
The only thing remotely scary about this film is Megan driving her car for long periods without looking at the road ahead.
share[deleted]
I disagree on The Conjuring being good as some say. I wanted so badly and tempted as I left the theater to ask for my money back, but just left quietly out. It was a snore-fest. I just bought this movie on Blu-Ray at a 7 eleven for $4, and reading these posts makes me regret even the cheap purchase. I mean and I am sorry for those who love build up movies, but I can't stand wasting a couple of hours watching nothing happening.
So if I watch this movie, and it is anything like The Conjuring at all, then I am going to be one pissed off person. Maybe even toss this disc away. I might keep it, but never watch it again or give it to someone for free. Sorry, but the build up movies turn me way off. Not enjoyable films at all.
To each their own. I enjoy a good horror that has action in it. No wandering around doing nothing, is not entertaining, and this sounds like this movie is exactly a wandering around kind of wasting time movie. I guess if I am tempting enough now to watch it.
I am a gore watching freak!!!
If it don't have it, it isn't worth the watch.
i liked it the first time i watched it but the second time i thought it was really boring
sharehaha-no, The Conuring was actually far less effective than this film.
share[deleted]
i think that's what spyingeye was referring to: everyone has a different taste. i don't think svali needs to reconsider her watching habits. she doesn't think it's as good as conjuring. and this is a message board, all opinions are welcome as long as it doesn't lead to fights and attacks. i mean, i wouldn't spend much time on a board for a movie i don't particularly enjoy, but them's the breaks. it doesn't devalue her opinion of the movie, or your enjoyment of it.
The sadness and melancholy that comes from the main character
If you start sitting around the campfire, telling scary stories -- change our names!share
Well, I'm a he actually and thanks for writing that I don't need to reconsider my watching habits
I love stuff like The Uninvited (1944), original Halloween, original The Haunting etc., I don't think the movie was as successful as those when it comes to suspense, that doesn't mean I don't "get it".
exactly. i love those movies, too, (although i prefer the original balck christmas over halloween), and i thought that thotd succeeded very much in suspense, thrill and storytelling. like i said in my previous reply, one of the aspects that drew me into the story was the melancholy of the character, as spyingeye put it.
oh, i thought you were a she... probably the nikola in your name that threw me off
If you start sitting around the campfire, telling scary stories -- change our names!share
[deleted]
I agree. I love slow burning movies but this literally put me to sleep, and I never fall asleep during movies. This was just kind of blah. I didn't hate it though, Greta Gerwig is what saved the movie for me but she was killed and then I fell asleep. I also hated watching her walk for like 25 mins around the house. I felt as if I was the one baysitting, thinking to myself "I should be getting paid for babysitting myself to watch this blah movie.". 5/10 stars for me.
shareWell, this is not about what you think, but the reality. My guess is that you should reconsider the way you watch horror movies.
And the last 20 minutes it's dispair that only a new horror classic have.
Yeah, it was really boring. I tried to watch it but ended up skipping through to the end, and even the violent part wasn't that interesting. I do think it did a really good job making it look like it was in the 80s, but I'm not particularly nostalgic or anything, so even that didn't make it interesting.
shareYour logic to why it's *beep* is that of a 6 year old's.
It's a fantastic horror. I guess horror isn't for you, go back to your Transformers or whatever.
"NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition!!"
The old transformers comment eh!
IMO this film fails because although it takes the time to build suspense; the guy is odd on the phone, the house is remote, the situation is pretty weird, all good so far, the tension is building but never reaches a crescendo, all that looking around the house and she didn't find anything creepy, they could have done more with the family snaps etc.. and added more suspense but instead as soon as she is creeped out she's caught! Then her escape is ridiculously easy for someone bound by all four limbs to the floor and then suddenly it ends and we get the cliche in the hospital.
Her actions in the graveyard go entirely against her behaviour right up until that point, nothing the guy says to her really connects or has any sense of inevitability so it doesn't fit other than to quickly end the film.
For a considerably superior capture film I'd suggest the excellent Martyrs.